SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Renovis RNVS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mopgcw who wrote (25)6/12/2005 1:31:15 AM
From: tuck  Respond to of 45
 
[A-425619, a Novel TRPV1 Receptor Antagonist -- Abbott]

>>J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Apr 18; [Epub ahead of print]

A-425619, a Novel TRPV1 Receptor Antagonist, Relieves Pathophysiological Pain Associated with Inflammation and Tissue Injury in Rats.

Honore P, Wismer CT, Mikusa JP, Zhu CZ, Zhong C, Gauvin DM, Gomtsyan A, El Kouhen R, Lee CH, Marsh K, Sullivan JP, Faltynek CR, Jarvis MF.

Abbott Laboratories.

The vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1, TRPV1) which is a member of the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily, is highly localized on peripheral and central processes of nociceptive afferent fibers. Activation of TRPV1 contributes to the pronociceptive effects of capsaicin, protons, heat, and various endogenous lipid agonists such as anandamide and N-arachidonoyl-dopamine (NADA). A-425619 is a novel potent and selective antagonist at both human and rat TRPV1 receptors. In vivo, A-425619 dose-dependently reduced capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia (ED50 = 45 micromol/kg, p.o.). A-425619 was also effective in models of inflammatory pain and post-operative pain. A-425619 potently reduced complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced chronic inflammatory pain after oral administration (ED50 = 40 micromol/kg, p.o.) and was also effective after either intrathecal administration or local injection into the inflamed paw. Furthermore, A-425619 maintained efficacy in the post-operative pain model after twice daily dosing p.o. for five days. A-425619 also showed partial efficacy in models of neuropathic pain. A-425619 did not alter motor performance at the highest dose tested (300 micromol/kg, p.o.). Taken together, the present data indicate that A-425619, a potent and selective antagonist of TRPV1 receptors, effectively relieves acute and chronic inflammatory pain and post-operative pain.<<

So we've got Renovis/Pfizer, Amgen, and now Abbott with competing VR1 programs. Looks like a horse race, with entrants just out of the gate.

Edit: J&J is here, too. And, of course, Neurogen/Merck, where I meant to post this.

>>J Med Chem. 2005 Mar 24;48(6):1857-72.

Identification and biological evaluation of 4-(3-trifluoromethylpyridin-2-yl)piperazine-1-carboxylic acid (5-trifluoromethylpyridin-2-yl)amide, a high affinity TRPV1 (VR1) vanilloid receptor antagonist.

Swanson DM, Dubin AE, Shah C, Nasser N, Chang L, Dax SL, Jetter M, Breitenbucher JG, Liu C, Mazur C, Lord B, Gonzales L, Hoey K, Rizzolio M, Bogenstaetter M, Codd EE, Lee DH, Zhang SP, Chaplan SR, Carruthers NI.

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development L.L.C., 3210 Merryfield Row, San Diego, California 92121, USA.

High throughput screening using the recombinant human TRPV1 receptor was used to identify a series of pyridinylpiperazine ureas (3) as TRPV1 vanilloid receptor ligands. Exploration of the structure-activity relationships by parallel synthesis identified the essential pharmacophoric elements for antagonism that permitted further optimization via targeted synthesis to provide a potent orally bioavailable and selective TRPV1 modulator 41 active in several in vivo models.<<

Cheers, Tuck



To: mopgcw who wrote (25)1/15/2012 8:09:58 PM
From: pgo-neil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45
 
The rest of the story... On 31 May 2005, Renovis signed an agreement with Pfizer that looked like good news in terms of cash, support and validation. But as documented by Tuck in the Firesales thread,
Message 21374081

the stock went down over 20% that day. Today's Boston Globe has a story on Expert Networks that provides the background for this discrepant event.

Best,
graham
--

bostonglobe.com

[Lots of interesting detail snipped...]

Dr. Corey Goodman was on vacation in Hawaii in spring 2005 when he was deluged with calls from panicky investors in his small firm, Renovis, which had just reported promising results of the clinical trial of a stroke drug under development. On May 31, 2005, Leerink had hosted a conference call in which one of its MedaCorp consultants, Dr. Marc Fisher of UMass Memorial Medical Center, questioned whether the results were as promising as Renovis asserted.

After the call, Renovis’s stock got hammered, losing nearly 23 percent on May 31 alone.

Goodman said he contacted Fisher and urged him to learn more about the study methods. Fisher, in a recent interview, acknowledged he was not well informed about the Renovis study when he first questioned its results. “I really stepped in it,’’ Fisher said.

Fisher, who no longer does expert consulting because he edits a medical journal, said he blames Leerink in part for the incident, contending the firm did not prepare him sufficiently for the conference call. (MedaCorp’s website says consultants such as Fisher are given materials to prepare them to talk directly to investors.) He later retracted his initial opinion of the Renovis drug after talking to the trial’s principal investigator. But his subsequent remarks on the study - to an industry journal - did not receive nearly the attention on Wall Street as those made during the Leerink call.

Ultimately, Goodman’s beef with Leerink didn’t matter. In a subsequent trial, the stroke drug proved ineffective and AstraZeneca, which had licensed the drug from Renovis, elected to drop it. Renovis, which was sold to a German firm, closed in 2008.