Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (105488)	5/31/2005 11:07:09 AM
From: Bill	Respond to of 108807

Typical of liberals. Throw out the baby with the bath water.

To: epicure who wrote (105488)	5/31/2005 11:41:16 AM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 108807

I'm SO annoyed by this. Partisanship is to be expected, but to let it hurt kids is just so stupid and wrong. Blech. Who cares WHY Schwarzenegger was doing a good thing? The fact is he was doing one. So, Grannie, in the face of this article posted by ionesco do you still cling to the view that liberals are always out to help the unfortunate and conservatives are always out to hurt them?

To: epicure who wrote (105488)	6/1/2005 1:20:51 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

What about this point, though, Ionesco? From what I've read, it seems like a valid point. I guess the question is whether children are better off with fresh fruit now but horrendous cuts generally in children's services, or would they be better off with Schwarzenegger out of office? "Some Democrats even suggested that the governor's inclusion of the food program in his budget plan was a political stunt, an effort to obscure an overall strategy that leaves schools without funding for basic services."