SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (921)5/31/2005 12:12:52 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Peter, when I was much, much younger than 65, doctors did not want to perform needed surgery on me because I smoked cigarettes and was thus considered an extraordinarily risky prospect.

Every day, I come into contact with surgical reports on people who are well into their 80s--smokers and nonsmokers and those who have never smoked.

BTW, spinal or epidural anesthesia is considered safer than general (or inhalation) anesthesia. Whenever surgery is being performed below the diaphragm, spinal or epidural anesthesia can be used. Funny thing is, most people do not want to be awake and aware during their surgeries, which the patient is when spinal or epidural anesthesia is used; hence, the patients' overwhelming preference for general anesthesia. - Holly



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (921)6/1/2005 12:16:19 AM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
re: "Are you sure that the doctors are rationing precious resources for breast cancer surgery and not practicing lifespan management. Doctors could be doing either."

Well, I don't know about now. But it seems like rationing did occur - and on more than just cancer surgery.

news.bbc.co.uk