SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (235140)6/1/2005 11:45:34 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572191
 
Not even the Democrats have been bold enough in their plans for conservation and investment in alternative fuels. I think both parties are thinking along the lines of $5 to $10 billion. But we need to start thinking more along the lines of a project to Mars. We need $100 to $200 billion to really jumpstart the industry and the technologies, as well as build the infrastructure and create tax incentives. We need a no holds barred attempt.

It's sort of like a drug-addict. No half measures will work. You need to go whole hog to achieve the desired end goal.



To: steve harris who wrote (235140)6/1/2005 11:50:12 AM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1572191
 
Has the opposing political party proposed any of their own energy plans after rejecting Bush's?

independentsforkerry.org



To: steve harris who wrote (235140)6/1/2005 5:34:59 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572191
 
Has the opposing political party proposed any of their own energy plans after rejecting Bush's?

You are so GD stupid I want to stick you on a boat somewhere in the Pacific so you can play with your navel. The only intent of Bush's energy plan is to undo the very excellent energy plan put into place under Bill Clinton, you ignorant #!@$%^%@%^# clown!