Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (235251)	6/1/2005 2:32:06 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572953

Elroy, Is that the only evidence? If so, please inform us.... See my post to John here: Message 21377531 I've said repeatedly its quite disturbing that the US has never explained (as far as I know) what criterion was used in determining whether a person captured in Afghanistan went to Gitmo, to an Afghan jail, was extradited to their home country or was simply released. If all the Gitmo detainees were most definitely Al Queda, you'd figure the US would at least provide that level of detail. My gues is that anybody fighting the US / Afghan liberation forces would tend to be labeled Taliban if Afghan, and generally sent to Afghan jails. Those not Afghan (fighting with guns) are Al Qaeda and they would tend to be sent to Guantanamo. Joe