Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (102710)	6/2/2005 1:55:39 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 225578

I think 23 acres is allot of land and to have the lake front (is it lakefront property?) is an extra. I think I remember you talking about it in an earlier post (allot earlier) and I'm thinking you said it is in northern Calif? Rural property isn't so easy to buy anymore. It seems to be getting more and more expensive. Our son looked at some property way out in the middle of nowhere (Lake Roosevelt on the Columbia River)............I mean there is NOTHING for miles and miles. A person used to be able to buy around there for $1000. an acre. Now it's up to 25,000-30,000 an acre and climbing. I think the people in this country finally woke up and realized how valuable our nation, and its land is, and they want to own a piece before it's all gone. It's not hard to understand that land isn't being made any more (except on the big island of Hawaii -gg-) I know we got caught up and wanted to buy now while we still work and can get it paid off by the time we retire. I'm not even going to mention the practice of flipping property, which has made property that much more expensive. In any event...............I think you should hold on to your property too and sell it in your old age if you haven't developed it and moved there by then. M