Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (17474)	6/3/2005 8:06:57 AM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 20773

I don't think a "Saddam was right" posture is gonna get you very far. I don' think it is a Saddam was right posture so much as it is a Bush was wrong, ... both of them. TP

To: tsigprofit who wrote (17474)	6/3/2005 5:01:17 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 20773

The Pimping of the President texasobserver.org

To: tsigprofit who wrote (17474)	6/4/2005 2:29:56 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20773

I'm sorry but your comments on April Glaspie's talks with Saddam are incorrect. Saddam lied to her about his intentions to invade. She did not give him a green light to invade although leftwing sites lie about this an awful lot. Saddam was a Soviet client state. I've posted several times on SI the %'s of his weaponry that came from various countries. The Soviet Union and its satellites were #1 by a long shot. France and China were second and third. Rumsfeld handshake means about as much as similar handshakes to various Soviet and Chinese leaders. During the Iran-Iraq war we sold Iraq a lot of grain, some helicopters, and gave them some satellite intel info - only because we didn't want the more extremist state of Iran under Khomeini to conquer Iraq - which was a risk then. Have you bothered to read the text of UNSC Res 1546 which I posted to you?