Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	6/3/2005 5:53:19 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

Can a man who played a significant role in the Enron scandal be the best pick to head the SEC? alternet.org

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	6/5/2005 4:30:16 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 110194

If you think oil prices are a big problem ... _________________________________________________________ Even optimistic predictions suggest the world's crude oil supply will reach its maximum in just 20 years. The U.S. must find other energy sources soon. DenverPost.com Article Last Updated: 6/04/2005 05:12 PM denverpost.com Geologists aren't finding major new oil fields anywhere in the world and most do not expect to do so. Existing fields will reach their maximum output within a few decades. Meanwhile, crude oil is being consumed at an ever-greater pace not only in the United States and Europe, but also in rapidly developing economies like China and India. The combination - falling reserves and rising demand - could produce a global economic crisis unlike any in history. Over the past four years, experts have debated the concept of oil "peaking" - that is the point the world's crude oil output will reach its maximum, after which supplies will inevitably dwindle. Oil is not a renewable resource. It takes nature millions of years to form an oil field, and when the oil is gone, it's really gone. The issue should get far more attention than it has. Instead, the energy legislation recently passed by the U.S. House doesn't even hint at the problem. Despite the Bush administration's efforts to promote additional drilling, the United States can't drill its way out of the mess. Accelerated domestic production just means we will have less oil left to cushion the blow when peaking occurs. The real answer must be development of new fuels and engine technologies. America should invest in such projects and embrace policies that encourage consumers to switch their fuel use and vehicle purchases. There's widespread consensus that peaking will occur globally in the foreseeable future, but disagreement about when it will happen, says a March 2005 report by U.S. Department of Energy consultants. The report cited six experts who say peaking could occur between 2006 and 2010, three who think it will happen between 2010 and 2020, two who say it will hit between 2020 and 2025 and only one who says there will be no peak. Since creating new fuels and engines will take years, even optimistic scenarios leave little time to prepare for the inevitable economic transition. If the world prepares 20 years before peak oil production, the transition likely will be smooth and economic disruptions minor, the report said. Since the most optimistic projections say peaking will happen just 20 years from now, time is running out even under the best scenario. If the world waits until a decade before peaking occurs, the global economy will face significant energy shortages for a 10-year period, the report warned. So if mid-range scenarios are right about when peaking will occur, the global economy already is headed for trouble. But if the world waits until the crisis is imminent, in other words until the oil supply starts to decline in earnest, economic dislocations may last for decades. Conservation will be part of the answer, because postponing the day of reckoning could buy time to develop alternatives. Yet President Bush and the Republican-dominated Congress steadfastly oppose mandating tougher fuel economy standards. It's possible to make gasoline and diesel substitutes from farm products such as corn and soy. But it's unclear if the world's farmers can grow enough materials to significantly offset the crude oil supply. (Daily oil consumption is now a staggering 84 million barrels per day.) Even so, it's obviously worthwhile to encourage a shift from crude oil to biomass fuels, and make alternative fuels more economical and environmentally friendly. Other alternatives also present challenges. For example, oil from tar sands is filled with polluting impurities and requires extensive processing to be made into gasoline. If tar sands are widely developed, their proponents must solve the environmental concerns. Renewable energy such as wind and solar could reduce the need to burn crude oil or even natural gas to generate electricity. But to date, solar-powered vehicles haven't gotten much beyond the experimental stage, and cars powered only by electricity still don't offer the legroom and zoom to attract many consumers. Hybrid vehicles hold great promise because they are partly powered by electricity. Although they currently occupy just a market niche, they're becoming more popular as gas prices rise. Yet the Bush administration seems uninterested in policies that might encourage consumers and businesses to buy (and thus manufacturers to build) more hybrids. The demand for liquid fuels is so massive that none of these alternatives by themselves can replace gasoline and diesel. Taken as a whole, though, they could reduce the demand for crude oil, giving vehicle manufacturers time to invent alternatives to the internal combustion engine before peak oil production occurs. What's needed first, though, is courageous political leadership to focus attention on the problem. Bush and Congress must not squander the years that remain before peak oil production actually occurs. Solving the puzzle must become a national priority.

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	6/5/2005 8:42:50 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 110194

The author of the new book 'The United States of Wal-Mart' has just posted an interesting blog entry... huffingtonpost.com

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	6/7/2005 2:50:00 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

What's going to happen as we start running out of cheap gas to guzzle? rollingstone.com

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	6/7/2005 6:37:00 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

General Motors Corp. is cutting 25,000 jobs and closing an unspecified number of plants over the next 3-1/2 years, CEO Rick Wagoner told shareholders Tuesday, as the world's largest automaker struggles to stem huge losses. money.cnn.com

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	7/13/2005 9:24:52 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 110194

Following The Money cunningrealist.blogspot.com

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (33792)	7/20/2005 12:28:45 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 110194

Dollar/Yen 113.02-113.05 + 0.43 11:44 Dollar Rallies on Yield, Growth Prospects by Ashraf Laidi The dollar rallied on the best of both worlds; traders expecting Fed Chairman Greenspan tomorrow to sound off his usually upbeat assessment for the US economy while reiterating his call for measured tightening of monetary policy. In his reply to Senator Saxton, stating that a flattening yield curve was no fool-proof indication of slowing economic conditions; and that rising oil prices could erode 0.75% of US growth. But traders focused on the prospects of higher dollar interest rates without the risk of interrupting the US expansion, especially at a time when bullish sentiment is boosting US stock indices to their highest level in 4 years.