SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (11064)6/30/2005 2:02:13 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

GDP

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

The Commerce Department just reported the U.S. economy grew
at an inflation-adjusted rate of 3.8 percent last quarter.

Simultaneously, the Department’s measure of inflation ticked down a notch, falling from a prior estimate of 3.2 percent to 2.9 percent. To put that into perspective, back during Jimmy Carter’s error, um, era, inflation ran at an annualized rate of . . . . . 12-plus percent!

The economy has posted the following (annualized) growth rates over the past two years:

3.8 - Q1 2005
3.8 - Q4 2004
4.0 - Q3 2004
3.3 - Q2 2004
4.5 - Q1 2004
4.2 - Q4 2003
7.4 - Q3 2003
4.1 - Q2 2003

polipundit.com

bea.doc.gov

bea.doc.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/2/2005 12:17:20 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Manufacturing Grows at a Faster Rate

By ADAM GELLER, AP Business Writer
Fri Jul 1,12:53 PM ET

NEW YORK - Activity in the nation's factories increased at a faster pace in June, a private research group said Friday, in a fresh signal that the nation's economy continues to expand.

A second report showed construction spending declined for a third straight month in May, but still remains close to its all-time high.

The pickup in manufacturing marked the sector's 25th consecutive month of expansion, according to figures from the Institute for Supply Management. The June upturn follows six consecutive months of slowing growth, the group said.

ISM's manufacturing index registered 53.8 percent in June, up from a reading of 51.4 in May. The new reading was notably higher than the 51.5 figure forecast by analysts.

A reading of 50 or above in the index means the manufacturing sector is expanding. A figure below 50 represents a contraction.

Analysts said the new report offered largely positive news for manufacturing, pointing to a sector that is settling into more normal, sustained expansion.

The ISM reading is "a real good number," said Joel Naroff of Naroff Economic Advisors in Holland, Pa. "What we saw in the first few months of this year was manufacturing was leveling off. It wasn't slowing. It was leveling off. I think this report says it's still in very good shape."

Economists downplayed any contradiction between the manufacturing and construction reports, noting that the latter reflects continued robust activity in new home building.

Adding to that generally upbeat economic snapshot, a fresh reading of consumer confidence Friday by the University of Michigan reportedly rose, according to Dow Jones Newswires. The data, which is only released to subscribers, was said to show a rise in the index to 96.0 from 94.8 at mid-month.

Stocks were mixed following release of the reports. In early afternoon trading, the Dow Jones industrial average rose 32.53, or 0.3 percent, to 10,307.50. The Nasdaq composite index declined 0.73, or 0.04 percent, to 2,056.23. The Standard & Poor's 500 index gained 2.28, or 0.2 percent, to 1,193.61.

In the construction report, the Commerce Department said spending on building fell by 0.9 percent in May, the third consecutive monthly decline.

The drop to a seasonally adjusted annual total of $1.1 trillion surprised economists, who had been forecasting a 0.5 percent increase in spending.

The new report takes a bit of the luster off a construction sector that had been consistently robust. Gains in the previous two months were revised to show declines of 1.1 percent in April and 0.2 percent in March. That was the first time since mid-2002 that construction had fallen for three straight months.

But construction activity remained close to its all-time high of $1.13 trillion at an annual rate, reached in February. Analysts expect building will continue to supply strength to the economy this year provided interest rates do not rise too quickly.

Private construction dropped by 1.6 percent to an annual rate of $856.2 billion after declines of 1.5 percent in April and 0.5 percent in March.

The closely watched figures tracking housing activity dropped by 1.7 percent in May to an annual rate of $614.3 billion following declines of 2.2 percent in April and 1 percent in March.

But those figures were skewed because they now include spending on home improvements, said Gina Martin, financial economist with Wachovia Corp. Such spending is unpredictable, and when it is removed from the equation, spending on new homebuilding has continued to rise, she noted.

Nonresidential construction was down 1.6 percent to $241.9 billion in May with weakness in office construction, commercial, a category that includes shopping centers, and factory construction.

Government building projects rose by 1.7 percent to an annual rate of $246.8 billion, an all-time high. State and local building was up 1.7 percent while federal building projects rose by 0.7 percent.

Meanwhile, the report from the Institute for Supply Management indicated a 44th consecutive month of expansion in the overall economy.

"These are the most positive signs that we have seen in several months, and they indicate that we may be through the 'soft patch' that many observers touted," said Norbert J. Ore, chair of ISM's manufacturing business survey committee.

The reading reflects an increased rate of growth in new orders, and a slowing rise in prices paid by manufacturers for raw materials. At the same time, high energy costs and a strong dollar continue to weigh on the sector, Tempe, Ariz.-based ISM said.

Analysts said the report was generally positive, but prompted limited concerns. It shows exports by U.S. manufacturers are growing more slowly, a potential problem with the dollar strengthening. Employment growth in manufacturing is also flat, the report said.

Of the 20 industry sectors tracked by the group's survey, 13 reported growth in June, including petroleum, textiles, food, wood and wood products, furniture, instruments and photographic equipment, industrial and commercial equipment and computers, rubber and plastic products, chemicals, electronic components and equipment, printing and publishing and primary metals.

A sub-index tracking new orders rose to 57.2 percent from 51.7 percent in May. A sub-index measuring production also increased, reflecting faster growth.

news.yahoo.com
AhdVt9QFbG8MnScmvQML9.6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3bGI2aDNqBHNlYwM3NDk-



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/7/2005 10:34:53 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Good News On A Bad Day: Deficit Continues Falling

posted by Ace
Ace of Spades HQ

I don't know how, but somehow this is all due to that master of Senate procedure, Robert Byrd:

<<<

The good news this week is the unexpected surge in federal tax revenues that is slashing the federal budget deficit by about $100 billion.

This is especially welcome news to supply-side tax-cutters who argued all along that lower tax rates spur stronger economic growth, which, in turn, creates more jobs that increases tax revenues. That is happening now.

It's embarrassing news for President Bush's diehard Democratic critics, who predicted his tax cuts would worsen the budget deficits and drive the government deeper into debt. They argued throughout last year's elections that the tax cuts failed to grow the economy, create jobs or improve fiscal health.

Surely, it has become quite clear they were wrong on all counts -- again. Indeed, it now appears new tax-receipt numbers at the Treasury are showing a sharp increase in individual, corporate and Social Security payments.

Treasury officials say, thus far, in fiscal 2005, which began last Oct. 1, they have taken in nearly $100 billion more than previously projected. Individual tax receipts were up an impressive 21 percent over last year. Business tax revenues rose a whopping 48 percent. They took in a record $61 billion on June 15 alone.

"The numbers are an eye-popping vindication of the Laffer curve [a theoretical correlation between tax rates and growth] and the Bush tax cut's real economic value," tax-cut crusader Stephen Moore wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

What this means is that, despite somewhat higher spending, "The federal deficit could come in at $325 billion to $350 billion, significantly better than the White House $427 billion projection, or the Congressional Budget Office's $400 billion forecast," writes The Washington Post's economics reporter Jonathan Weisman.

Some fiscal experts now predict the deficit could come in at around $300 billion. My own belief is it will be even lower because the economy is growing much faster than expected. Last week, the U.S. Commerce Department reported that, for the first three months of the year, the economy was growing at an annualized 3.8 percent, instead of the 31/2 percent they initially reported. This revised estimate, in the face of Wall Street fears of economic slowing, provided "more ammunition for Republican boasts that their tax cuts are the cause of this performance," Mr. Weisman reported.
>>>

No cowbell or Kim Richards today, alas.

ace.mu.nu

washingtontimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/8/2005 7:47:00 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Job Market Update

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

The Labor Department just released its latest report on the nation’s job markets. As a preliminary matter, the following stats will help put them into perspective:

June 1997

10.4 = unemployment rate among blacks.

7.6 = unemployment among latinos.

5.0 = overall unemployment rate.

$424.03 = average weekly earnings by factory-line workers and non-managers in the services sectors.

Then there’s this:

June 2005

10.3 = unemployment rate among blacks.

5.8 = unemployment among latinos.

5.0 = overall unemployment rate.

$541.22 = average weekly earnings by factory-line workers and non-managers in the services sectors.

The U.S. economy created 146,000 W-2 jobs in June. This year’s net W-2 job gain now amounts to 1,088,000 – or just over 181,000 per month.

Payroll gains in June included new jobs in the following labor sectors and sub-sectors: Commercial banking, legal services, architecture and engineering, accounting and bookkeeping, computer systems, business management and managerial consulting, real estate, and health care services.

When non-payroll jobs are added to the mix (e.g., software consultants; contract salespersons; self-employment), the economy created 163,000 new positions last month, bringing this year’s total employment gain up to 1,482,000.

Back when President Bush first took office, average hourly earnings for production-line workers and non-supervisors in the services sectors were $14.27. As of last month, however, said earnings had grown to $16.06 per hour, thereby posting a total gain of 12.54 percent.

In January 2001, average weekly earnings for non-managers and production-line workers were $481.23. (See here, as revised - ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.03092001.news) As of last month, however, and as stated above, those wages had grown to $541.22, thereby posting a total gain of 12.46 percent.

Whereas total consumer inflation since the President first was sworn into office has risen just barely above 11 percent.

Uh, yeah, you read that correctly. Total wage growth for lower-tiered workers has outpaced total inflation since the Prez first took office. And that says nothing about the higher relative wage-growth rates for managerial-level workers. Nor does it factor in the explosive growth of homeowners’ equity over the past several years. Nor does it take into account higher rates of total *income* growth for all workers (e.g., wages *plus* cash bonuses, after-tax stock dividends, and the like).

Sequential gains in hourly wages for non-managers and factory workers have been posted in 47 of the 53 months which have elapsed since the President’s first inauguration.

{BTW: You too can look up all these stats regarding hourly earnings. Just click here - data.bls.gov Then click on “Total Private Average Hourly Earnings of Production Workers.” Then go to the bottom of the page and click on “Retrieve data."}

Lastly, the nation’s unemployment rate dropped to 5.0 percent in June. That’s less than half of France’s reported (10.1%) unemployment rate. And it’s nearly 60 percent lower than Germany’s reported unemployment rate (11.7%, as adjusted, following the re-classification of their social welfare rolls).

Note: Additional data also can be found here.
data.bls.gov

polipundit.com

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.070997.news

bls.gov

inflationdata.com

mabico.com

news.bbc.co.uk



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/14/2005 11:24:04 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Excerpt Of The Day: The Media's Negative Slant On Economic News

By John Hawkins on Quote Of The Day
Right Wing News

"No, the day after a strong jobs report (search), The New York Times was bemoaning it would most likely keep interest rates ratcheting upward.

I'm not saying that isn't true. But would it kill us in the media to turn it around? That interest rates are going higher, precisely because the economy's going higher?

Would it kill us to report that while gas prices are at a record this week of $2.29 a gallon... they'd have to get up to more than 3 bucks to match the inflation-adjusted Carter years? And would it kill us to add that folks in Europe pay up to three times our level right now?

Would it kill us to note in our "deficits-are-ruining-America" stories, that deficits are actually declining? Maybe a hundred billion less than thought? And that tax revenues are up, precisely because tax rates are down?

Would it kill us to admit that's because more people are working and more people are paying taxes, so the pie just got bigger? No, we curse the pie and dish out the crap. How's that for flaky?

In economic news, that's not being fair and balanced.

Now, I'm not saying, don't report the bad stuff. Just don't make it seem like that's the only stuff." -- Neil Cavuto

rightwingnews.com

foxnews.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/20/2005 6:18:42 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Gloomy

<< Greenspan Signals More Rate Increases >>

Or perhaps not:
   “Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said Wednesday 
the economy should enjoy sustained growth with low
inflation in coming months, a strong condition that will
require incremental increases in interest rates.”
Sustained growth, eh?

Low inflation, huh?

Hooverville.

BTW: In light of that first graf, I can’t help but wonder why our trusty intellectual masters over at the AP decided not to opt for the following headline: “Greenspan Predicts Sustained Economic Growth With Low Inflation Over Next Few Months.”

Oh, right . . .

UPDATE: The Associated Depressed re-wrote that piece after I had linked to it. The quote in this post was from the original prose.

polipundit.com

news.yahoo.com
UWFYZk5v7I3NULVOs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY-



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/22/2005 2:04:27 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Jobless Claims

-- Alexander K. McClure
PoliPundit.com

Initial Jobless Claims are

DOWN 34,000

With the economy strongly moving forward and the budget deficit closing, what domestic issues do the Democrats think they can run on?

Their obstruction on Social Security Reform?

polipundit.com

news.yahoo.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/25/2005 6:34:26 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Or not.

<< Existing Home-Sales Smash Record Again >>

I know, I know.

It’s a nationwide bubble that completely will burst tomorrow, thereby triggering a global depression and proving Bush did, in fact, lie about leaking his TANG records to Halliburton. Or something like that.

Or at least that’s what those tenured economics professors and media pundits keep saying, eh? – right after they order that second bottle of Caymus Special Select over at Aqua or Chez Panisse.

{ahem}

In the meantime:

Don’t worry.
Be happy.

polipundit.com

realtor.org



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/28/2005 9:46:04 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Or not.

{ahem}

Back in mid-July 1997, during the liberal media’s self-proclaimed “greatest economic expansion of all time,”
the four-week moving average of initial claims for state jobless benefits (i.e., layoffs) stood at 324,000. At that point in time the employed workforce totaled 129.822 million persons. Therefore, layoffs were 0.25% of the employed workforce back then.

On the other hand
, as of the end of last week the moving average of initial jobless claims was 318,000. As of June 30, 2005, the employed workforce amounted to 141.638 million persons. Ergo, layoffs presently are right around 0.22% of the employed workforce.

A similar result would be reached
if you compared June 2005 with June 1997. And with May 2005 versus May 1997. And then April 2005 vs. April 1997.

Yeah, that’s correct, Krugman-Dobbs:

As a percentage of the employed workforce fewer people are getting laid off from their jobs, this Spring and Summer, when compared to the exact same portions of Saint Bill’s second term. Heck, as of right now there are fewer *nominal* layoffs, by way of comparison, despite the fact nearly 12 million more people gainfully are employed.

I blame the economy for that.

Lastly, and just to be crystal clear, this really isn’t a post about economics or the job market.

Nope.

It’s a media bias post – in disguise.

For the chances of any one of the scores of regional or national liberal media outlets running this type of analysis in tomorrow’s editions nearly are the same as a silver-spooned liberal media pundit grasping reality:

Zero.point.zero.

Data: here, here, and here.
workforcesecurity.doleta.gov
workforcesecurity.doleta.gov
data.bls.gov

polipundit.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)7/29/2005 2:09:49 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

GDP and More

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

The Commerce Department just reported the U.S. economy grew at an inflation-adjusted rate of 3.4 percent last quarter.

Regarding inflation, in and of itself, the Department’s measuring stick currently reads 2.4 percent. To put that into perspective, back in 1978, when Mr. Haginy told me and my classmates to be worried about “global cooling,” inflation was running at an annualized rate of over 9.0 percent.

The economy has posted the following (annualized) real growth rates over the past thirty months:

3.4 - Q2 2005
3.8 - Q1 2005
3.8 - Q4 2004
4.0 - Q3 2004
3.3 - Q2 2004
4.5 - Q1 2004
4.2 - Q4 2003
7.4 - Q3 2003
4.1 - Q2 2003
1.9 - Q1 2003

On the other hand, if you surveyed a bunch of those 80 year-old lifelong Democrats – you know, the kind of people who hold the surreal distinction of having voted for Harry Truman, on the one hand, and John Kerry, on the other, and who get their economic *news* from the likes of “60 Minutes,” NPR, Lou Dobbs, the Philly Inquirer, and the Detroit Free Press – you’d learn many of them believe the country still is mired in a recession.

No, seriously, many of them actually *believe* we’re still in a recession.

Mmm, hmm.

At that, my friends, is emblematic of one of the primary reasons why the dwindling remnants of the old Democrat Party still are dangerous – 25 years after Carter and 36 years after Chicago.

{sigh}

On the bright side, however, and as Glenn Tipton, Rob Halford, and K.K. Downing once said:

“You don’t have to be old to be wise.”

polipundit.com

bea.doc.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/1/2005 10:20:47 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

US factory activity accelerates

By Christopher Swann in Washington
Mon Aug 1,11:10 AM ET

Growth in the US manufacturing sector accelerated in July, according to the Institute for Supply Management. The ISM index of activity rose to 56.5 in July from 53.8 in June. Economists had been expecting a more modest rise.

A reading above 50 shows that the sector is growing, while a reading below implies contraction.

The ISM data has shown the manufacturing sector expanding for the past 26 months.

The new orders component of the index rose to 60.6 from 57.2. Economists have been expecting orders and production to pick up after a decline in inventories in the second quarter. The figures hinted that companies may have been surprised by the strength of demand in the quarter and had been forced to dig into their inventories. It seems that at the start of the third quarter they may have started to replenish their stock rooms.

This was also born out by the production component of the index which rose to 61.2 from 55.6. The employment component of the index also rose from 49.9 to 53.2.

Employment in the manufacturing sector has been on a downward trend for several years - reflecting the growth of production overseas as companies have shifted to lower cost locations. Most economists expect this weakness to continue but will welcome any interruptions in the trend.

There was also good news on inflation. The prices paid index slid back to 48.5 from 50.5.

news.yahoo.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/1/2005 10:40:01 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Gov't Plans to Borrow Less This Quarter By JEANNINE AVERSA, AP Economics Writer

Mon Aug 1, 5:38 PM ET

WASHINGTON - The government expects to borrow $59 billion from the credit markets this quarter — considerably less than previously estimated, the Treasury Department said Monday.

The improvement mostly reflects higher tax revenues, the department said. The previous borrowing estimate, in May, was $103 billion for the July-to-September quarter.

If the new borrowing projection of $59 billion proves accurate, that would mark the smallest amount of borrowing for the July-to-September period in five years.

The new estimate comes as the economy is enjoying solid growth, which is helping to boost tax revenues. The economy grew by an energetic 3.4 percent annual rate in the April-to-June quarter, the government reported last week. Private economists believe growth will be even better in the current quarter.

Against that backdrop, the White House recently lowered its projection for the federal budget deficit for this year to $333 billion, down from an initial estimate of $427 billion. Last year, the government ran up $412 billion in red ink, a record in dollar terms.

"The buoyant income growth that has accompanied the expanding economy has generated a fiscal dividend," Mark Warshawsky, assistant secretary of the Treasury Department's Office of Economic Policy, said Monday.

"Federal tax receipts have improved dramatically, sharply reducing the budget deficit. Tax receipts in fiscal year 2005 are on track to grow 14 percent — the largest such year-over-year increase in nearly 25 years," he said.

For the upcoming October-to-December quarter, Treasury expects to borrow $97 billion.

Treasury needs to borrow to finance the daily operations of government, including meeting interest payments on the national debt, which now stands at around $7.8 trillion.

The estimates are made as the department considers the government's financing needs, something its does on a quarterly basis. As part of that process, the department is widely expected to announce later this week that it will bring back the 30-year Treasury bond. The department had stopped selling new 30-year bonds in October 2001.

news.yahoo.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/2/2005 1:47:44 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
HOOVERVILLE

The two Americas

Power Line

Donald Lambro of the Washington Times describes them. There's the real America, which has experienced 25 consecutive months of job gains resulting in 3.7 million new jobs, and in which manufacturing, according to both the Fed and the Commerce Department, is surging. And there's the Democrats' America, as depicted by Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry, which is in its worst shape since Hoover thanks to misguided policies, such as free trade, that are destroying our manufacturing base.

There must be more at work here than just partisan politics -- I don't recall Republicans claiming that our economy was sinking during the boom years under President Clinton. I can't improve on Lambro's diagnosis:
   "The answer, unfortunately, is all about the politics of 
pessimism and denial, an illness that has long afflicted
Mrs. Pelosi's party -- to its detriment."
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011223.php

washtimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/5/2005 2:38:48 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

More dismal economic news

By jkelly
Irish Pennants

<<<

AP -- Fewer people signed up for unemployment benefits last week, an encouraging sign that the nation's jobs climate is improving.

The Labor Department reported Thursday that new applications filed for unemployment insurance dropped by a seasonally adjusted 1,000 to 312,000 for the week ending July 30.

The showing was even better than economists were expecting before the release of the report. They were predicting claims for jobless benefits actually would rise.

The latest labor market barometer suggested that companies are feeling pretty good about the economy and thus may be less inclined to lay off workers and more willing to step up hiring.
>>>

I blame Bush.

irishpennants.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/5/2005 9:22:22 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
HOOVERVILLE

That damn Bush....

By jkelly
Irish Pennants

....is ruining the economy.

<<<

Employers expanded their payrolls by 207,000 in July, the most in five months, while unemployment rate held steady at 5 percent, the government reported Friday.

The latest snapshot from the Labor Department offered strong evidence that the job climate is improving considerably.

Revised figures released Friday for May and June showed that payroll gains in those months proved stronger than previously thought. The number of jobs increased by 126,000 in May and 166,000 in June.
>>>

irishpennants.com

news.yahoo.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/5/2005 8:57:10 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Bush Economy

-- Alexander K. McClure
PoliPundit.com

207,000 new jobs

Next stop: Hooverville
****

Raw Math

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Following up on Alex McClure’s post about the creation of 207,000 net W-2 jobs, last month, I figured I’d go ahead and provide more of a bird’s eye view of the poli-economic issues about which Lou Dobbs, Paul Krugman, and Leigh Strope are in complete denial:

Background/Perspective

137.771 million = Total employment as of Jan. 2001.
142.076 million = Total employment as of July 2005.

Ergo:

4,305,000 = net gain in total employment (payroll and non-payroll jobs) since January 2001.

Of that net gain in total employment, 1,332,000 have been non-farm payroll jobs.

Regarding that gain of 1,332,000 non-farm payroll jobs, since January 2001, the following high-paying sectors and subsectors have added net W-2 positions:

Finance and insurance = + 349,700 net payroll jobs.
Legal services = 91,000.
Engineering and architecture = 43,900.
Construction = 418,000.
Real estate = 138,100.
Health care = 1,312,000.

And that’s despite the dot com meltdown, 9/11, those corporate scandals, and oil and gas prices.

July 2005

The economy created 438,000 net jobs last month, of which 207,000 were on non-farm payrolls (as stated above). That brings this calendar year’s net job creation to 1,337,000 (payroll) and 1,920,000 (payroll and non-payroll).

In other words, this year the economy is averaging net gains of 191,000 jobs per month (on payrolls) and 274,000 jobs per month (on and off payrolls).

Net payroll job gains in July were posted in the following high-compensation sectors and subsectors: Commercial banking, securities and investments, real estate, legal services, accounting, computer design systems, architecture and engineering, business management, construction, and health care.

The unemployment rate remained at 5.0% last month.

Over the past year, weekly wages for lower-tiered employees (i.e., production-line workers and non-managers in the services sectors) have risen by 2.7 percent. That’s in line with total consumer inflation, which also posted an increase of 2.7 percent over the same period. (See here.)
inflationdata.com

Labor data: Here, here, and here.
bls.gov
data.bls.gov
bls.gov

polipundit.com
quote.bloomberg.com
polipundit.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/5/2005 9:04:53 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
News You Won’t See in Print

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Check this out:

July 1997

4.2 = unemployment among whites.
9.4 = for blacks.
7.9 = for latinos.

On the other hand, there’s this:

July 2005

4.3 = unemployment among whites.
9.5 = for blacks.
5.5 = for latinos.

Hmm, what a comparatively-racist economy . . . under Clinton.

But, of course, this really isn’t a post about the economy or the job markets.

Nope.

As the title so clearly indicates, this is a media bias post.

For the chances of the national partisan-liberal media conducting this analysis, or reporting these stats, nearly are the same as a trust-fund “librulz” perma-student grasping reality:

Zero.point.zero.

polipundit.com

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.080197.news

bls.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/11/2005 3:52:38 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Annual Budget Deficit Reduced by 24 Percent

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Huh?

What’cha?

Mmm, hmm. It’s true.

As of July 2004, the federal gumbmint had run a budget deficit of 396.3 billion dollars.

As of last month, however, the gumbmint’s annual budget deficit was 302.6 billion dollars.

Hence the title of this post.

I blame the economy for the sharply-reduced deficit. And, incidentally, the upcoming fiscal year’s semi-austerity budget has not even gone into effect.

BTW:

No, I don’t believe everything is perfect on the fiscal policy front.

And this actually is a media bias post. The details of the deficit numbers are peripheral to its major premise.

For the chances of any one of the scores of national liberal media outlets running the exact same headline I just did nearly are as slim as Kate Moss after a bulemia session.

Data: Here.
fms.treas.gov

polipundit.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)8/31/2005 4:33:09 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Gloomy and Depressed

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Or not.

<< The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index Rebounds in August >>

Gee, only the highest reading in four years, huh?

Hooverville.

polipundit.com

conference-board.org



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)9/2/2005 2:44:16 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

The Job Market

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com
August 2005

The economy created 373,000 net jobs last month, of which 169,000 were on non-farm payrolls. The unemployment rate fell to 4.9 percent. That’s less than half the reported unemployment rate of Les Francais, and it’s roughly 60% lower than Germany’s reported unemployment rate.

Net payroll job creation last month was posted in the following, high-paying labor sectors and subsectors: Commercial banking, legal services, securities and investments, accounting, computer systems design, architecture and engineering, health care, real estate, and construction.

Wage Growth

Regarding lower-tiered workers (i.e., non-managers in the services sectors and production-line workers in the factory sector), average hourly earnings rose in August for the twentieth consecutive month. Over the past year, such earnings have risen 2.7 percent. That’s less than, but roughly in line with, the total consumer inflation rate, which has posted an increase of 3.17 percent over the same period. (See here.)
inflationdata.com

2005 - Aggregate

Over the past eight months, the economy has created 2,293,000 net jobs, of which 1,550,000 have been on non-farm payrolls. The following labor sectors have added substantial quantities of net W-2 jobs during that period:

68,100 = Finance and insurance.
189,300 = Health care services.
176,000 = Construction.
36,700 = Real estate.

Perspective

August 1997

4.2 = unemployment rate for whites.
9.3 = for blacks.
7.2 = for latinos.
4.9 = overall unemployment rate.

On the other hand:

August 2005

4.2 = unemployment rate for whites.
9.6 = for blacks.
5.8 = for latinos.
4.9 = overall unemployment rate.

Note: Additional raw data - here and here.
bls.gov
data.bls.gov

polipundit.com

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.090597.news

bls.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)9/14/2005 2:01:47 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Annual Budget Deficit Reduced by More Than 19 Percent

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Yep.

$437.46 billion = annual federal budget deficit - August 2004.

$352.56 billion = annual federal budget deficit - August 2005.

Hence the title of this post.

But this really isn’t a post about the deficit.

Nope.

This is a media bias post.

The chances of any one of the scores of national or regional liberal media outlets running the exact same headline I just did nearly are as the same as a trust-fund liberal chicken(deficit)hawk putting their money where their mouth is, actually effectuating the “common good,” as opposed merely to whining and complaining, and thereby deigning to send their huge home equity windfall directly to the federal gummint:

Zero.point.zero.

Data: Here.
fms.treas.gov

polipundit.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)10/14/2005 1:27:05 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
HOOVERVILLE

Where to Go For Good News About the American Economy

Pravda, where else?

Power Line

<<<

The euro rate dropped to its all-time minimum over the recent two years on the Russian market on Tuesday. *** "[W]orld central banks have recently changed their attitude to the European currency and looked at it in a more critical way," [Elena Khrupova, an analyst with BrokerCreditService] said. Such a change has been caused with the ongoing political crisis in Germany. *** To crown it all, the chairman of the European Central Bank Jean Claude Trichet stated Monday that the EU's economic development potential was close to the level of 2 percent, but not 2.5 percent as it was supposed before.

The fast rise of the US dollar occurred not only because of the negative news about the European economy: the dollar went up against the background of positive news about the American economy. The US currency started strengthening in the world after the publication of data about the September index of industrial activity in the USA. "The index was expected to slide after the destructive hurricanes. However, it showed a considerable increase of up to 59.4 points vs. 53.6 points in July. It is noteworthy that the majority of market analysts were expecting a reduction to 52.0 points," Elena Khrupova said.

High prices on fuel and the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina have obviously exerted their negative influence on companies' activities. Specialists believe, though, that it is only a temporal phenomenon. The basic factors, which make the US industry move ahead and develop, are still stable. The unexpectedly registered economic growth also testifies to the fast recreation of the American economy after the two hurricanes, which obviously adds more optimism for the US currency, specialists say.
>>>

You can link to Pravda and dozens of other international newspapers, in English, at Power Line News.
powerlineblognews.com

powerlineblog.com

english.pravda.ru



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)10/27/2005 9:58:20 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
HOOVERVILLE

Strong Economic Growth Continues

Power Line

This is sort of a dog-bites-man story, but GDP figures for the first quarter have been revised upward, and now show a growth rate of 3.5%. This means that the high energy prices prevailing at that time did not slow the economy as much as had been expected, and testifies once again to the strength of the current economic expansion, which has now continued for four years.

powerlineblog.com

washingtonpost.com

bea.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)10/28/2005 9:24:08 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

More Good Economic News

Power Line

The economy surged in the third quarter, growing at a 3.8% rate, better than economists had predicted:

<<<

Growth in the third quarter was broad-based, reflecting brisk spending by consumers, businesses and government.

The expansion in gross domestic product in the July-to-September quarter, the strongest since the beginning of the year, also exceeded many analysts' expectations. Before the report was released, they were forecasting the economy to clock in at a 3.6 percent annual rate.
>>>

Given that growth last quarter was obviously impacted by hurricanes and high energy prices, the economy is showing remarkable strength. Which is of vastly more importance, in every way, than whatever indictments do or do not come out of Patrick Fitzgerald's grand jury.

powerlineblog.com

breakingnews.nypost.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)10/31/2005 9:44:31 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

When was the last time that we had 10 consecutive quarters with economic growth over 3%?

Betsy's Page

If you thought that it was in the 1990s, Bizzy Blog informs us, guess again. It just happened with this last quarter. The only time previously was in the 1980s under Reagan. As Bizzy Blog, asks, When will this economy start getting some respect? With all the dislocations from the Gulf Coast and that the gas prices putting a drag on the economy, it just seems to keep jogging along.

I know that doesn't mean that the economy is great for everyone and we still have to tamp down on the spending, but isn't it possible that we are not getting a complete picture from the doom and gloom media on the state of the economy? Makes one suspect that there really is something to this report by two economists that showed that the media consistently gives more negative press to the economy under a Republican president than a Democratic one even when the numbers are basically the same.

betsyspage.blogspot.com

bizzyblog.com

aei.org



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)11/10/2005 4:22:49 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Budget Deficit Falls by 17.57 Percent

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Huh?

What’cha?

Yep.

October 2004 = $57.300 billion deficit.
October 2005 = $47.231 billion deficit.

Spending was flat on a year-over-year basis. While revenues for the gummint (i.e., tax receipts) were up sharply.

Of course, as any long-term reader of this blog will know this really isn’t a post about the deficit. Or it’s only about the deficit in part.

Let me put it this way:

How many people saw the same headline I wrote anywhere – *anywhere* – in the national media???

Note: Data here.
fms.treas.gov

polipundit.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)11/21/2005 11:18:14 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Or not:

<<<

Three years of strong revenue growth have left many states with large surpluses. New Mexico is looking at a $1 billion surplus. Florida expects more than $3 billion.

Even financially troubled California took in $3.4 billion more than it spent in the budget year that ended June 30 – the state’s first surplus since 2000. California’s deficit was erased by a 13.2% revenue increase.

‘Every month we’re surprised by the good news and say it has to slow down. But it hasn’t,’ says Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, chairman of the National Governor’s Association. His state had record revenue in October and expects a $200 million surplus this year.

* * *

Most decisions on what to do with the surpluses will be made starting in January when governors present budgets and legislatures meet again.

Nearly every state is considering tax cuts. What’s not in favor: big reductions in [state] income tax rates. Instead, smaller cuts aimed at property taxes, business taxes and sales taxes on food are under consideration ….
>>>

Wait a minute.

Waaait a minute.

Aren’t we supposed to be mired in some kind of depression?

Didn’t Krugmanoia write a book only two years ago entitled “The Great Unraveling?”

Wasn’t Colorado Gov. Bill Owens stumping for a de facto tax hike only *weeks ago* on the grounds that his state allegedly was heading towards some type of fiscal abyss?

I’m shocked! to learn most states are sooooo flush with money from the four-year economic expansion and two-year job market boom they’re actually having to figure out ways to give back some of those dollars to Joe and Jane Taxpayer.

polipundit.com

usatoday.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)11/28/2005 9:59:39 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Strong Retail Numbers Buried Even As Actual Sales Blew Away Conservative Forecasts

Posted by Ken Shepherd
NewsBusters.org
November 28, 2005

Strong "Black Friday" showings across America were given short shrift by the Washington Post this "Cyber Monday" which buried the story in a four-paragraph blurb on page A10 in the District and Maryland home edition.

But not only were the numbers good in comparison to last year, they far surprassed the expectations of the National Retail Federation (NRF), the industry group which analyzes and forecasts the performance of the American retail industry.

[see more after jump]
newsbusters.org

Last Tuesday the NRF forecasted that "up to 130 million consumers will go holiday shopping this weekend." We know now that 145 million turned out and that according to an NRF-commissioned survey, "the average shopper spent $302.81 this weekend, bringing total weekend spending to $27.8 billion, an incredible 21.9 percent increase over last year’s $22.8 billion."

By and large the media have reported a little bit on strong retail numbers, albeit without playing up the story and the significance of better-than-forecasted retail holiday spending.

Meanwhile, some network reporters like CBS's Joie Chen are still stuck on high gas prices that, well, aren't really so high anymore.

newsbusters.org

washingtonpost.com

nrf.com

nrf.com

freemarketproject.org



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)11/30/2005 5:05:02 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

THE ECONOMY, IT ROARED

Jonah Goldberg
The Corner

Third Quarter GDP has been revised upward:

<<<

Nov. 30 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. economic growth rose at a 4.3 percent annual rate from July through September, the quickest since the first quarter of last year and evidence of the economy's resilience in the face of record energy costs.

The revised figure for gross domestic product, the value of all goods and services produced in the U.S., was higher than forecast and compares with a 3.8 percent pace initially estimated, the Commerce Department's figures showed today. Growth was 3.3 percent in the prior three months.
>>>

corner.nationalreview.com

quote.bloomberg.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)12/2/2005 5:01:11 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

I blame Bush!!!

Impressive economic growth

TODAY'S EDITORIAL
The Washington Times
December 2, 2005

The Commerce Department reported Wednesday that the economy grew at an upwardly adjusted annual rate of 4.3 percent during the July-September period. It was the 10th consecutive quarter during which the annualized growth rate has registered at least 3.3 percent. Over the same two-and-a-half-year period, the U.S. economy has grown at an average rate of 4.1 percent a year.

Final sales, which removes the change in private inventories from GDP and thus offers an even better indication of growth trends, rose by an even more impressive 4.7 percent during the third quarter, following a roaring 5.6 percent increase during the April-June period. It is also worth noting that the third-quarter performance included the first month following Katrina's Aug. 29 devastation of the energy-intensive Gulf Coast region. The resulting oil-and-gas supply shock caused energy prices to soar, but there appeared to be little adverse impact upon the quarter's growth rate. Indeed, America's economic performance over the past two-and-a-half years has been all the more remarkable considering that the period's 4-percent-plus annual growth rate has had to overcome rising crude-oil prices, which have doubled over the period from less than $31 per barrel (refiner acquisition cost) in March 2003 to more than $61 this past September.

Beyond the seemingly irrepressible consumer, whose outlays increased by 4.2 percent during the third quarter, business investment spending jumped by 8.8 percent. Over the last 10 quarters, business spending has increased by more than 24 percent, rising at an annual rate of nearly 10 percent.

Since nonfarm payrolls essentially bottomed out during the summer of 2003, the rise in employment has been as impressive as the economy's growth rate. Average monthly nonfarm payrolls during the third quarter of 2005, for example, exceeded their levels two years earlier by more than 4 million workers. Over the same period, nonfarm business productivity increased by 5.2 percent. Thus, the rise in employment has been accompanied by an even greater surge in productivity.

Despite skyrocketing oil prices during recent years, the Commerce Department's third-quarter report reveals that the Federal Reserve so far has succeeded in preventing energy-sector price inflation from spilling over into the rest of the economy. The core personal-consumption-expenditure price index, which excludes the volatile energy and food sectors, increased at an annual rate of 1.2 percent during the third quarter. That represents a welcome deceleration from the 1.7 percent annualized rate for the second quarter.

With an economic growth rate above 4 percent, an overall GDP inflation rate below 3 percent for the year and an unemployment rate currently at 5 percent, the performance of the U.S. economy has understandably been the envy of the developed world.

washtimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)12/6/2005 8:45:13 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

More Good News For The Economy

By Katie MacGuidwin
GOP.com Blog

The Detroit News reports this morning “The productivity of American workers shot up at the fastest pace in two years during the July-September quarter, helping to ease fears that inflation pressures were threatening to get out of hand.”

This report from the Labor Department is more in a series of good news that has indicated the economy is making impressive gains as America moves in to the new year. President Bush said in his speech yesterday at The John Deere-Hitachi Construction Machinery Corporation that the economy grew a striking 4.3% this quarter.

gop.com

detnews.com

gop.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)1/5/2006 2:19:58 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

or not.

{ahem}

Check out these items:

1) Initial Claims for Jobless Benefits

In the week ending Dec. 31 [2005], the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims [for jobless benefits] was 291,000, a decrease of 35,000 from the previous week’s revised figure . . . . . The 4-week moving average [of initial jobless claims] was 316,750, a decrease of 9,250 from the previous week’s revised average…..

Even the spaced-out liberal media couldn’t spin that data too far away from reality:


    “New jobless claims plunge to 5-year low“
(On the other hand, Martin Crutsinger of the Associated Depressed didn’t take that news as well as his colleagues did over at Reuters. He threw down his first contrarian “but” merely twenty-four *words* into his self-therapy session on the subject.)

To put those numbers into a bit more perspective, keep in mind that total net employment is higher these days, by roughly five million jobs, when compared to the level of total employment that prevailed in Dec. 2000. (See here.)

data.bls.gov

Furthermore, back in December 2000 the four-week moving average of initial claims for jobless benefits, i.e., layoffs, was upwards of 350,000, as opposed to its current level of under 320,000. (See here.)

workforcesecurity.doleta.gov

IOW, millions upon millions of *more* people are working but *fewer* people are getting laid off.

Go figure.

2) Growth in the Services Sectors

Non-manufacturing business activity increased for the 33rd consecutive month in December [2005]. Business Activity[, Employment,] and New Orders increased at faster rates in December than in November.

3) Growth in the Manufacturing Sector

Economic activity in the manufacturing sector grew in December [2005] for the 31st consecutive month, while the overall economy grew for the 50th consecutive month, say the nation’s supply executives….

4) Net Wealth

To top it off, as Poli noted earlier today, total net wealth for Americans reached yet another all-time high last year.

* * *

I blame the economy for all of this.

Oh, right, I also assign at least some degree of blame to the various conservative fiscal and economic policies implemented since George Dubya Bush took office five years ago, e.g., multiple tax cuts, multiple free trade statutes, rollbacks of job-killing enviro regs, etc.

What say you, Krugman-Chomsky?

polipundit.com

workforcesecurity.doleta.gov

news.yahoo.com

news.yahoo.com

ism.ws

ism.ws

polipundit.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)1/6/2006 2:27:23 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Tax Cuts - Job Growth

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

President Bush’s major slate of tax cuts – which included massive tax breaks for small businesses – were enacted back in May 2003.

Yeah, I know, that particular GOP accomplishment was so long ago, many of the dead felons who voted multiple times for John Kerry – in Philly, Milwaukee and Detroit – hadn’t yet obtained their paroles.

But that’s not germane to this post.

The effect of those tax cuts on total non-farm payroll employment can be illustrated as follows:

Total Payroll Jobs

May 2000 - 131.9 million.
May 2001 - 132.2 million.
May 2002 - 130.3 million.
May 2003 - 129.8 million.
May 2004 - 131.4 million.
May 2005 - 133.4 million.
Dec. 2005 - 134.5 million.

Go figure.

Note: Raw data here.

data.bls.gov
* * *

News You Won’t See in Print

Speaking of the labor markets, check this out:

December 1997

3.9 = whites.
9.9 = blacks.
7.5 = latinos.

On the other hand, there’s this:

December 2005

4.3 = whites.
9.3 = blacks.
6.0 = latinos.

Those are unemployment rates.

Who could have imagined we had such a comparatively-racist set of labor markets . . . under Clinton???

polipundit.com

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.010998.news

bls.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)1/10/2006 1:07:02 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

11,000

NEW YORK POST
Editorial
January 10, 2006

In yet another nod to what Democrats blithely assert is "the worst economy since Herbert Hoover," the Dow Jones Industrial Average yesterday closed above 11,000 for the first time since before 9/11.

The red-hot economy is a welcome reprieve from what has otherwise dominated the still-young news cycle of 2006 — notably the tragedy of the Sago Mine and Jack Abramoff's plea bargain.

Stocks started the year with the strongest weekly gains in seven months. The rally continued yesterday, with the Dow closing at 11,011.90, nearing its all-time high of 11,750.28, set on Jan. 14, 2000.

But don't expect a replay of the 1990s-style reporting of an "economic miracle."

The increasing wealth of American portfolios is exactly the type of story the media forget to mention when Republicans are in office.

Rather, the current doom-and-gloom refrain is that of Americans taking on risky and unprecedented levels of debt.

Yet, to look at household debt without considering household assets makes very little sense.

And American wealth is at an all-time high, according to the latest Federal Reserve "Flow of Funds" report, which analyzes the net worth of American households — assets minus debt.

Total U.S. household wealth now stands at an eyepopping $51 trillion. For perspective, 10 years ago it was roughly half that.

Congress passed President Bush's tax cuts on capital gains, dividends and marginal tax rates in 2003. Job growth, investment and — yes — profits quickly soared. Americans across all income levels became wealthier.

This is a nuanced subject, to be sure, and the dangers of renewed inflation or eventual recession can never be discounted.

But an "economic miracle" has occurred, and the tax cuts played a big role.

Time for another round?

nypost.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)1/24/2006 5:48:39 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Empty Prophecies of Gloom

The pessimist chatter may be increasing, but this economy is decidedly strong.

By David Gitlitz
National Review Online

The U.S. stock market fell sharply last Friday as worries that a confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program could cut off exports from that key oil supplier. Crude oil prices, meanwhile, have climbed to more than $68 per barrel. No doubt, a continued escalation of oil prices such as we’ve seen in recent weeks — the price is up more than $10 in the past month — would at some point pose a real threat to this economy’s extraordinary vitality. Certainly, the possibility of such an exogenous shock can’t be entirely ruled out, but that may be the only way the mainstream media’s relentless prophecies of economic gloom will come to fruition.

For the past couple of years it’s been a rough ride for the economic pessimists and their handmaidens in the media, people who have utterly failed to comprehend the fundamental shift in the economic landscape set off by George W. Bush’s slashing of the tax burden on capital formation. In the nine quarters since Bush enacted the cuts in capital gains and dividend taxes in mid-2003, which with the stroke of a pen boosted the after-tax returns on risk-taking, real quarterly economic growth has averaged 3.7 percent. In the previous nine quarters it averaged only 1.6 percent. Nevertheless, for hide-bound stalwarts of the dismal science, it’s been a never-ending campaign to spy the seeds of economic decline around every corner.

The latest spate of pessimism surfaced last week when the Wall Street Journal — which has been a ready outlet for the doomsayers in recent months — devoted a front-page piece to a group of economic forecasters who see a “marked slowdown in the works.” According to these naysayers, a cooling of growth late last year represented a trend shift that will pull the economy down to a growth rate of less than 3 percent this year.

It’s doubtful, however, that the economy slowed in any real sense in the fourth quarter last year. Yes, there was a drop in non-auto retail sales, which rose at an annual rate of just 1.9 percent in the final three months of 2005. This reputed softness in consumer spending has compelled the Wall Street economic fraternity to reduce their estimates of fourth-quarter GDP growth, which will be announced this Friday, to a rate approaching 3 percent, down from 4.1 percent in the third quarter.

It’s quite possible, however, that the reported sluggishness of “the consumer” reflects nothing more than short-run data volatility arising from the hurricane-related dislocations of late last summer. Friday’s GDP release might garner headlines for showing a significant decline in the growth rate, but there is scant evidence available to confirm that the overall pace of economic expansion fell back significantly in the final three months of last year.

A slowing economy, for example, would not likely be throwing off the kind of revenue growth now being reported by the Treasury. Tax receipts in the fourth quarter were up nearly 9 percent from a year earlier, with the Treasury recording an $11 billion surplus in December. In addition, the labor market is now showing hallmarks of the robust health considered so exceptional in the late 1990s, including weekly initial jobless claims falling below 300,000.

Industrial sectors of the economy are also showing renewed vibrancy, in particular gaining from a revival of capital investment activity. While industrial production grew overall by 3.8 percent in the fourth quarter, up from 1.5 percent in the third, a gain of more than 9 percent in business equipment manufacturing was even more encouraging. It appears that production in this critical area has ramped up to meet the capital-goods needs of American enterprise in expansion mode. This is consistent with more sensitive, market-based indicators that are capturing an investment setting where strong expected returns are fostering greater risk tolerance, which is so crucial to the growth-sustaining capital-formation process. This bolsters confidence that the distortions which might have contributed to an apparent slowing in fourth-quarter growth are very likely to prove short-lived.

The current climate of dynamic risk-taking, capital formation, and wealth creation points to a long-run era of vigorous economic expansion. But that’s not to say the risks are completely absent. An exogenous event such as a sustained surge in energy prices could conceivably take down this economy. But almost invariably, economic downturns result from government policy error, whether monetary, fiscal, or trade related. At this point, with the price of gold above $550 — up about $175 in a little more than two years — the most pressing risk is the potential of policy error from the Federal Reserve. If recent speculation that the central bank is prepared to call an end to its rate-hiking cycle is proven correct, the pause could end up being short-lived. If the lagged effects of the Fed’s long hyper-easy posture show up in the core inflation data, policymakers may have no choice but to re-start the rate-raising process, potentially overshooting the economy’s tolerance for higher rates.

There is also the question of whether or not Congress will extend the dividend and capital-gains tax cuts that have been so vital to the accelerated pace of expansion over the past two and a half years. While the current tax rates don’t expire until 2008, the prospect of higher levies ahead would have to be priced into the present value of financial assets, reducing expected investment returns, raising the cost of capital, and quite likely significantly slowing the rate of growth.

— David Gitlitz is chief economist of Trend Macrolytics LLC, an independent economics and investment-research firm.

nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)2/4/2006 4:05:42 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Tax Cuts - Job Growth

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

      "Unemployment Rate Drops to 4 1/2-Year Low"
President Bush’s major tax cuts – which included massive breaks for small businesses – were enacted back in May 2003.

Yeah, I know, that particular GOP accomplishment was so long ago, Sen. Robert Byrd still thought the term “integration” had something to do with mathematics.

But that’s not germane to this post.

The effect of those tax cuts can be illustrated as follows:

Total Payroll Jobs

May 2000 - 131.9 million.
May 2001 - 132.2 million.
May 2002 - 130.3 million.
May 2003 - 129.8 million.
May 2004 - 131.4 million.
May 2005 - 133.4 million.
Jan. 2006 - 134.4 million.

Note: Raw data here.

data.bls.gov
* * *

Oh, yeah, I almost forgot:

January 1998

4.0 = whites.
9.3 = blacks.
6.9 = latinos.

On the other hand, there’s this:

January 2006

4.1 = whites.
8.9 = blacks.
5.8 = latinos.

Those are unemployment rates.

Who could have dreamed the nation’s “first black president” had presided over such a comparatively-*racist* set of labor markets???

What do you think about that, Chomsky-Churchill?

polipundit.com

news.yahoo.com

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.020698.news

bls.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)2/13/2006 8:56:49 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Solid economic bearings

By Donald Lambro
The Washington Times
Commentary
February 13, 2006

The resilient U.S. economy remains the envy of the industrialized world, but it gets no respect from a majority of the American people.

The economy is healthy and growing, unemployment is falling, factory orders are surging, exports are rising, inflation is relatively tame, average hourly earnings have risen, interest rates are low by historical standards, and home sales, despite a cooling off, are still at record levels.

Yet polls show most Americans think the economy is worse than it was, and a majority continues to give President Bush low marks for the job he is doing to correct it.


The Gallup Poll reported last week the public by better than 2-to-1 (64 percent to 28 percent) thinks things have gotten "worse" in the last five years, and about half of those say "it's because of an economic-related factor."

Notably, among those who said things have gotten better, 42 percent cited an improved economy and jobs.

Still, Mr. Bush's overall marks on economic issues are poor (in the high 30s or low 40s) and the question is: Why? White House advisers think his numbers are driven down by Iraq and as long as that remains a divisive issue among Americans it will continue to pull Mr. Bush's other scores down with it.

But I think more is going on here that just the war in Iraq. Americans clearly have a disproportionately sour view of the economy that is sharply at odds with reality, at least on a national basis. One can understand why voters in Michigan, for example, think the economy stinks -- because of the state's nearly 7 percent jobless rate, or in Mississippi where unemployment is more than 9 percent.

When seen from a higher elevation, however, a sharper picture of the nation's economy comes into focus. It can't be seen through one state's statistics, or even in short-term data, but instead must be viewed over the entire five years of Mr. Bush's presidency. And on this basis, the best numbers we have show a healthy entrepreneurial economy -- though, unfortunately, that's not how it is reported on the nightly news or by the rest of the news media. Let's look at the stats:

The unemployment rate in January fell to 4.7 percent as employers stepped up their hiring across the board -- in construction, manufacturing, professional and business services, education and health care -- adding nearly 200,000 jobs to the labor force. Since 2003, when the tax cuts fully went into effect, 4.7 million jobs have been created.

Factory orders, a pivotal measurement of our economic health, rose 1.1 percent in December, following an even higher 3.3 percent gain in November. Orders shot up by 8.1 percent for all of 2005 and 9.7 percent in 2004. Who says we aren't making anything anymore?

The economy has been growing better than 3% percent a year, faster than any of the major industrial nations of Europe or the Pacific Rim democracies. It's likely to grow as much this year, possibly by 4 percent or more due to improving exports.

The housing market has cooled somewhat, but it couldn't maintain the overheated pace of the past few years. The dire predictions of a housing bubble bursting and home values collapsing have not come to pass. Home sales remain in record territory. More Americans own their home today -- more than two-thirds -- than ever before in U.S. history.

The price of oil was falling nicely last year until the fears of a sudden interruption in oil supplies from Iran rattled the futures markets. Last week, the price began to tumble again. The administration is signaling its desire to sell oil and gas leases in the Eastern Gulf waters where huge reserves remain untapped.

The critical news, which gets lost in the market hysteria over impending fuel shortages, is that U.S. oil and gasoline inventories have been climbing, which will eventually apply downward pressure on pump prices.

Government deficits and debt are the bogeymen of the doom-and-gloom conmen who like to wreak political havoc, especially in the stock and bond markets. But the feds are expecting higher tax receipts of $2.4 trillion next year, though I think that estimate will prove well below the final figure because of higher-than-expected economic growth from a booming global economy.

Look for another $100 billion cut in the budget deficit that will continue shrinking as a share of a nearly $14 trillion-a-year economy.

The bottom line is the economy is strong and getting stronger. The tax cut pills Mr. Bush prescribed in 2001 were just the right medicine for an ailing economy that has taken some very hard body blows in the last five years but has bounced back faster than the pessimists said it would.

It's time for those doubting Americans to take a fresh look at a vibrant, innovative, bullish economy that deserves much more respect than it has gotten so far.

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

washingtontimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)3/11/2006 3:05:19 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Labor

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Here’s some info you won’t see if you get your “news” from the media:

February 1998


3.9 - Whites.
9.7 - Blacks.
6.8 - Latinos.

On the other hand:

February 2006

4.1 - Whites.
9.3 - Blacks.
5.5 - Latinos.

Those are unemployment rates.

So, tell us, Ward Churchill, how do you feel about the comparatively-racist set of labor markets we had back in the 1990’s?


polipundit.com

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/empsit.030698.news

bls.gov



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)4/4/2006 6:02:33 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

More Good News About The Economy Democrats Will Deny

Posted by Matt
Blogs for Bush

Democrats need not pay attention to the good economy behind the curtain...

<<< Manufacturing expanded in March but at a slower rate, while February construction spending rose to a record level, together signaling continued strength in the overall economy despite some evidence of inflation. The Institute for Supply Management said Monday its manufacturing index registered 55.2 last month compared with 56.7 in February. [...]

Also Monday, the government reported that construction spending rose to a record level in February as home building hit an all-time high. >>>


We've had so many different indications that the economy is strong and doing well, and the Democrats find every single ridiculous way to spin the news as if we're in the middle of another Great Depression.

blogsforbush.com

news.yahoo.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)4/6/2006 5:22:50 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

US Jobless Claim Rate At Six Year Low

By Ian on US News
Expose the Left

Unsurprisingly being underreported:


<<< WASHINGTON — The number of Americans filing claims for unemployment benefits fell for a third straight week, providing further evidence of a strong job market.

The Labor Department reported Thursday that 299,000 laid-off workers applied for jobless benefits last week, down 5,000 from the previous week after declines of 8,000 and 7,000 in the two previous weeks.

The total number of Americans receiving benefits dipped to 2.44 million, the lowest level in six years, signaling that the labor market has posted a strong rebound after the blows received last year from the Gulf Coast hurricanes.

The government will report Friday on unemployment for March. Analysts believe the economy created a solid 198,000 jobs last month, down slightly from the 243,000 jobs created in February. The unemployment rate is expected to remain unchanged at 4.8 percent. >>>

exposetheleft.com

boston.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)4/6/2006 8:01:28 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Welfare Rolls In New York Falling Again

-- Lorie Byrd
PoliPundit.com

I blame George Bush for this:


<<< The number of New York City residents receiving public assistance fell to 402,281 last month, the lowest number since December 1964, at the start of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s war on poverty, and a decline of nearly two-thirds from its peak of nearly 1.2 million in March 1995, officials announced yesterday.

After falling sharply during the mayoralty of Rudolph W. Giuliani, when more than 600,000 people left the rolls, the city’s caseload began to creep upward in September 2002, during Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s first year in office and on the tail of a national recession. The modest increases continued until October 2004, when the caseload figure again started to decline.

The recent drop in the number of welfare recipients in the city comes months before the 10th anniversary of the federal welfare overhaul that imposed a five-year limit on assistance, established work requirements and gave states discretion in setting welfare policy. Nationally, the caseload has fallen by more than half since the federal law was signed in August 1996. >>>


Update: Here is another Hooverville headline for you, “Nasdaq, S&P Close at New Five-Year Highs.”

polipundit.com

nytimes.com

news.yahoo.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)4/11/2006 5:15:16 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Economy Producing Good Jobs

Posted by Matt
Blogs for Bush

Liberals may not take my word for it, but I am not making this up.


<<< The US economy isn't just producing jobs these days, it's also producing good jobs. Alongside the ads for jobs handling a cash register or a spatula are these new opportunities: In St. Louis, AFB International is enlisting both technicians, paid $30,000 to $40,000, and PhD scientists, offered $80,000 to $100,000, in its quest for the perfect pet food. In Delaware, Honeywell plans to hire people at $40,000 to $100,000 to work in a data-storage center. In southern California, some of the latest openings involve working on the railroad, for $35,000 to $70,000 a year. Union Pacific plans to add 2,000 employees altogether. >>>


I know liberals will have their negative spin on this news... but, it's really just denial.

blogsforbush.com

csmonitor.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)4/27/2006 2:46:00 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Consumer Confidence Climbs Yet Again

By Katie MacGuidwin
GOP.com Blog

USA Today reports “Consumer confidence hit a four-year high in April, while existing home sales rose unexpectedly in March… the New York-based Conference Board's consumer confidence index rose to 109.6 in April from 107.5 in March, the highest since May 2002.”

gop.com

usatoday.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)4/28/2006 1:40:56 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

It’s the Stupidity, Economy

-- Jayson
PoliPundit.com

Beige Book

The Federal Reserve says very recent economic activity has been solid:

<<< Reports from all twelve Federal Reserve Districts indicate that economic activity continued to expand in March and the first half of April. >>>


I’m sure Lou Dobbs, Paul Krugman, Howard Dean and Gloria Borger vehemently will disagree with that assessment – as they’re riding around in their limosuines.

* * *

Consumers

Ironically enough, mainstream American consumers continue to defy the liberal media and to defy acid-dropping professors at Berkeley by going ahead and perceiving the economy to be just fine, thank you:

<<< “Consumer Confidence Index Improves Further in April

The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index, which had increased in March, improved further in April. The Index now stands at 109.6, up from 107.5 in March. This is the highest level since May 2002. >>>

Jobless Claims

The Labor Department says the four-week moving average of first-time claims for state jobless benefits is that of 309,000.

To put that into perspective, back in April 1998 – during the halcyon daze of the liberal media’s self-proclaimed “greatest economic expansion of all time” – the four-week moving average of initial jobless claims was 311,000.

Yep, more people were being laid off from their jobs back then when compared to today. That’s notwithstanding the fact upwards of 13 million more people are working today.

Go figure.

polipundit.com

federalreserve.gov

conference-board.org



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)5/4/2006 2:59:29 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

More Great Economic News

By Kim Priestap on Economics

More great news on the economy.

<<< NEW YORK, May 3 (Reuters) - Activity in both the vast US services sector and at factories accelerated more than expected, according to data that pointed to fresh economic vigour and the risk of more interest rate hikes.

Most economists are expecting economic growth to slow from a torrid first-quarter pace of 4.8 per cent, yet the latest figures showed no hints of slowing and appeared likely to keep the Federal Reserve leaning toward further rate rises. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said last week a pause in the rate-hike cycle was possible.

The Institute for Supply Management's services index rose to 63.0 in April from 60.5 in March, with new orders hitting a two-year high, confounding Wall Street estimates for a slowdown to 59.2.

In addition, the government reported new factory orders rose a stronger-than-expected 4.2 per cent in March, beating estimates for a 3.5 per cent gain, as demand for transportation equipment, computers and electronics proved robust.

Treasury debt prices fell and the dollar firmed against the euro after the data.

"It does suggest that the overall economy is improving and for the market it is part of the recent theme - all the numbers are coming in on the stronger side of expectations," said Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James & Associates in St Petersburg, Florida. >>>

Usually high oil and gas prices really hurt the economy, but ours keeps going strong. Just imagine how hot the economy would be if If oil prices were around $40 a barrel instead of hovering around $70. Actually, I read that they have dropped below $70 a barrel.

Watch for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to come out with another threat against Israel and the US. At some point, I would think that oil speculators would become bored with Ahmadinejad's games and begin to ignore him.

feeds.wizbangblog.com

today.reuters.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)5/26/2006 4:20:09 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Booming Economy

Media Blog
Stephen Spruiell Reporting

How many quarters like this does it take before Bush finally catches a break?


<<< The U.S. economy shot forward at an upwardly revised 5.3 percent annual rate in the first quarter, the fastest growth in 2-1/2 years, as companies built up inventories and exports strengthened, a Commerce Department report on Thursday showed.

First-quarter growth in gross domestic product was more than triple the 1.7 percent annual rate recorded in last year's fourth quarter, though still slightly below Wall Street economists' forecasts for a 5.7 percent pace.

Prices remained in check, with the core personal consumption expenditures price index that the Federal Reserve favors rising at a 2 percent rate compared with 2.4 percent in the fourth quarter. >>>

David Leonhardt, writing in the New York Times, expands on this:

<<< More to the point, some other improvements have accelerated recently. In just the last 15 years, the murder rate has been cut almost in half. Many big cities are far more vibrant places than they used to be. About 33 percent of young adults get a bachelor's degree these days, up from 25 percent in the early 1990's. The gap between men's and women's pay reached its lowest ever last year. The divorce rate has stopped rising.

Many luxuries of earlier generations — owning a three-bedroom house, flying across the country, calling relatives who live overseas — are staples of middle-class life. If all this doesn't add up to a rise in living standards, I'm not sure what the phrase means. >>>


He then explains that instead of talking negative about the economy, Democrats should follow the example of Barack Obama, who focuses more on the insecurity that has accompanied recent prosperity. When newspapers go from harping on gas prices and wages to coaching the Democrats to use the booming economy to their advantage, hey — that's progress!

media.nationalreview.com

nrd.nationalreview.com

nytimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)6/2/2006 5:16:54 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Unemployment Hits 4.6%, Press Announce "Cooling Economy"

Media Blog
Stephen Spruiell Reporting

This is madness:


<<< The American economy added a surprisingly weak number of jobs in May, a sign that nervousness over a cooling economy may be spreading among the nation's employers.

The net increase in nonfarm payrolls in May — 75,000 — is a significant falloff from April, when the Labor Department estimates that 126,000 jobs were added, a figure it revised downward today from the 138,000 it initially reported.

Anything below about 150,000 net new jobs a month is regarded as too slow to keep up with population growth, so in effect, workers are losing ground.

Using figures from a different statistical survey, the Labor Department reported today that the unemployment rate edged slightly lower in May to 4.6 percent, from 4.7 percent in April. Only people who are actively seeking work are counted, not those who have given up trying, so it is not unusual for the rate to fall in months of weak job growth. While by some measures the economy roared along during the first three months of the year, many economists expect it to slow in the second half. Few expect a recession, but there is little agreement over just how much it will cool off. >>>


So just to recap: Unemployment falls. GDP races ahead by 5.3 percent ("some measures") — the fastest growth in 2 1/2 years. Yet the New York Times surveys this landscape and declares, "The sky is falling! Look out!"

The Washington Post's report on the job numbers also leads with the falloff in job creation, but it is a little less alarmist about the future of the economy:


<<< "Clearly, when the April figures came out, it was easy enough to say 'It's only one' and indeed we anticipated a snapback in May. We were clearly wrong about that," [Stephen] Stanley [of RBS Greenwich Capital] wrote. ". . . . Now that there are two consecutive bad results, it is more difficult to write it off. That being said, there is very little corresponding evidence that labor demand has weakened by nearly as much as these data suggest, so we are skeptical but respectful." >>>


The AP's account is more balanced, but still pessimistic:


<<< Job growth faltered in May, with employers boosting payrolls by just 75,000. Yet the nation's unemployment rate dipped to 4.6 percent, the lowest since the summer of 2001.

The latest snapshot, released by the Labor Department on Friday, offered a mixed picture of the jobs climate. Wage growth, meanwhile, slowed, a development that should ease concerns about inflation getting out of hand. [...]

The payrolls figure and the unemployment rate come from two different economic surveys, which can sometimes provide - as in Friday's case - a conflicting picture of what is happening in the labor market. >>>


It is likely that the economy will not repeat last quarter's astonishing growth — how long can 5.3 percent expansion be sustained? But looking at the press coverage of today's jobs report, one would be forgiven for thinking that by August, the most difficult decision facing average Americans will be whether to eat Whiskas and Friskies. We're at near-full employment. Is this a problem of unrealistic expectations, or is there some other agenda driving this relentlessly downbeat coverage?

All relevant links here
media.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)6/9/2006 3:45:43 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Jobless Claims Plunge Farther Than Expected

By Katie MacGuidwin
GOP.com Blog

Reuters reports this morning “The number of U.S. workers claiming an initial week of jobless aid tumbled by 35,000 last week, far more than expected, to the lowest level in two months, a government report showed on Thursday. First-time claims for state unemployment insurance benefits fell to a seasonally adjusted 302,000 in the week ended June 3, from an upwardly revised 337,000 claims in the previous week, the Labor Department said.”

gop.com

today.reuters.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)6/26/2006 5:45:00 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

U.S. Standard of Living

By Texas Rainmaker on Economy

<<< "Americans enjoying highest standard of living in history, study finds."

American families have never earned more income, spent less on necessities or enjoyed a higher standard of living than they do right now. >>>

I blame Bush.

texasrainmaker.com

kansascity.com



To: Sully- who wrote (11064)6/29/2006 5:08:59 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (50) | Respond to of 35834
 
Hooverville

Bush Economy Continues To Impress

By Captain Ed on National Politics
Captain's Quarters

Although the national media has not covered it in any depth whatsoever, the Bush economy has turned into one of the strongest booms in the last several years. Despite predictions that it had run its course, the opening quarter of this year shows that we continue to expand at a phenomenal rate of 5.6%:


<<< The economy sprang out of a year-end rut and zipped ahead in the opening quarter of this year at a 5.6 percent pace, the fastest in 2 1/2 years and even stronger than previously thought.

The new snapshot of gross domestic product for the January-to-March period exceeded the 5.3 percent growth rate estimated a month ago, the Commerce Department reported Thursday. The upgraded reading — based on more complete information — matched economists' forecasts.

The stronger GDP figure mostly reflected an improvement in the country's trade deficit, which was much less of a drag than previously estimated. >>>


The economy does not get much press in a Republican administration unless the news is bad.
That isn't just the fault of the media, but also of the people who run communications at the Treasury and the White House. One of the reasons that John Snow had been rumored to be on his way out for so long was the lack of attention given to the four years of economic expansion under George Bush. Apparently, this trend still continues.

One might expect that a better-than-expected trade deficit might get some attention, especially considering the controversies drummed up by political opponents over outsourcing. Again, the improvement will probably escape the notice of the media, due to the lack of bad news.

Cheer up. though, because analysts believe the Q2 figure will drop to around 3%. We can then expect headlines screaming that growth fell by almost half between the two quarters, with plenty of doomsayers to explain why the Bush tax policies are to blame. At that point, they will have to report that Q1 showed such excellent economic strength and hope that viewers and readers can't connect the dots.

captainsquartersblog.com

news.yahoo.com