Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (64569)	6/3/2005 9:52:04 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

<not on HOV, but soon, soon, at the psychological moment, with blue-pill enhanced gusto ;0)> Hmm, more quantum weirdness. I am inclined to agree and have made some initial chess moves to establish just such a position, though as yet am cautiously surveying the situation and have not popped a blue pill. Please revert to your normal disagreeing status as it is confusing to see you agree. Perhaps an opinion on QCOM would set us straight again. I note in passing that QCOM has got another $1 billion to spend on buying shares and they have recently spent over $1 billion at about $35 a share, together with selling swarms of put options. They apparently think that $35 is better than keeping money. Which is odd since a couple of years ago they thought that $18 was too much [split-adjusted] and I don't think they doubled the value of their cash position in two years. I wish they'd paid me dividends instead of buying shares at $35! Mqurice