Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (44623)	6/5/2005 6:32:58 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206363

Its hard to believe that the Bush administration would manage to war in Iraq in a way to benefit one company, such as Halliburton, with a no-bid sole-source contract. But do so, they did. And they continue to do so to this very day. Given this example, why should it be difficult to imagine that the motivation behind the attempt, by King George's Privy Council, to steal ChevronTexaco's California offshore oil and gas leases is to benefit another company in the future? In this case, likely ExxonMobil. The attempted theft is shocking enough by itself, regardless of the motivation. We are witnessing a return to the age of King George and the corrupt Privy Council of PM William Pitt, the Younger (later known as the Earl of Chatham). .