SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (163731)6/6/2005 3:11:22 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
THE RUSSERT WATCH: OUR READERS ASK THE QUESTIONS TIM RUSSERT DIDN'T

June 06, 2005
Arianna Huffington
huffingtonpost.com

THE RUSSERT WATCH: OUR READERS ASK THE QUESTIONS TIM RUSSERT DIDN'T

On Friday we asked you to send us the questions you’d like to hear Tim Russert ask RNC chairman Ken Mehlman, his guest on this week’s Meet the Press. We got dozens of great responses. The best one wasn’t actually a question, but a spot-on observation: “It really doesn't matter what question you ask if you don't ask a series of follow-up questions and prevent the interviewee from filibustering. ... If Russert were to do this no one would come on his show anymore."

Here are the top ten questions we got… none of which -- surprise, surprise! -- Russert asked Mehlman:

1. Roger Matile: Given the problems the military is having with recruiting, have you encouraged your son to volunteer for the U.S. Army?

2. Theresa Clare: With all the evidence and allegations regarding the way the U.S. has treated prisoners -- both kidnapping people and taking them to other countries to be interrogated, and also the treatment in U.S.-run prison camps -- don't you think it's the responsibility of the Republican congressional leadership, and even the President's responsibility, to convene an independent inquiry into these issues?

3. Rebmarks: Traditionally, the Republican Party was the party of fiscal restraint. What happened to that? How is it that this Republican administration and Congress seem to think that it is perfectly okay to saddle our children with our bills because we keep charging everything and refuse to ante up what it takes to pay for them?

4. Christine Moore: President Bush claims that he opposes destroying life to save life when explaining his reasons for opposing stem cell research. At the same time, he justifies the war in Iraq by saying that lives are being saved, though tens of thousands of innocent civilians have been killed in the process, thus "destroying life to save life." Would you kindly explain the contradiction?

5. cynicalgirl: Ken, why hasn't the White House responded to requests by Rep Louise Slaughter and Rep John Conyers regarding the unusual access given to the White House to Jeff Gannon/James Guckert?

6. Don P: In refusing to comply with the Senate's requests for the NSA intercepts requested in the Bolton nomination, and in using Dick Cheney to change the rules of the Senate on a simple majority, isn't the administration destroying the constitutional requirement for checks and balances?

7. Ryan1: Does Bush have a plan to deal with skyrocketing health care costs? Secondly, fuel costs are going up, and experts say they may never come down. This administration seems to be committed to fossil fuels, and offers only token gestures when it comes to developing alternative energy sources. What are the administration's plans to deal with this problem?

8. Fred R.: Ken, can you shed any light into the connection between Grover Norquist, President Bush, and Bush "Pioneer" Jack Abramoff?

9. Richard: Electronic voting boxes can be manipulated, so why use them?

10. Buzzramjet: Do you think a special prosecutor's office should be set up to investigate the Downing Street Memo? Or the charges at GITMO? Or where all the money that Halliburton refuses to account for went? Or voting irregularities around the country?



To: bentway who wrote (163731)6/6/2005 3:49:47 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Grounding a Pandemic
_________________________________

Editorial
The New York Times
By BARACK OBAMA and RICHARD LUGAR
June 6, 2005
nytimes.com

Washington — When we think of the major threats to our national security, the first to come to mind are nuclear proliferation, rogue states and global terrorism. But another kind of threat lurks beyond our shores, one from nature, not humans - an avian flu pandemic. An outbreak could cause millions of deaths, destabilize Southeast Asia (its likely place of origin), and threaten the security of governments around the world.

Earlier this year, Dr. Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, called the possibility of avian flu spreading from Southeast Asia "a very ominous situation for the globe." A killer flu could spread around the world in days, crippling economies in Southeast Asia and elsewhere. From a public health standpoint, Dr. Gerberding said, an avian flu outbreak is "the most important threat that we are facing right now."

International health experts say that two of the three conditions for an avian flu pandemic in Southeast Asia have already been met. First, a new strain of the virus, called A(H5N1), has emerged, and humans have little or no immunity to it. Second, this strain can jump between species. The only remaining obstacle is that A(H5N1) has not yet mutated into a form that is easily transmitted from human to human.

However, there have been some alarming developments. In recent months, the virus has been detected in mammals that have never previously been infected, including tigers, leopards and domestic cats. This spread suggests that the virus is mutating and could eventually emerge in a form that is readily transmittable among humans, leading to a full-blown pandemic. In fact, according to government officials, a few cases of human-to-human spread of A(H5N1) have already occurred.

The precedent that experts fear is the 1918 flu pandemic, which began in the American Midwest and swept the planet in the era before air travel, killing 20 million to 40 million people. As John M. Barry, author of "The Great Influenza," has observed, "Influenza killed more people in a year than the Black Death of the Middle Ages killed in a century; it killed more people in 24 weeks than AIDS has killed in 24 years."

At the moment, effective responses to an avian flu pandemic are limited and will come far too late for many people in Southeast Asia. Indeed, so far more than 60 percent of those diagnosed with the avian flu have died. There is no proven vaccine for the A(H5N1) strain and it could take months to produce a fully effective one. Moreover, while some antiviral treatments may help flu sufferers, they are not widely available and must be administered to patients within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms.

It is essential for the international community, led by the United States, to take decisive action to prevent a pandemic.

So what should we do? Recently, the World Health Organization called for more money and attention to be devoted to effective preventive action, appealing for $100 million.

Congress responded promptly. A bipartisan group of senators obtained $25 million for prevention efforts (a quarter of the request, the traditional contribution of the United States), allowing the C.D.C., the Agency for International Development, the Health and Human Services Department and other agencies to improve their ability to act.

In addition, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously approved legislation directing President Bush to form a senior-level task force to put in place an international strategy to deal with the avian flu and coordinate policy among our government agencies. We urge the Bush administration to form this task force immediately without waiting for legislation to be passed.

But these are only modest first steps. International health experts believe that Southeast Asia will be an epicenter of influenza for decades. We recommend that this administration work with Congress, public health officials, the pharmaceutical industry, foreign governments and international organizations to create a permanent framework for curtailing the spread of future infectious diseases.

Among the parts of that framework could be these:

Increasing international disease surveillance, response capacity and public education and coordination, especially in Southeast Asia.

Stockpiling enough antiviral doses to cover high-risk populations and essential workers.

Ensuring that, here at home, Health and Human Services and state governments put in place plans that address issues of surveillance, medical care, drug and vaccine distribution, communication, protection of the work force and maintenance of core public functions in case of a pandemic.

Accelerating research into avian flu vaccines and antiviral drugs.

Establishing incentives to encourage nations to report flu outbreaks quickly and fully.

So far, A(H5N1) has not been found in the United States. But in an age when you can board planes in Bangkok or Hong Kong and arrive in Chicago, Indianapolis or New York in hours, we must face the reality that these exotic killer diseases are not isolated health problems half a world away, but direct and immediate threats to security and prosperity here at home.
______________________________

Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana, is its chairman.