Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (8412)	6/7/2005 10:27:01 AM
From: Done, gone.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

Not until King Arthur chops off Black Knight's head. Maybe not even then. (g)

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (8412)	6/7/2005 3:19:35 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12465

I liked the Black Knight reference. You might remember that even when he lost both arms and both legs he could not be silenced ;-). I don't "hope" I have options in the U.S., I have them, granted me by the United States Constitution and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. First among those options is an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Some of you may remember my former counsel advising me that to appeal the arbitration orders of the San Francisco Superior Court would lead to sanctions. I ignored that advice and filed writ petitions, less than 5% of which are granted. Consequently, the Court of Appeals cited the presiding judge of the Superior Court for abuse of discretion, and reversed his orders via two writs of mandamus. So, I have done it before. Berber and Moor might consider their popping the champagne corks mighty premature, especially when they review the United States Supreme Court decisions in Reves and Salinas, which controlling law no federal judge has discretion to ignore. Also, though not posted here at SI, they might also want to consider the Court's opinion that certain of my amended complaint text failed to adequately plead RICO claims. That was a remarkable opinion, considering that I took that text DIRECT from the United States Department of Justice's RICO complaint filed against the tobacco companies, which text those defendants knew better than to even attempt to call into question. Not my text, but DOJ's. I prepared. Now I am simply amazed that the Court has on the one hand declared me a vexatious litigant, and on the other, is allowing my claims against Rea and Trading Places to proceed to trial in his Court! If I am vexatious for continuing to legally pursue Berber, then by definition I would be for suing Rea and TP, because they have all been named, together in each action, from the very beginning. The fat lady hasn't even entered the building yet.