SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (118635)6/7/2005 12:12:30 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793900
 
The people she works with seem to think highly of her.

I have no way to evaluate her and have no opinion on her confirmation. I was just interested in the point about judicial activism. Whether she is a judicial activist, I don't know. I have in mind the situational principles of her backers and opponents. I've found it interesting to watch those who claimed allegiance to the principle of states rights abandon that when it became inconvenient and I'm now finding it interesting to watch the same thing happen with the principle of judicial activism.

I really hate when that happens. <g>



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (118635)6/9/2005 9:55:29 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793900
 
She violated one of the two no nos for the dems--she spoke out against race preferences, the other being the abortion issue of course. And the fact that she is black is more eggregious in their view so she gets the clarence thomas, ward connerly treatement while at the same jesse jackson runs around california in support of michael jackson probably crying racism.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News