Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Playing the QQQQ with Terry and friends. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gush who wrote (706)	6/7/2005 7:57:41 PM
From: J.K.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4814

Shiver me timbers, say it ain't so! I don't know: The 5,3,3 is a fast setting and a mild pause in this decline would pull back those signal lines a fair amount. I think the 14,3,3, is the way to go here: stockcharts.com[h,a]daclyyay[dc][pb100!b20!f][vc60][iUp14,3,3!Up5,3,3]&pref=G I'll let you lead the charge on that move you courageous fool -g-.

To: Gush who wrote (706)	6/8/2005 8:20:13 AM
From: Walkingshadow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4814

Hi Gush, 90 min before the open now, and the futures indicate a moderate gap up at the open. The reason (ostensibly) is upside forward guidance by TXN, for which TXN was rewarded with a downgrade by JMP Securities), an upgrade of CAT by Prudential, and a favorable DOJ ruling for MO. So I can't figure out from this if the futures are rallying because of an upgrade or a downgrade. Or maybe they just got inspired by the interesting combination of raising guidance and getting a downgrade. Then again, maybe it's because Greenspan is still asleep and hasn't said anything at all yet today. Wonder what he'll have for breakfast? If it is something oily, will traders buy stocks figuring that this means he is okay with higher oil prices? T