SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (20276)6/9/2005 1:14:03 AM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
The question of twins is an interesting and challenging one. I don't know but I assumed that you are not a twin. If not then my statement that "You are a genetically unique individual Human Being, and have been from the moment your parents DNA mixed together at your conception." would not even be in question, it is a fact. But lets say for arguments sake that you were. This might bring up some interesting questions about identity between the two twins but there still is no question that the twins both before and after division are 1.Human 2.Alive and 3.Genetically distinct from
the mother carrying them.

"scientists are not agreed on many aspects of twinning. Some claim that twinning may be a nonsexual form of parthenogenesis or "parenting." This occurs in some animals and plants. Others claim that when twinning occurs, an existing human being dies and gives life to two new and identical human beings like himself or herself. Still others claim that since not all human concepti have the capacity to twin, one could argue that there exists in some concepti a basic duality prior to the split. Hence, it may be claimed that at least in some incipient form two individual lives were present from the start at conception. In any event, the fact of twinning does not seem to be a sufficient reason to give up the belief that full humanness begins at conception. (Francis Beckwith)

I don't see how twinning makes that much difference to the abortion issue since it still involves killing another Human life of lives as the case may be.

<<No other person has the right to end your existence by killing you.>>

"What is existence without conscience? There is no way you are going to convince me that a blastoid is aware."

I don't recall trying to convince you that they are. I have only said they are distinct Human Persons who have a right to life, that's every bit as valid as yours and mine. What you really seem to be doing is making a value judgement about life without conscious awareness. You have the right to your opinion on that, but you still don't have the right to kill someone else who happens to be unconscious.

"It's easy to get from your position to the position that no life can be taken, including brocolli and green algae, and then where are you going to find your dinner? The farther your position gets from reality the more absurd it's conclusions are."

You haven't shown that at all. To say that because I oppose the unwarranted taking of innocent Human lives through unnecessary abortions means I can't eat vegetables just does not follow logically.