Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (236390)	6/8/2005 4:49:54 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573143

Ten, the Holocaust cameras were not up running in real time either, OK? Actually there are no photos or let alone live shots from inside operating KZ camps as far as I know while the technology for sure was available at the time. The cameras up running there were only put into operation by and after the victorious Allies moved in. Taro

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (236390)	6/8/2005 5:35:23 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573143

Fellow member of the "Zionist conspiracy," let's just say that both the crucifixion of Christ and the Holocaust of WWII are verifiable historic events.<?I> You did see where I said secular evidence.......that means a video clip, maybe one or two photos or even an entry in a book of public record. Of course, cameras haven't been invented in Jesus' time, so I think the Holocaust has a slight advantage in terms of physical evidence ... Without the camera and the typewriter, the Holocaust still has a huge advantage. Given the amount of official records on the crucifixion, you would think it was held in the middle of a deserted island in the middle of the night. ted