SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (119233)6/10/2005 11:24:05 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793933
 
It appears a majority of his extended family buys into the Indian relative deal.

It also appears that he made a valiant effort to tie it down by getting credentialed by one of the tribes. With no success. And he is the only family member to try to profit by it.

Where they really have him is on the plagarism.



To: Oral Roberts who wrote (119233)6/10/2005 3:39:54 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793933
 
Anyone who is a responsible genealogist, either amateur or professional, NEVER states something is as a "FOR SURE" unless there is documented evidence in several places. Rather, if it is an "I think", the information is stated as an "I think, or I believe, but it is not yet proven".....

Churchill has been very open about his statements. I haven't read a single "I think" in anything I've read when he was mentioned his "so called Indian ancestry."


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News