Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (105848)	6/10/2005 10:23:52 AM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

The Dems are out of control. They need to continue to be held in check and not being elected until they realize the American Public think them and their behaviour is unacceptable. That is not a fundamentalist view, it is a normal American view of their party.

To: redfish who wrote (105848)	6/10/2005 10:25:46 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

As ionesco points out, it's a matter of choices. Many people vote against a candidate rather than for one. So if Pat Robertson were running against crazy Howard Dean, many people would vote for Robertson even if they weren't part of his inbred following. I certainly would.

To: redfish who wrote (105848)	6/10/2005 11:24:50 AM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 108807

The reason the dem party is having problems is they are too focused on whether people like them as opposed to sticking to their principles. That assumes that they have principles. The problem with the dem party as I see it is that they don't have principles, they have interest groups. As I see the parties, the Libertarian party is the only one that truly has principles that at least some of their candidates try to stick to. Not all, by any means, but at least some. But in that they do better than either the Repulicrats or the Democans.