SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pyslent who wrote (1494)6/10/2005 7:32:49 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
iTUNES Competition: Rhapsody and the Subscription Model

pyslent,

<< Listen Rhapsody is an entirely different animal than iTunes Music Store... >>

It's more versatile but other than that I personally don't consider Rhapsody to be a different animal at all. It is certainly a recently improved animal -- much improved, and the improvements go far beyond the new subscription services. I consider it to be simply a more mature and versatile music store animal than what has been available till recently from Real or Apple others, and as you note:

... you can still pay-per download with these services just as you would with iTunes

By layering several variations of a subscription based model on top of an excellent free non-subscription basic service (Rhapsody 25) with its underlying purchase model, Real has kicked the game up a notch beyond iTUNES offer, and Microsoft will be doing the same thing, and there are of course Napster and Yahoo and Sprint variants on the subscription model.

In the case of Listen Rhapsody I immediately found that the Radio (and its integration with the capability to purchase) is a powerful adder (and lure) to the free or subscription service because any song played on a station links directly to the album it's from and its tracks (with a sidebar of other similar albums) and they can be easily purchased for 99¢ (89¢ for subscribers) while channel surfing or listening. This capability is worked out considerably better by Real than it is in MusicMatch Jukebox Plus 10 (MMJ+) or iTUNES. As a result, although it wasn't my intention, last evening I wound up purchasing ½ dozen tracks and one album while familiarizing myself with the content of several of the free radio stations. My wife walked into my office (attached to my home) to tell me to crank the volume and when I showed her what I was doing I had to purchase a few more tracks of her choice. I purchased a few more this morning as a byproduct of having the Cool Jazz station playing in the background.

I'm not a Rhapsody subscriber and I never will be (although I might flip for the full blown Radio subscription). I don't fit the subscriber model and the model doesn't fit me, and it won't fit a lot of people. Different strokes for different folks. I am, however, a new and very satisfied registered user of Real's free service and the account I established with them includes a capability to purchase and download and use their Player as a complement to MJ+10 which I use primarily to manage a large music collection that started life on vinyl and CD - with the original CD media and ripped and burned mixes now stored in (5) 200-disc carousels on 3 systems in my home and in zippered books in the pockets of my vehicles, and as a complement to Microsoft's WMP 10, the de facto industry standard media player.

Where I used to purchase tracks from the Musicmatch store in the future I'll be purchasing most of them from Real. I buy a fraction of the number of CDs I bought in the years 1988 to 2003 from Time-Life (collections of all genre) or Amazon (and before that CD Now), although music oriented DVD purchases from Amazon are up even though I often record concerts myself from cable and rip and burn to DVD/CD and/or move to my music server. As a collector I still prefer to maintain hard copy even though storage is an issue although less so than with VHS tape. I have about 1,000 classic movies on VHS tape and someday I'll get around to transferring those to DVD and on to the server. I went through that already with vinyl to CD and HDD. My audiophile son-in-law now owns all of my collector LPs on red and white virgin vinyl along with some of the good black stuff. The rest has been donated to Salvation Army.

<< My feeling has always been that the appeal of such subscription services will not ultimately be realized until 3G services proliferate and provide for the ability to access streamed music on demand over the air. This circumvents completely the need to transfer digital music from your PC to your phone and gives you access to any song anytime-- a true celestial jukebox. >>

I tend to agree with you on that. Engadget recently had a fairly good commentary on Napster To Go's (and other) subscription models and it uses your term “celestial jukebox” (slightly differently) and has an interesting comment about an object models v. experience models:

tinyurl.com

The subscription music model isn't going to be for everybody. If you absolutely must own every single piece of music you ever listen to, then Napster To Go is not for you. Likewise, if you only care to hear music you already know about and like, you're better off elsewhere. But the NTG model is extremely attractive to folks like early adopters and heavy music fans, who have an insatiable need to be exposed to new artists. It will also be of use to anyone seeking to broaden their musical tastes by getting relatively inexpensive access to entirely new genres and artists. All of which can live happily side by side with the pay-per download model. Sometimes you want the buffet, and other times you just know what you want. It’s all good. Thinking of the Napster To Go model as “renting music” is short-sighted. What you're really paying for is the complete service of being able to centrally store and organize your music collection online, where it is accessible from anywhere you can access a Windows PC, as well as all of the embedded features available to help you find new music in a way that’s personalized to your tastes. Some people prefer to maintain their own digital music collection entirely locally, but there’s enough of a time and materials cost in that process such that there will be plenty of folks who will gladly pay someone else $15 a month to host and manage not only their current collection, but their future collection as they access it through the service — as well as the management layer on top of the whole works. Store your collection locally and it’s only available locally (though a crop of services such as Orb Networks aims to change that). If your collection lives on Napster’s servers, it’s more easily available to you wherever you are. The Napster To Go service fills the gap by porting your collection to your portable device, obviating the need to be near a PC for access. If Napster were smart, they'd already be trying to get in on the musicphone action as we speak, to create the truly seamless “celestial jukebox” experience as envisioned. Music is moving away from being based in a physical medium that itself must be owned. Music no longer need be seen as an object, when it can more accurately be described as an experience. The iTunes pay-per-download model is still an object model. The Napster To Go model is an experience model, and some people are really going to dig that.

Thanks for entering into the discussion here. You and others that are more familiar with iPOD than I am have provided some very good inputs.

Best,

- Eric -



To: pyslent who wrote (1494)6/14/2005 7:29:09 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2955
 
MP3 Music: The Subscription Model

psylent,

A few days back you stated ...

My feeling has always been that the appeal of such subscription services will not ultimately be realized until 3G services proliferate and provide for the ability to access streamed music on demand over the air.

I was in general agreement and I emphatically told you the subscription model wasn't for me and wouldn't be for me. [My worm has turned]

You also stated:

I personally loved Real Rhapsody when I was a subscriber for 6 months or so last year. As a means for music discovery, it's ability to generate personalized radio stations (customized by one's musical tastes) and then allow one to cross-reference whatever it's playing (jump to the artist's catalog) blows the doors off of anything that iTunes can offer.

I now need to eat my own words of a few days back and since you previously subscribed Real Rhapsody (before I did) you may be able to appreciate these comments more than some others.

I started two weeks back with the freebie Rhapsody 25 service, upgraded after a few days to the $40/annum Radio subscription on a 14 day trial, and after determining that the 3.0 client was very stable on my cleaned up XP Pro platform I just superseded that with the $99/annum Rhapsody Unlimited service (a $60 adder to my short-lived Radio sub). Actually I took the quarterly billing (commitment) option so I'm paying $108 per year for the service but I didn't bother with the 14 day trial this time around. This is an infectious and well thought out service with well thought out merchandising pull inside.

In between all this I upgraded my PC speaker kit, the better to enjoy this service and may upgrade it again shortly.

Rather obviously, if I was an MP3 player user with an iPOD or playforsure device ... and may well be, before long, I'd probably opt for the Rhapsody To Go option which allows a subscriber to load and reload an MP3 player with fresh music from Rhapsody's 1 million plus tracks catalog at anytime for no additional charge over and above the $15/mo charge for the service which includes all the functionality of Rhapsody Radio and Rhapsody Unlimited.

Real is for Real. The subscription model is for real. It is just going to take time for folks to learn about the model, appreciate the model, adjust to it, submit their payment authorization, sit back and enjoy. Essentially I just went through the process. I won't be the last to do this.

I said earlier I'd be listening to Apple's upcoming earnings CC for the 1st time. I'll also be listening to Real's for the 1st time.

The games afoot.

Best,

- Eric -