SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: trouthead who wrote (62815)6/10/2005 11:54:44 AM
From: sea_biscuitRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Even those who got the hundred bucks tax cuts, lost all of it and more in the form of increased property taxes, sales taxes, state taxes, local taxes and so on. Not to mention the reduction in services (transportation, daycare, medical services etc.) at the local, state and federal levels.

It was a tax cut only for the rich. For the poor, it was large cuts in services.



To: trouthead who wrote (62815)6/10/2005 11:58:58 AM
From: tontoRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
If one only pays $500 in taxes, of course their savings will not equal that of one that was paying $500,000. But they have already been subsidized...which must not be forgotten.

There were reductions across the board.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News