Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (236821)	6/11/2005 1:53:30 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571175

With the missing Soviet "suitcase" nukes (actually takes two people to carry the parts), all North Korea needs is new batteries. I assume they have the technology to accomplish that... But I'd be more worried about biological dispersed at LAX...

To: combjelly who wrote (236821)	6/15/2005 7:01:00 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1571175

"I think the odds of the nuke getting through are much higher than 1 in 50." Based on what? Assuming that the US is still cooperating with international agencies, acquiring a nuke from, say NK or Russia and shipping it to the US and placing it is going to make all kinds of ripples in the international scene. The organization required is far more than even Al Quaida is capable of. My statement was based on the assumption that Al Quaida or someone like them or inspired by them has the nuke already. I was talking about the dificulty involved in transportation which really isn't all that great. Not a peice of cake, but not incredibly daunting either. Getting the nuke would be much harder. The idea of NK doing it is a total non-starter. I mostly agree. I might not call it a "total non-starter", but it isn't very far away from being one. My analysis was based on the assumption that someone with the nuke wanted to make the attack. In that case it would be a huge danger. If you don't assume that and consider the relative lack of motivation of those who currently have nukes, and the lack of nukes in the hands of those who have the motivation, you get a result that a nuke attack on the US is not likely any time soon. Of course considering how destructive such an attack can be even a very small risk is one that we should take reasonable measures to deal with. Tim