Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (119756)	6/13/2005 8:22:16 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793897

t appears to me that you agree with my view I do agree with your view. I disagreed with what UW said. As long as you're not conflating risk to the Constitution with risk to our way of life, we are in agreement. Otherwise we're not. That is not parsing of words. They are different concepts and different entities. For example, you car may derive from the minds and factories of Ford. If your car is endangered by a runaway semi on the freeway, the risk is to your car, not to Ford. Likewise, the risk from terrorists is loss of life and property and to our sense of security. Terrorists can't harm our Constitution.