Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (64998)	6/14/2005 8:45:47 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

Re: In my view, that apparent puff going off on a lower floor not yet part of the collapsing structure could come from massive stresses (i.e a wave of stress) That was my immediate reaction as well when I first discovered the demolition squibs in a KTLA-TV video of the North Tower collapse. I just could not believe that the squibs were a result of controlled demolition and ascribed them to compressed air coming out of a vent port or some such explanation.... Then I saw the photos and videos of entire floors several floors removed from and below where they could possibly be being impacted by the debris above (intervening floors remained intact) and realized that I was, indeed, viewing visual evidence of controlled demolitions. It is understandably a leap of faith to disbelieve the U.S. government, the Kean-Zelikow report and the entire U.S. corporate media. However, with enough study, I've come to realize the real horror of 9/11. It was unquestionably a false flag operation, with all that that implies. * Let's start with a common sense question, shall we? How could a building in Madrid, Spain recently burn with shocking intensity for about 48 hours and not collapse, and yet WTC 2, with a smoldering fire that appeared to be going out collapse within an hour? rense.com Clear evidence of a demolition squib: 911research.wtc7.net North Tower, showing an anomalous pattern of ejecta above the impact zone: rense.com North Tower, about 3/4 down this page, you can link to the KTLA-TV video showing two demolition squibs occurring in sequence several floors below the main destruction: plaguepuppy.net [This was the best early physical evidence I had about the fact that cutting charges were used in the towers.] WTC 7: Halfway through the demolition, explosives streamers clearly show: wtc7.net * Here's a photo of the results of a modern high explosive charge: billcarlisle.tripod.com [There may be a reason that the plumes at the WTC look similar.] * Here's a series of links: globalresearch.ca.myforums.net And this pair of photos shows clearly that the South Tower was brought down by a series of explosions occurring in sequence below the main collapse: thunderbay.indymedia.org * Compare the video of the Southwark Tower (second row, third item) here: implosionworld.com with the collapse of the WTC 7 building. The appearances are shockingly similar. * South Tower Collapse: plaguepuppy.net * Explosive Ejecta: 911research.wtc7.net *** We report, you decide....