SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (161456)6/14/2005 5:10:01 PM
From: brushwudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: 1024 x 768 is not very good, given a 15" screen.

I think it is a very appropriate resolution for that size of the screen.

I think it's a very appropriate resolution for that price of notebook.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (161456)6/14/2005 5:33:32 PM
From: cruzbayRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
I run my eMachines M6809 (15.4") at 1280 x 800, but 1024 x 768 should be OK for my daughter. I presume that it can be set to a higher resolution, but is it less sharp then if it were native, or slower (or both)? Would it be better off at 1280 x 1024, or the native 1024 x 768?



To: Joe NYC who wrote (161456)6/14/2005 6:06:35 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
I don't. I think 15" is large enough for the next bump up. Either 1280 x 1024, or 1280 x 800 in a wide aspect. 1024 x 768 isn't enough pixels for me. I could see 1024 x 768 with a 12" or even 13" monitor, but at 15"?

For example, HP has a 14" PM notebook with 1280 x 768.

Also, a 15.4" PM notebook with 1280 x 800.

Doug


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News