Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (17682)	6/15/2005 10:26:31 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

I honestly believe he will go down as one of the worst US Presidents in history. >> As opposed to "whatever Bush does is bad"? There are things I think the Bush administration is wrong on. Though I consider those issues less important than those it is correct on.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (17682)	6/16/2005 4:13:36 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

No, as opposed to showing a bit of a reaction to the reality, that UK & US forces doubled rate of bombs to Iraq (southern no fly zone especially) in an attempt to get a violent reaction out of Iraq in the months leading up to the invasion. So that they could justify war. Pity Saddam didn't fight back. THIS after you said invasion of Iraq was justified, because Saddam was shooting at US planes, LOL. And your answer to this is: "Hmm, nothing there that bothers me. Looks like the Iraqis are proceeding with trying Saddam. Another good thing". You don't see what the problem is here? Then you are too far gone to hold intelligent conversation. Or, you do see the problem but are intellectually dishonest to the point where you pretend to be stupid? Either case, if you want to resume this conversation, go back & read that article as many times is necessary to UNDERSTAND what it is saying.