SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: manalagi who wrote (361)6/16/2005 2:30:37 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24207
 
Saw another article this morning talkin' 60 bucks. Can't find it now. But I have a thing against buying oil.
In the "End of Suburbia", somebody, ? Simmons, uses the refinery situation as one argument that we are just about there. Said it made no sense to build a multi-million buck refinery for a 1%ROI with a dwindling resource base. Which is why nobody has built any in a while. But, China is building one.

Oil prices rise further amid supply worries
06.16.2005, 01:59 PM

LONDON (AFX) - World oil prices continued to rise, after surging the previous day as official data showed a drop in US crude inventories, sparking supply worries despite OPEC's decision to increase its daily output quota.

In London, Brent North Sea crude oil for delivery in August rose 35 cents to 55.59 usd per barrel. The July contract expired Wednesday at 54.50 usd.

New York's main contract, light sweet crude for delivery in July, rose 53 cents to 56.10 usd a barrel in early deals. The contract surged to an intra-day high of 56.75 usd on Wednesday.

'Attention in the end has focused on the US inventory data because excluding Saudi Arabia, nobody really thinks that the other OPEC members have actually got any capacity to put their output higher,' Seymour Pierce analyst Richard Slape said.

'All they're doing is legitimising the current overproduction.'

Oil prices had jumped briefly to two-month highs on Wednesday after the US Department of Energy (DoE) said crude oil reserves fell 1.8 mln barrels to 339 mln in the week ending June 10.

The data was released a few hours after the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries agreed to raise its production ceiling by 500,000 barrels per day (bpd) on July 1 and said it might repeat the move by September.

However traders reacted little to the move as OPEC's quota increase was largely seen as a symbolic gesture because the cartel was already pumping more oil than its official ceiling of 27.5 mln bpd set before Wednesday's increase.

Despite the DoE reporting a rise in weekly US distillates stockpiles, the market remains worried about a possible heating fuel shortage during the fourth quarter.

'Crude stocks are still about 10 pct higher than they were a year ago, but distillate stockpiles are barely above their mark at this time last year, worrying some dealers who say heating oil stocks may not build adequately before peak-demand winter' in the northern hemisphere, analysts at the Sucden brokerage firm said.
forbes.com



To: manalagi who wrote (361)6/16/2005 3:25:02 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 24207
 
May help, but a sarcastically moral review, me thinks...

How can you profit from peak oil?
There are some people and blogs out there concerned with energy stocks and what investments in the energy sector might look like in the coming future. I'm not particularly up on investment issues, but blogs like New Era Investor are thinking about how issues like peak oil and baby boomer retirees are going to affect stocks, bonds, gold and silver in the near future. Michael McAllister's Energy Stock Blog seems like a more standard day-to-day accounting of how the energy sector is doing, but also reports on peak oil. For example, he also recently discussed Berman of the Houston Geological Survey (see the two posts below), although McAllister has a somewhat more approving view of him than we did.

OK, well, I would expect that analysts covering the energy industry are going to downplay the types of concerns that we raise here, but at least people like McAllister are taking the issues seriously.

But imagine my horror at seeing this google text ad come up on the side of my gmail account:

World Oil Production Peak
How can you potentially profit? Free report from GA Funds.
www.gafunds.com

Guinness Atkinson Funds is estimating the global peak oil production year will occur between 2015 and 2020 (see chart at right). We suspect that soon, daily oil demand will outstrip daily oil production capacity, potentially creating an opportunity to profit from the ownership and exploitation of the world's dwindling hydrocarbon reserves.

Truly, America at its very finest. As civilization is slowly disintegrating, you too can profit! Of course there's always going to be investing in energy (read: petroleum) even when we're seriously conserving and developing alternative technologies, but to actually advertise your fund by telling potential investors they can capitalize on peak oil? That's pretty shameless.

Here are some more quotes from the prospectus:

(p21) The Advisor believes that growing demands on existing energy supplies, in particular petroleum-based energy supplies, could lead to higher prices for this and other traditional energy sources and the profitable development of alternative sources of energy.
(p22) You may lose money by investing in this Fund if any of the following occur:
a. Stocks that comprise the energy sector decline in value;
b. Prices of energy (oil, gas, electricity) or alternative energy supplies decline, which would likely have a negative affect on the Fund’s holdings;
c. A government expropriates or nationalizes assets of the Fund or companies in which the Fund invests;
d. Political, social or economic instability causes the Fund’s holdings to decline
(p28) Prices and supplies of energy may fluctuate significantly over any time period due to many factors, including international political developments; production and distribution policies of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other oil-producing countries; relationships among OPEC members and other oil-producing countries and between these countries and oil-importing nations; energy conservation; the regulatory environment; tax policies; and the economic growth and political stability of the key energy-consuming countries.

Wow! This sounds like a great fund to me! Anyone else interested in buying in now?
theoildrum.blogspot.com



To: manalagi who wrote (361)6/19/2005 9:44:01 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24207
 
Reid also sees a bright future. "Right now regular solar cells are experiencing tremendous supply problems; the industry is sold out until 2007," he says. "At the same time about 19 states have mandated that electricity producers must currently generate some power from green sources."
Solar Flair in Halfmoon

By Lawrence Carrel Published: June 9, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DayStar Technologies, Inc. (DSTI)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share price as of Wednesday's close: $6.88
Share price now: $11.09
Change: 61.2%
Volume: 3.9 million shares, daily average 197,100 shares
Last time this high: All-time high
52-week high: $8.90
52-week low: $1.43
Forward P/E before announcement: n/a
Forward P/E after announcement: n/a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXXON MOBIL (XOM) shares gained 3% Thursday as crude prices topped $54 a barrel. But the hottest play on costly energy traded on the Nasdaq, where shares of DayStar Technologies (DSTI) sparkled.
The designer of silicon-free solar-power cells just signed its first big commercial contract. Traders enthralled by the technology's potential and the tiny stock's momentum bid it up 61% to an all-time high of $11.09.

Blitzstrom, a leading European maker of solar power equipment, agreed to buy DayStar's TerraFoil cells through 2008. The pact could be worth up to $60 million based on current market prices for photovoltaic cells, according to the company.

"This is a big deal for them. DayStar hasn't sold a thing yet and now it's hooking up with a serious partner," says Kenneth Reid, editor of Spear's Security Industry Analyst. He is following DayStar because of its technology's potential to power surveillance drones. "In addition to using DayStar products as is, it looks like Blitzstrom is going to incorporate some of DayStar's technology into its existing product line."

DayStar, based in Halfmoon, N.Y., designs low-cost, high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) cells that convert sunlight into energy. Its patented processes make silicon-free Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) cells and deposits them onto lightweight flexible metal foils and substrates. DayStar Chairman and Chief Executive John Tuttle pioneered commercial applications of the 20-year-old CIGS technology when he worked at the Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, according to the company.

DayStar believes its TerraFoil, an alternative to wafer silicon solar cells, can produce electricity at competitive rates and without some of the drawbacks of the fragile silicon wafers.

Silicon's main problem is that it's also needed by the fast-growing chip industry, which enjoys higher margins and can therefore pay a higher price. DayStar hopes to capitalize on the current world-wide shortage of the material.

Alternative energy suppliers are enjoying quite a growth spurt of their own. According to PV News, a monthly newsletter for the photovoltaic industry, the industry has grown about 40% annually for the past six years, posting sales for installed systems of $7.4 billion in 2004. That is expected to grow to at least $24 billion by 2010.

Peter Lynch, the former head of business development for DayStar and currently a consultant to the company, says it has identified 48 projects around the globe that require its type of solar cell.

Reid also sees a bright future. "Right now regular solar cells are experiencing tremendous supply problems; the industry is sold out until 2007," he says. "At the same time about 19 states have mandated that electricity producers must currently generate some power from green sources."

DayStar will begin shipments to Blitzstrom in the third quarter and continue monthly, increasing in volume through 2008. The company expects contract costs to exceed revenues until it updates its production line, likely by the end of 2006.

Production constraints are one of DayStar's biggest issues. The nine-year-old company can currently manufacture less than one megawatt worth of cells a year. It expects to ramp up to as many as two megawatts by the middle of next year. By 2008, Day Star hopes to be making enough cells to generate 50 megawatts.

But those plans highlight DayStar's other problem, financing. The microcap company still has no timetable for turning a profit.

For 2004, DayStar posted a net loss of $4.7 million on revenues of $157,412. As of March 31, it had $2.2 million in cash after posting a first-quarter net loss of $1.4 million on revenues of just $34,597.

DayStar went public in February 2004. At the time, it sold 2.1 million warrants exercisable at $6 and 4.2 million warrants exercisable at $10.

"It has always been our business plan to augment our finances through various mechanisms, and we are working on those as we speak," says Tom Polich, DayStar's general counsel. "We have no immediate plans to do a secondary offering. However, the $6 warrants are callable at $8.50 and we plan to call them in. That will bring $10 million to $12 million. But as we advance the technology, hopefully that will draw more funding sources to us."

"I think the CIGS technology has the potential to become the lowest-cost solar-generating technology," says David Kurzman, general partner of Kurzman Partners, a New York hedge fund. "But it does have some drawbacks, such as capacity. It's not commercially available in quantity. Today's announcement provides visibility up to 30 megawatts of backlog through 2008. It will give DayStar a substantial leg up to its efforts to reach profitability, which I suspect it could reach with well under 25 megawatts of production per year." Kurzman, a former Wall Street analyst of renewable energy technologies, has considered investing in DayStar but decided to hold off for now.

Quote:
"Considering the significant costs to ramp up production, I forecast it could hit profitability in 2007," says Kurzman. "But it has to get these warrants converted quickly. If the warrants don't bring in enough money DayStar could face a cash crunch by the end of the year. I suspect it would be in its best interest to raise some more money in the next one to two years to get some Wall Street sponsorship. It has the technology and the people, so it's a good start. But, I'm not investing my money in this yet. It needs sufficient free cash flow to be a good sustainable investment. It's a matter of executing on the business plan."

Neither Kurzman nor Reid owns DayStar shares. Kurzman Partners and Spear's Security Industry Analyst don't have a business relationship with the company
smartmoney.com