SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (67673)6/16/2005 5:26:48 PM
From: Rick Julian  Respond to of 71178
 
I mean
You mean
They mean
We mean

Having no dogs means no hair clouds in the corners of your rooms.

Having no dogs mean no hair clouds in the corners of your rooms.

If this sentence is analogous, then it's means, eh?



To: Rambi who wrote (67673)6/16/2005 5:26:48 PM
From: Rick Julian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
I mean
You mean
They mean
We mean

Having no dogs means no hair clouds in the corners of your rooms.

Having no dogs mean no hair clouds in the corners of your rooms.

If this sentence is analogous, then it's means, eh?



To: Rambi who wrote (67673)6/16/2005 5:29:02 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
Fowler didn't help, but I found this in my old Harbrace- which might be what I was thinking of...

(or should I say " might be that of which I was thinking")

When regarded as a unit, collective nouns as well as noun phrases denoting quantity, take singular verbs

"A thousand bushels IS a good yield"

SO if you are thinking of NO HOLES as a collective descriptive unit -- I would go with the singular.

But I am not an English teacher!



To: Rambi who wrote (67673)6/16/2005 8:26:43 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
Have pulled out my Fowler's and am now researching.

A name you can trust. <g>