SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (65111)6/16/2005 7:23:30 PM
From: BlackDog777  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
FBI inspector general’s report: more evidence of government complicity in 9/11 attacks
By Patrick Martin
15 June 2005


Good link Raymond. (sarcasm) I'm sure most readers of the Silicon Investor Booms, Busts, & Recoveries thread are avid readers of the World Socialist Web Site. I'm sure Mr. Martin is a very objective writer. (more sarcasm) I checked out their website after reading the article...it was nice to brush up on my Leon Trotsky history. (more sarcasm) It's too bad Uncle Joe took him out, he was on to something there.

Best to you.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (65111)6/17/2005 1:48:06 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Well, Tony Blair decided we were going to invade Iraq and went out of his way to find the evidence needed.

Alistair Campbell was the the guy to it. Well done Microsoft word..

tvtechnology.com

casi.org.uk

However, I do not buy the "controlled demolition" theory of the WTC's. All of the observed phenomena have ordinary explanations. When strong made parts are tested to destruction they go bang. Plain and simple. If the WTC's were going to be brought down using controlled explosions, without removing and of the structure first, you would have lots and lots of big explosions all over the place.