SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (106087)6/16/2005 10:00:42 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Sweet Jesus, is someone arguing that people should be allowed to drive stoned?

It would appear Grainne is suggesting this.

At the very least, she contends that persons under the influence of marijuana don't cause fatal accidents.

Message 21417691



To: redfish who wrote (106087)6/17/2005 9:44:20 AM
From: mph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I knew we'd agree on something eventually<g>



To: redfish who wrote (106087)6/17/2005 10:53:46 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I'm not arguing that people should be allowed to drive stoned. I am simply arguing that drunk drivers are a lot more dangerous and reckless, and that if I had to choose between drunk drivers or stoned drivers, I would definitely choose stoned ones. But no one should drive impaired in any way, and that should also include being to tired or sleepy to drive safely.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News