SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mmmary who wrote (8503)6/16/2005 9:29:33 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
It took almost two years for the judge to rule on jurisdiction? Imagine the legal fees if you were, like most other people, forced to use a lawyer? The killer part if failing to state a claim. That essentially says the lawsuit was an entire waste of everyone's time. Congratulations on winning, but my sympathies for having to endure it.

- Jeff



To: mmmary who wrote (8503)6/16/2005 9:59:55 PM
From: SI Dave  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
The motion granted was improper venue? After all that time?

So, that means it was dismissed without prejudice? Bummer, unless that's what you were looking for, I suppose.



To: mmmary who wrote (8503)6/21/2005 9:03:13 AM
From: kknightmcc  Respond to of 12465
 
All she won was on jurisdiction. There will be an appeal filed since she lied in the Affidavit that the judge relied on to make her ruling. Evidence that she lied was supplied to the court but not taken into consideration. So she can crow all she wants, but that doesn't end it for her just yet.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News