Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: randy johnson who wrote (3116)	6/17/2005 1:35:56 AM
From: olivier asser	Respond to of 3143

You can respectfully disagree all you like, and I can receive PM's that question what this means, but you were not in Court on Tuesday. Judge Markow stated to the Assistant Attorney General from the bench as follows, and I quote: *YOUR CLIENTS CAUSED MR. ASSER SEVERE DAMAGE.*

To: randy johnson who wrote (3116)	6/17/2005 1:40:44 AM
From: olivier asser	Respond to of 3143

A demurrer is quite different than a 12(b)(6) motion, and by filing it the defendants in this case took quite a risk. I repeat: Demurrer An answer to a complaint at civil law that does not dispute the facts of the complaint but contends that the facts, even if true, do not constitute a wrongdoing. Nice try though. By overruling the demurrer, the judge in fact HAS ruled on the merits of this case.

To: randy johnson who wrote (3116)	6/17/2005 1:44:39 AM
From: olivier asser	Respond to of 3143

Now maybe Berber and Moor should not have claimed in their vexatious litigant motion that I sued the Tax Commissioner and the Department of Taxation merely because they were trying to collect taxes. The Presiding Judge of the Richmond Circuit Court has just ruled that I sued them for violating the Civil Rights Act, and that those claims have merit. End of story. Those of you who are attorneys, you will understand the import of an order as succinct as that handed down yesterday.