SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (63380)6/17/2005 4:43:01 PM
From: lorneRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
dippy. You said...."And they were in Kurdistan. Saddam couldn't even step in there because of the No Fly Zone restrictions."....

Not entirely correct...but then you seldom if ever are correct.

ILL-JUDGED INTERVENTIONS
iticwebarchives.ssrc.org

Gradually, the US began to justify the southern no-fly zone more as a means of reassuring its allies in the Gulf that Iraqi planes would be kept far away from their airspace. Then, under the Clinton administration's policy of "containment" of Iraq, both no-fly zones became part of the vague objective to "keep up the pressure on Saddam." In the north, the CIA began to support efforts by Iraqi opposition groups to stage an attack and possibly a coup attempt from Iraqi Kurdistan.

The result of this ill-judged effort was an Iraqi military incursion into Erbil in September 1996, the first major movement of Iraqi troops into the Kurdish-controlled zone since 1991. Opposition members fled or were killed and all UN humanitarian aid personnel left the north. Instead of challenging the short-lived Iraqi incursion, or attacking the advancing Iraqi troops, the US chose to attack targets in the south and unilaterally extend the southern no-fly zone to the 33rd parallel. As the Bush administration moves to support the Iraqi opposition in its attempt to operate once again inside the northern no-fly zone, and across the Iranian border into the south, it would be well-advised not to forget the past history of "adventures" in the no-fly zones.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (63380)6/17/2005 7:32:11 PM
From: Dan B.Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
And I recall one in the north, which Saddams men visited upon occasion. Another not in the north though, and that'd be the one with the airplane fuselage, and accompanying testimony that Saudi's were training there.

Dan B.