SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34432)6/17/2005 6:32:53 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Santorum must go! Nazi statement disgraceful!
And Cheney too for saying "F you" on the Senate floor.
Disgraceful. Also Tom DElay for being so corupt and paying himsel;f $500,000. He has to go. And GW, Rummy, Condi and Cheney for lying about the WMD's threat. They have to go.

etc.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34432)6/17/2005 6:35:09 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Santorum's Nazi Statement Disgraceful

Yesterday, Senator Rick Santorum took to the floor of the United States Senate and compared the Democrats use of the filibuster to that of Adolph Hitler's invasion of France. It seems he likes to compare anything he finds having a 'secular' influence to the Nazis:
I just want to remind people of societies over the last couple of centuries that have been secular in nature, and see what, what the results of that. Starting with the French Revolution; moving on to the last century to the Fascists, and yes the Nazis, and then the Communists and the Baathists. All of those purely sects. Hated religion. Tried to crush religion. That's the kind of peaceful public square that the New York Times would advocate for.

So not only is Santorum comparing the New York Times to Nazis, but also to the French, the Communists, and Saddam's regime. Why? Because being "secular" is bad! Santorum, and all the rest of the Right Wing Religious Extremists want a theocracy, not a Democracy. In his mind, this is a country founded not on life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and based on the rule of law. To Santorum this is a country based on the word of God. And not just any word of God. His God. His Bible. His interpretation. He presumes to know the mind of the founders, even though many of whom were Masons!

I believe in one God. But I'll be damned if I'll push my beliefs on anyone else, let alone to try to presume to determine which set of beliefs are right and which are wrong. Santorum has no such qualms, and that is what makes him dangerous.