SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spheres who wrote (65197)6/18/2005 9:41:46 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Re: Have you considered whether a Molotov cocktail, explosive vest, or a rock launching sling (slingshot), could be considered, under certain circumstances, WMD’s?

It's actually stretching the point to call biological or chemical weapons "weapons of mass destruction". Clearly they are not. Mass destruction must have a lower limit.

The firebombing of Dresden and Tokyo during WW II each ought to be considered acts of barbarism, war crimes and instances of WMD abuse.

35,000 innocents died in the Dresden firebombing of February, 1945. About 120,000 civilians (mostly women and children) died in Toyko firebombing the night of June 9-10, 1945.

The U.S. and British military were guilty of heinous war crimes in these instances, as was the U.S. military in the politically motivated incineration of another 150,000 Japanese civilians in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic conflagrations.

Only because we live in a world where the victor is never held up for criminal prosecution can such barbaric acts of terrorism go unpunished.

***
Is a single Molotov cocktail a WMD? That seems to be a silly extension of the term WMD, the same thing as with the notion that a slingshot could possibly fall into the category..

For real examples of sheer terror and WMD abuse, it's hard to top the U.S. military's efforts. In fact, it can't be done.

U.S.A - We're #1!