Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (120733)	6/18/2005 2:35:19 PM
From: MrLucky	Respond to of 793758

:-)

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (120733)	6/20/2005 9:14:46 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 793758

I didnt expect Kerry to turn out to be as weak a candidate as he was. I think Bush/McCain or Bush/Giuliani would have a won a much larger victory. My Rumsfeld suggeston has to do with his failures as DOD chief and not much to do about politics although i might have spun it as a positive for reelection. A right wing left wing match up still gives the reps a narrow edge but one of the two parties may wise up and move toward the center. The 2006 election which if one was predicting at this point would be a victory for the dems imo, may change the dynamics further. To help in 2006, the reps need some perceived success in iraq or at least a better news environement with less suicide bombings. Also, a more liberal stem cell position would help as well as a few bills passed by congress thru some sort of consensus approach would play well for a nation that has such little regard for congress. Mike