SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (20520)6/18/2005 3:20:26 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
"You may be right that there may not be universal agreement; but this does not mean there may not be rational agreement amongst rational people."

LOL. Yes, and since we know that you are rational, and therefore right, then anyone who disagrees with you is by definition irrational.

"The reasoned position at which a creature with human dna becomes a LEGAL PERSON is at the point which it has inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Circular definition, Solon. If they must be a "legal person" in order to have rights, then you can't define what is a legal person by whether or not they have rights.

"Prior to this, there is no capacity for society to grant it these rights without aborting these rights in the mother."

Nonsense.

"People who wish to ignore the issue of rights and simply seek a developmental solution to the question ..."

You certainly haven't found me doing that.

"So, if they say, for example, the fetus should be a legal person at 7 months, then why not at 6 months and 29 days--and so forth all the way back to conception and even before."

Like I said, an arbitrary point. Yours is no less arbitrary, regardless of your confidence in your powers of reason.

"So called "pro-life" people (what a misnomer) have their entire answer in [blah blah blah] And don't impose your superstitious beliefs [blah blah blah]"

Thanks for propping up the straw man, Solon. The crows were eating my corn.

"Laws exist to interpret, judge, and enforce. I would love to hear of a hypothetical where actual rights were in conflict. But I never have."

You need to get out more. Conflicting rights are all around you.

Or you could read some Locke about the origins of organized society and government.