SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (120759)6/18/2005 8:57:21 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793842
 
One would not have to reduce regulations. One would only have to make regulations certain. As in if you do these things you are permitted. What we have is endless litigation that has nothing to do with regulation - only interferrence prevention by endless uncertainty.

The left has developed the deny by litigation techinque to a tee. Remember - it took an act of Congress to build the Trans Alaskan Pipeline. To many the only answer is NO! There is no thinking - the answer is NO! By definition the answer is NO.

My that sounds a lot like Harry Reid!



To: Snowshoe who wrote (120759)6/18/2005 9:06:22 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793842
 
what could California do to compete with China and India for scarce supplies of global oil?

Pay for it. It's fungible, and available for the right price. I know that it will never happen in California, the greens there are still too strong.