Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Gold and Silver Stocks and Related Commentary -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (14442)	6/19/2005 4:48:39 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18308

Wow! I'm banned from your thread for not being a perma-bull on the general stock market and asking questions, but when you show up here, you are free game. Let's try the last question I asked you which resulted partially in my banning: Can you show exactly what you were recommending people do from April, 2000 until October, 2002? My guess is you were telling everyone the very same thing -- "The market's are not overvalued. Stocks are going to go right back up. Back up the truck at these bargain prices." Just my guess, but let's hear it from you. Surely, the ones who have been saying "never invest in the stock market" have perhaps not gained the best returns they could have, but I'd venture to guess that those who first became bullish during a bubble or continued to put all their money in during the fall, have lost a great deal more and will never get back to where they were. New question -- Do you honestly believe that Greenspasm and the government can orchestrate an exit from all this debt or that the debt can climb and sustain the world's economies forever with never a catastrophe? You really believe printing more and more funny money can keep people at the current lifestyle pace forever? If you believe this, can you tell us why -- unlike a paid shill for the gov't and wallstreet like Krudlow, who simply goes on and on laughing at others for their beliefs but offering nothing of substance. He always falls back on simply finding one escape goat who made a wrong call on timing and saying basically what you always say -- "So and so has been saying to get out of the market or so and so called a market top at such and such a date, so why even listen to those negative bears?" He's like a school kid in a playground argument. Why can't one of you have a simple debate with someone like Puplava or Roach and have each side forced to answer and give actual thoughts on why they think what they do? My guess is that they would have Krudlow sitting speechless and erupting into a blathering idiot or simply flying off the handle and screaming nonsense. Let's see if you can give an honest and complete and rational answer to these questions, or if you will dodge them by offering an insult or changing the subject or just ignoring them. Which is it, cheif? We really want to hear an understandable answer and not just "I'm right and you are wrong, naaa, naaa." I remain, SOROS