SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (106329)6/19/2005 6:22:41 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Chronicling Conflict

By Ben Bush, Bitch Magazine. Posted June 18, 2005.

Photographer Mimi Chakarova has traveled the world chronicling war, sex trafficking and assaults on human rights. But instead of shocking viewers, her images provoke important questions.

In Ghana, while photographing on an international reporting trip, a car full of young men grabbed the strap of Mimi Chakarova's camera bag and attempted to drive off with it. Chakarova wouldn't let go of the camera case, and was dragged behind the car for half a block until the case's double-stitched strap broke. "I just couldn't stand the thought of some German tourist buying my Leica for 100 dollars," she says.

Chakarova, a documentary photographer who teaches journalism at UC Berkeley, is currently immersed in two long-term projects documenting the military standoff in Kashmir and sex trafficking of women in Eastern Europe. Born in Bulgaria under communism, Chakarova grew up in a village "running barefoot and playing with the chickens."

At the age of thirteen her family traveled to Baltimore, Maryland on a three-month exchange program sponsored by her father's research position at Johns Hopkins University. Chakarova spoke no English, and the inner-city public school she attended classified her as developmentally disabled.

She held down three jobs in order to afford her first camera, which allowed her to communicate visually rather than verbally. She began her work in fine arts photography, receiving a BFA from the San Francisco Art Institute before becoming frustrated with the endless introspection of the art world and turning to journalism, finding the field's outward gaze refreshing.

Not yet 30, Chakarova's photography has led her to travel all over the world. Her graduate thesis documented living conditions and human rights in Africa and the Caribbean, and her photos of the daily lives of Cubans surviving in the country's two rival economies: the black market and withering Communism are featured in Capitalism, God and a Good Cigar: Cuba Enters the 21st Century, forthcoming from Duke University Press. "My mother asked me recently, 'Mimi, it's taken us so long to get out of poverty, why do you keep going back?' I said, 'Because it's so familiar, Mom."

Kashmir

The disputed region of Kashmir, located between the two nuclear powers of India and Pakistan, has suffered an estimated 80,000-90,000 fatalities as a result of the conflict hinging on the national and religious dividing line between the Hindu and Muslim countries. Flare-ups between regional militants and Indian troops stationed in the region create a climate of perpetual war.

A recent exhibit of Chakarova's photos of Kashmir at the San Francisco World Affairs Council of Northern California depicts a world of torture, forced relocation, decimated villages, and traumatized civilians. Chakarova focuses on the war's impact on civilians, specifically women, who she believes disproportionately bear the war's hardship.

In one of her photos, beds are lined up across the front lawn of a psychiatric hospital. The facility is filled beyond capacity, as the war invokes not only physical injuries but also cases of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. The exhibit's text explains that women in the region attempt suicide with an unusual frequency -- on average, 5 to 7 attempts per day are recorded. (In hopes of forgiveness, attempts are most frequent on Fridays, the holiest day of the week in Islamic tradition.) Most choose to consume toxic organo-phosphorus pesticides used in agriculture. A young woman working in rural development, quoted in the exhibit, declares, "I am fighting a war on two fronts; I am fighting a patriarchal society and also dealing with the conflict that's existed here since I got out of school."

After photographing a massacre which included women, children, the elderly, and the disabled, Chakarova chose to exhibit only a photograph of the evidence left behind. After the 23 bodies were removed for burial, a flip-flop sandal leaned against the padded armrest of a crutch, and a woman's shoe rested against a dark stain of blood on the autumn leaves of the forest floor.

Feeling that viewers are already inundated with violent images, Chakarova prefers images that raise questions instead of the short-lived attention gained through shock value. Instead of titling her photos, Chakarova captions them with descriptions of the conflict's history and excerpts of interviews. A man clasps the head of his tortured brother, perhaps dead; beneath the image is his, rather than Chakarova's, explanation of what has happened. "They blindfolded him, poured salt and pepper in his wounds and electrocuted him."

In a picture of a military bunker, an enormous gun leans against a wall plastered with photos of naked blond women and clothed Indian fashion models, diligently cut out in silhouette. "I LOVE MY INDIA" is scrawled across it in white chalk. Chakarova's caption describes her encounter with a general, who as a matter of national security, forbid her from photographing inside the military camp.

"Kashmir was incredibly lonely," Chakarova remembers. "All of my friends were male journalists. As a woman, once it gets dark you can't wander the streets because there are soldiers everywhere." She took to sleeping with her film in her pillowcase, partially to guard it but also to stave off feelings of total isolation. "The majority of people I've met don't want to be part of India or Pakistan; they feel like they've been used." Chakarova will be returning to Kashmir in the summer and plans to release the project as a book.

Sex trafficking

An Eastern European complexion has become synonymous with prostitution. On the streets of Turkey, men would holler at Chakarova, calling her "Natasha." From Dubai to Israel to southeast Asia -- wherever women migrate from the economically depressed post-communist Eastern European countries -- prostitutes are known simply as "Natashas."


Shaista, an educated 24-year-old lecturer at the local university, meets her husband for the first time at an engagement party arranged by a professional matchmaker. Kashmir, 2003.
While it is not uncommon for women from these regions, desperate for money for themselves and their families, to emigrate to wealthier regions to find employment in sex work, trafficking is something else entirely. As with all sex trafficking, these girls are often duped into indentured sexual servitude, often believing they are being transported to work in the mainstream service industry.

"One girl grabbed my arm and said 'Do you want to know how it was? 30 customers per day, the youngest was 11 and the oldest was 83,’" Chakarova recalls. She quotes another anonymous girl: "Some of the men felt sorry for me when they saw I was pregnant, but they still had sex with me."

Chakarova and her collaborator, writer Lauren Gard, traveled to Moldova, which has the highest incidence of trafficked girls and, not coincidentally, is also the poorest country in Europe. Located between Romania and the Ukraine, Moldova's living standards fell post-communism, with poverty still on the rise and wage discrepancies between men and women growing at a rapid pace.

Through a shelter frequented by girls who had been trafficked, Chakarova and Gard met Olesea. Their project retraces her path from Moldova to Turkey, where Chakarova's fractured Russian, dredged up from childhood, allowed them to pose as girls looking for work in order to meet one of Olesea's clients. Through him, they made contact with her pimp.

"Here, I have my credentials and my affiliation with the University of California," Chakarova explains. "There, that was all gone -- all he saw was a girl from Bulgaria looking for work. Imagine having a man stare at you and evaluate you like cattle based on your appearance, the way you talk and how you move. Everything about you has a certain price. This pimp was notorious for doing sadistic shit to these girls. I had seen the scars and I had heard the stories. These guys know how to perform abortions and how to hit you so you don't bruise. They raped the girls many times. He didn't know that we knew any of this. He was giving us his best facade, which is ‘We're gonna be partners, fifty-fifty.’ I knew he was offering to buy us, and if we were ignorant and desperate village girls, we would look at him as our savior."

For reporters who want to do more than interview girls after the fact, there are two routes to a first-hand account. Women journalists pose as girls looking for work, but for male journalists reporting on sex trafficking in Kashmir for American and European newspapers and magazines, their option is to pose as customers.

Chakarova comments that because of the male photojournalists’ pose as customers, their images often resemble soft-core porn, playing up the issue's sex appeal. "In a lot of the cases, the girls are wearing a bra and bikini and lots of makeup. It's almost like lingerie ads. The photos show no insight into who they truly are."

Chakarova sees this as contributing to an inability to see the underlying causes of trafficking. "I read everything there was on sex trafficking in Moldova and always there was the same bullshit, which is 'Why is the demand so high for girls particularly from Moldova? Because they're incredibly beautiful.' That's the stereotype, and journalists publishing these photographs and printing these words are adding to the stereotype because people read this and think 'I want a girl from Moldova because they're notorious for being gorgeous.' Guess what? These girls who have been trafficked and at the high schools in the villages, they're not supermodels. They're just ordinary girls with pimples and imperfections. Ordinary girls living in really poor circumstances."

With her basic Russian, Chakarova was only able to ask simple questions of the girls, like "What happened?" But when she did, girls would spill over with information. "On several occasions, I said 'Why are you telling me all this? Why are you giving me so much?' and they said, 'You're the only one who isn't judging me for what has happened to me.’"

Chakarova spent time photographing the shelters in Moldova where the girls were living. "To me it's really important sometimes just to put the camera away and be a person, be compassionate and be yourself. The main thing for me is just to be there and make girls laugh, dance in front of them, say something in Russian that's really silly. Just make them laugh. Do you know how good that feels when I know what they've been through? They're at a shelter and we're all smoking and they're just giggling like they should be because they're 19 and 20. I don't have pictures of that, because I was actually experiencing it. A lot of photographers are always behind the camera and quit experiencing what's in front of them. I want to be able to say 'Fuck it, I'm not going to have these shots, I'm not going to take pictures right now. They see that: 'So she's not just taking and taking and taking; she's actually giving something in return.' That's what I mean when I say I leave behind pieces of myself."

To contact Mimi Chakarova or view her photographs and other projects, visit www.mclight.com. "Capitalism, God and a Good Cigar: Cuba Enters the 21st Century," (Duke University Press) features over 70 of Chakarova's documentary photos of Cuba.

Ben Bush is a frequent contributor to Bitch, Kitchen Sink and XLR8R.

« AlterNet Home Story Tools: EMAIL PRINT BUY COMMENTS



COMMENTS GIVE US FEEDBACK »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View: Threaded Minimal Flat Flat Unthreaded
good work.
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 12:33 PM [Report this comment]

I like Mimi Chakarova & her work. In the glut of media coverage of tragedy, trauma, & horror, the public tends to develop emotional shields, per se. There is so much info. about far away places & so many discussions of pain that the victims of tragedies can lose their humanity to those being informed. Please don't misunderstand. I'm not saying that such victims are non-humans, i'm saying that with all the info, they become faceless. The victims become examples, statistics, or mere "headshots" for issues so painful that it's easier to percieve them as too distant to be human.

Ironically, even marketers for change dehumanize. For instance, i read a magazine ad soliciting money to "help orphans for only a dollar a day." Glancing at the photos, I saw an updated shot of Sally Struthers, but the same photo of the same hungry big-eyed toddler that i'd seen for decades. That child, i thought, had either survived into adulthood on the "pennies" a day solicited in the past, or had died. Either way, the person in campaign. Someone, maybe, but not with her face.

I noticed similar media coverage. For instance the public is shocked by reports & photographs of reports on different issues in Africa. Perhaps for dramatic effect, the reports tend to both ovewhelm and to magnify the "exotic," romanticizing those effected by drought, famine, and violence. With such input, I start doubting my "right" to interfere, thinking momentarily & incorrectly, that these ancient peoples are like story folk, part of a movie that evokes emotion to watch from the comfort of my modern home. So separate, I even have insane "guilty american" spasms, thinking maybe it's best not to intervene with such noble old souls. But beneath the stories and stock photos are real people, prefering not to be hungry, thirsty, sick, or hacked with machetes.

The work of people like Mimi C, can help re-sensitize the American public. I was impressed that in the shelter for the rescued girls, she didn't photograph the giggling girls since she was experiencing them. In this, she recognizes the individuality of her subjects. That respect & recognition shows in her work. Her photographs are of human beings who giggle, grieve, hunger, & experience life, just as we all do. With the faces of tragedy rehumanized, we can begin see them as ourselves & our neighbors & feel able to help.

alternet.org



To: Grainne who wrote (106329)6/20/2005 1:11:42 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
The real problem with meat is that it is a status symbol in developing nations. Sort of like smoking, it is declining in America as the health risks become fully known,

It would surprise me if there were credible statistics showing a significant decline in the consumption of meat in this country. According to the USDA, probably an agency you don't much care for but I see no reason to doubt their basic statistics, a recent report stated

"Meat Consumption at Record High
"Now more than ever, America is a Nation of meat eaters. In 2000, total meat consumption (red meat, poultry, and fish) reached 195 pounds (boneless, trimmed-weight equivalent) per person, 57 pounds above average annual consumption in the 1950s (table 2-1). Each American consumed an average of 7 pounds more red meat than in the 1950s, 46 pounds more poultry, and 4 pounds more fish and shellfish. Rising consumer incomes, especially with the increase in two-income households, and meat prices in the 1990s that were often at 50-year lows, when adjusted for inflation, explain much of the increase in meat consumption. In addition, the meat industry has provided scores of new brand-name, value-added products processed for consumers’ convenience, as well as a host of products for foodservice operators."
usda.gov

The report does go on to say that consumers are responding to concerns about fat by buying leaner cuts of meat. I know in our family this is true -- we are eating as much meat as before, but are eating leaner, organically grown beef. But Costco seems to continue to sell large quantities of meat. And with the popularity of the Atkins diet, I don't see Vegan

I agree that a number of young people at various times adopt vegetarian diets, but as I have watched our children's friends over the years, this has tended to be a fad which is dropped within a year or two.

I understand that there are true believers in Veganism (as there are true believers in many other causes, from Peace on Earth to a firm belief in UFOs and the Loch Ness monster -- true belief is a fairly common aspect of the human psyche), but frankly I think they are no more likely to be successful in creating a vegan world than my pacifist friends will be in creating a world without violence.

Both may be admirable goals. But when it comes down to it, humans over the millenia have proved remarkably resilient to resisting admirable goals that require them to give up cherished traditions.



To: Grainne who wrote (106329)6/22/2005 1:27:02 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
It is my understanding that beef consumption in particular is down per capita in America, but I could be wrong. I will include an article which supports this, though, for your perusal.

Saturday :: Apr 16, 2005
HERE'S The Beef!
Back in the 1984 Presidential Primary Campaign, Senator Fritz Mondale quoted actress Clara Peller's famous line from a Wendy's commercial - "Where's the beef?" - when attacking Senator Gary Hart's proposals, successfully as it turned out.

Americans swallow a lot of beef (even the real thing!):

Adjusted for inflation, Americans spent $355 per capita on beef in 1980. In 2001, they spent $200." - Judd Slivka. From "Ranchers a dying breed: West's once-thriving cattle industry suffering." The Arizona Republic (July 15, 2002).
That is an average of 67 pounds per capita.

That's 268 Quarter Pounders for all you Red Staters - roughly one per workday per year.

Because you swallow so much beef, you might want to be aware of the following, provided to the American Beef Industry courtesy of The Best Government Corporate Campaign Contributions Can Buy:

Bush considers easing a rule on the food supply, put in place after first mad cow case

The USDA prohibited all so-called downer cattle — those too sick or injured to walk — from being slaughtered for human food after a Washington state dairy cow was diagnosed with bovine spongiform encephalopathy in December 2003.

This is your brain

Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis has been connected to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among others. This is NOT A GOOD THING:

Strong evidence indicates that BSE has been transmitted to humans primarily in the United Kingdom, causing a variant form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). As of December 1, 2003, a total of 153 vCJD cases had been reported worldwide; of these, 143 cases had occurred in the United Kingdom.
As a public service that The Best Government Corporate Campaign Contributions Can Buy no longer wants to provide, The Left Coaster presents our public health warning:

Bovine-CJD: might you already have it? Early warnings: insomnia, memory loss, depression, anxiety, withdrawal, fearfulness.

This is your brain on beef

Sounds like your typical Red Staters - or the entire US Congress.

So why is Bu$hCo willing to sacrifice your health?

Remember what Deep Throat said? "Follow the money"? That's what it's all about:

"The beef industry says more beef is being eaten now than ever. But that's a function of a growing population. Most Americans eat less beef than in 1970; per capita consumption of beef has fallen 11 percent, while chicken consumption has gone up 68 percent, and turkey demand has gone up 74 percent. - Judd Slivka. From "Ranchers a dying breed: West's once-thriving cattle industry suffering." The Arizona Republic (July 15, 2002).
The Beef Industry agrees with this assessment, and provides the motivation for Bu$hCo's actions:

Beef's marketplace dominance in virtually every measurable statistical category has fallen off dramatically since 1975. At the same time, beef's center-of-the-plate competition has wasted no time seizing market share we once held.
The net result? Analysts say that ours is a mature and declining business - and the statistics seem to bear this out. For the better part of 25 years, the beef industry's share of the consumer meat market has been eroding ... and unless something is done to reverse this trend the industry stands to continue its downward slide.

Beef's loss of market share means less profit opportunity for producers. Only through increased consumer expenditures will the flow of dollars increase in the beef system and enhance producer profit opportunities. An 11.9 percent loss of market share since 1980 resulted in a $12.84 billion cost to the industry in 1996 alone. Recovery of half of this lost market share would have meant an increase of $9 per hundredweight in the price of a fed steer in 1996.

One problem is that we need to make money on the whole carcass. Middle meats are increasing in value, but they only comprise 25 percent of the carcass. Trimmings and cuts from the chuck and round, on the other hand, have decreased dramatically in value over the past five years, while making up 66 percent of carcass weight.

Now factor in the complete ban from the market of a diseased animal, and you can begin to see why the cattlemen of America are concerned that we aren't buying their products like we used to. Do they see what the problem is? No:

Consumers perceive beef as inconvenient and difficult to prepare. They’re interested in (and willing to try) new recipes, when they have time. They’re often faced with too many things to do and not enough time to do them all. The solution to the time dilemma is often turning to a meal solution their families can enjoy and that also is quick and easy.
No recognition that consumers aren't interested in eating foods that might cause major health problems - and I'm ignoring for the moment the fat content of beef which began the anti-red meat movement. As the authors of Mad Cow USA [PDF] put it:

The book was released just before the infamous Texas trial of Oprah Winfrey and her guest Howard Lyman for the alleged crime of "food disparagement". It was the livestock feed industry that led the effort in the early 1990s to lobby into law the Texas food disparagement act, and when an uppity Oprah hosted a program in April 1996 featuring rancher-turned vegan activist Howard Lyman, she and her guest became the first people sued for the crime of sullying the good name of beef. Oprah eventually won her lawsuit, but it cost her years of legal battling and millions of dollars. In reality, the public lost, because mainstream media stopped covering the issue of mad cow disease. As one TV network producer told me at the time, his orders were to keep his network from being sued the way Oprah had been.
Our activism won us some interesting enemies, such as Richard Berman, a Republican lobbyist who runs an industry-funded front group that calls itself the Center for Consumer Freedom. Berman is a darling of the tobacco, booze, biotech and food industries, and with their funding he issued an online report depicting us as the ring leaders of a dangerous conspiracy of vegetarian food terrorists out to destroy the U.S. food system.

Of course, he had an easier time attacking us before the emergence of mad cow disease in America. I was saddened but not surprised when mad cow disease was finally discovered in the United States.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture knew more than a decade ago that to prevent mad cow disease in America would require a strict ban on "animal cannibalism," the feeding of rendered slaughterhouse waste from cattle to cattle as protein and fat supplements, but refused to support the ban because it would cost the meat industry money.

When the first North American cow with the disease was found last May [2004] in Canada, I told interviewers that if the disease was in Canada, it would also be found in the United States and Mexico, since all three NAFTA nations are one big free trade zone and all three countries feed their cattle slaughterhouse waste in the form of blood, fat and rendered meat and bone meal.

In fact, calves in North America are literally weaned on milk formula containing "raw spray dried cattle blood plasma" even though scientists have known for many years that blood can transmit mad cow type diseases.
This is why if you try to donate your blood to the Red Cross, you will be rejected if you spent significant time in Britain during the height of its mad cow epidemic. Britain is afraid that humans with mad cow disease may have contaminated the British blood supply, and they do not use its own blood plasma since as yet no test can adequately screen blood for mad cow disease.
Even if Canada does turn out to be the source of America's first case of mad cow disease, numerous questions remain:

* How many other infected cows have crossed our porous borders and been processed into human and animal food?

* Why are America's slaughterhouse regulations so lax that a visibly sick cow was sent into the human food chain weeks before tests came back with the mad cow findings?

* Where did the infected byproduct feed that this animal ate come from, and how many thousands of other animals have eaten similar feed?

And of course, no sick "downer" cows, barely able to move, should be fed to any human.

These are the type of animals most likely to be infected with mad cow and other ailments - although mad cows can also seem completely healthy at the time of slaughter, which is why testing all animals must be the goal.

The feed rules that the United States must adopt can be summarized this way: You might not be a vegetarian, but the animals you eat must be.

But that isn't going to happen under the Reign of King George Cowpuncher:

The USDA works tirelessly to protect beef industry profits at the expense of public health

What's obvious to every thinking person who has paid attention to this issue is that the USDA is acting as a beef marketing branch of the U.S. government, not as an agency tasked with protecting the American public. In fact, Lisa Harrison, the spokeswoman for the Agriculture Secretary, was formerly the director of public relations for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association! It's a clear case of a severe conflict of interest, but it's not at all uncommon. A tremendous number of employees at the USDA and even the FDA come straight from the industries these agencies are supposed to regulate. That's just one of the many reasons why both the USDA and FDA fail so miserably at doing their jobs (protecting the public) while succeeding so strongly in promoting the economic interests of their respective industries.
The USDA is protecting the profits of industry, not public health. And chances are, some American consumers are going to pay the price for it. My best advice: stop eating cow flesh.

I have to add my endorsement to this warning.

I know it's hard to change your eating habits, especially when those hamburger commercials make you forget the latest bovine spongiform encephalitis warnings with their luscious and lascivious subliminal advertising techniques. You know as well as I do that these techniques work very well, or else Al Gore would be President.

But it is impossible to cure BSE or the human diseases it causes. Which would you rather deal with?

You will be the one to deal with this dilemma, for as I point out above, you are of concern to Bu$hCo and their contributors only to the extent that you provide profits. You and your health are of no concern whatsoever.

Copyrighted source material contained in this article is presented under the provisions of Fair Use.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.

theleftcoaster.com