Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (20539)	6/20/2005 7:14:01 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"I will not bore you with advanced logic. The right to free speech is NEVER limited. The restriction on free speech (in order to conform to the principle that EVERY individual has that right) has restrictions. The speech and the RIGHT are not the same. "Free speech" must be understood in the conglomerate in order that rights DO remain inviolate. Your right to free speech may not violate my inalienable rights. Otherwise the concept and principle would be feckless." Thanks for sparing me the "advanced logic" form of your argument. I'm not even sure what your point is any more as so much of what the last two posts argue is plainly self-contradictory. Absolute and inviolable, yet limited and restricted, but not limited, only "interpreted and constrained", not by society, just "everybody capable of rational thought", but "the decision of society will carry". OK, whatever you say. Ciao.