Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8524)	6/21/2005 12:20:01 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

ahem, you just threatened to sue me in CA Also, what about the CA attorney cease and desist or else letter? You had a company insider who also happens to be an attorney who resides in CA send me the cease and desist or else letter. That's threatening to sue me in CA. You also posted it on the boards that you'll sue me in CA if necessary. This is what the lawsuit was like, round and round, tons of bull flying. Every time she'd file a motion it'd be literally an inch thick. She'd take one law and twist it so that it was unrecognizable then try to apply it to some completely different legal argument. A few times I had no idea what she was suing for. She also sued me for securities fraud. She basically stated that I caused the share price to go down and she lost money. Then she said I caused her business to fail so she was forced to sell shares for less than the original value of the shares she got in exchange for promotion. They were restricted and locked up. She couldn't have sold sooner. In all honesty if she'd held onto the shares the price would have just gone MUCH lower. Then she stated that she listened to my stock "advice" and sold and lost money. If she did that, I would have saved her money. She didn't make any sense, still doesn't.