SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (686373)6/21/2005 12:30:58 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Writing in the San Francisco Chronicle, historian Robert McElvaine offers what may be the worst historical analogy ever. The Iraq war, he argues, is not another Vietnam but another Civil War. And that's a bad thing. He rejects the idea that liberating Iraq is analogous to the civil rights movement of the 20th century:

Even if the avowed objectives of the outsiders [in Mississippi] in 1964 and today were similar, the means they employed to try to achieve those ends were radically different. That difference points up the wrongheadedness of the Bush policy in Iraq. The outsiders, joined by many blacks and a few whites in Mississippi, sought to bring freedom and democracy to this state peacefully.

The use of military force to improve the situation of African Americans had been tried a century before, in the 1860s. The result was more than a half million people killed. Slavery ended, but freedom and democracy lasted only during the period of military occupation that followed the Civil War. Little more than a decade after the end of that terrible war, the occupying forces were gone, and the undemocratic elements had been restored to their dominance and oppression.

This is mostly true, but the North's chief aim in the Civil War was not to improve the situation of Southern blacks. It was to preserve the Union, and in that it succeeded, albeit at enormous cost.

What would have happened in the 20th century if the North had lost the war, or had decided not to wage it and let the Confederate States of America have its independence? There's no way of knowing for sure, but we do know that achieving full equality for blacks involved strong actions by all three branches of the federal government, over the vigorous and sometimes violent objections of Southern politicians.

President Truman's order desegregating the military, Brown v. Board of Education, the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would have had no force in the South if the South were not still part of the United States. It's hard to deny, then, that preservation of the Union via the Civil War was a necessary condition for black equality, even if the latter came about a century late.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (686373)6/21/2005 12:31:31 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Blogger Duncan "Atrios" Black prints a hilarious letter from Rep. John Conyers to the Washington Post, complaining about Dana Milbank's treatment of Conyers's make-believe impeachment hearing. The best bit:

In a typically derisive and uninformed passage, Milbank makes much of other lawmakers calling me "Mr. Chairman" and says I liked it so much that I used "chairmanly phrases." Milbank may not know that I was the Chairman of the House Government Operations Committee from 1988 to 1994. By protocol and tradition in the House, once you have been a Chairman you are always referred to as such. Thus, there was nothing unusual about my being referred to as Mr. Chairman.

Sometimes the best way to respond when your dignity is affronted is simply to keep silent. Here Conyers succeeds only in diminishing his dignity further. On a more substantive note, Conyers distances himself from anti-Semitic comments one of his "witnesses" made:

I do not agree with, support, or condone any comments asserting Israeli control over U.S. policy, and I find any allegation that Israel is trying to dominate the world or had anything to do with the September 11 tragedy disgusting and offensive.

The Associated Press reports that Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean issued a statement disavowing anti-Semitic literature Democratic activists had been distributing in conjunction with the hearing. Well, it's reassuring to know that something is beyond the pale even for Howard Dean.

But Conyers can't get off so easy. After all, he invited Ray McGovern, the "witness" whose statements Conyers claims he doesn't "condone," to "testify" at his "hearing." As blogger Richard Baehr notes, "McGovern's views are well known (that is why he was invited by Conyers, presumably), and the activists were handing out their anti-Semitic literature openly to everyone in sight in the DNC office."



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (686373)6/21/2005 12:50:08 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Killen Guilty of Manslaughter in '64 Civil Rights Killings
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
PHILADELPHIA, Miss. -- An 80-year-old former Ku Klux Klansman was convicted of manslaughter Tuesday in the 1964 slayings of three civil rights workers -- exactly 41 years after they disappeared.

The jury of nine whites and three blacks reached the verdict on their second day of deliberations, rejecting murder charges against Edgar Ray Killen.

Killen showed no emotion as the verdict was read. He was comforted by his wife as he said in his wheelchair. He was wearing an oxygen tube. Heavily armed police a barrier outside a side door to the courthouse and jurors were loaded into two waiting vans and driven away.

The verdict was 41 years to the date after James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner were ambushed, beaten, and shot.

Prosecutors had asked the jury to send a message to the rest of the world that Mississippi has changed and is committed to bringing to justice those who killed to preserve segregation in the 1960s. They said the evidence was clear that Killen organized the attack on the three victims.

Earlier:

By SHADI RAHIMI

A Mississippi jury resumed deliberations today in the trial of Edgar Ray Killen, on the 41st anniversary of the three murders that Mr. Killen, a former Ku Klux Klansman, is accused of orchestrating.

The jury was split 6-6 late Monday after nearly three hours of deliberating the fate of Mr. Killen, an ailing sawmill operator who is charged with masterminding the killings of three voter registration workers in 1964. Jurors were sent back to a hotel and sequestered for the night after the judge, Marcus Gordon, checked their progress.The defense argued Monday in closing statements that the 41-year-old case should never have been brought against Mr. Killen, who is now 80. A defense lawyer, James McIntyre, conceded that Mr. Killen was once a Klan member but argued, "He's not charged with being a member of the Klan, he's charged with murder."

"If you vote your conscience you are voting not guilty," Mr. McIntyre told the jurors. "There is a reasonable doubt."

In his rebuttal, the district attorney, Mark Duncan, said that the evidence that Mr. Killen was culpable in the killings is "absolutely overwhelming."

"There is only one question left," Mr. Duncan said. "Is a Neshoba County jury going to tell the rest of the world that we're not going to let Edgar Ray Killen get away with murder? Not one day more."

Mr. Killen, the first to face state murder charges in the case, could be sentenced to life in prison if convicted of murder. He did not testify at the trial, which began last Wednesday, and looked down or straight ahead as he listened to the lawyers deliver their closing statements to the jury.

On the night they disappeared, the three victims, all in their 20's, had been helping to register black voters during the "Freedom Summer" of 1964 and were investigating a church in Philadelphia, Miss., that had been burned by the Ku Klux Klan.

The victims, James Earl Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman, were initially taken into custody on speeding charges. Upon their release from jail, their car was pursued by Klansmen. They were shot dead and later found buried in an earthen dam. Their 44-day disappearance thrust the Jim Crow code of segregation in the South into the national spotlight and helped to spearhead passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Of the 18 men tried a year later on federal civil rights charges, 7 were convicted by the all-white jury. Mr. Killen was freed when the jury deadlocked 11 to 1 in favor of conviction, after a holdout juror said she could not convict a preacher.

Eight of the defendants are still alive. The men who were convicted were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 3 years to 10 years, although none served more than 6 years. The case gained renewed international attention when it was dramatized in the 1988 movie "Mississippi Burning."

Mr. Killen, who is being tried by the State of Mississippi on three counts of murder, has been free on bail and uses a wheelchair because of arthritis that worsened after he broke his legs in a tree-cutting accident in March.

Prosecutors sought to convince the jurors - nine whites and three blacks - that although Mr. Killen was not present during the killings, he had organized groups of men and planned what they would do, including, according to testimony, telling the men where to go and instructing someone to buy gloves for the men to wear during the crime.

Jim Hood, the state attorney general who is helping Mr. Duncan prosecute the case, said during closing arguments, "When this so-called preacher made instructions and gave the word, people believed in him."

The final witness for the defense was a former mayor of the rural town of Philadelphia, Harlan Majure, who testified before a packed courtroom today that the Ku Klux Klan was a "peaceful organization that "did a lot of good up here."