Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (20560)	6/21/2005 9:17:42 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

The short answer was yes. No body would read my long answer so I'll leave it at that for now. BTW I had quite a discussion about self-evidence with solon a while back. Either we just view self-evidence differently or he doesn't accept the term as valid at all; I'm not sure at this point.

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (20560)	6/22/2005 12:11:07 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

LOL! I've been generous enough with you, I think! And I have respected your responses and your version of being rational! But we all have a bias, I think. If you think you can explain anything to Greg or e which will overwhelm HIS fanatical belief system...be my guest! As to your own beliefs...I will not disparage them. I presented my own opinion. And I truly believe I proved it via my version of rationality. If you are unable or unwilling to engage Greg or e in his disputatious query, then it is probably best to state it directly to him--without hiding behind my gentle comments toward yourself. He asked you a question. You surely did not answer it, but rather you engaged in a non-response. Your version of rationality, I guess...