Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Slagle who wrote (65325)	6/21/2005 11:15:24 PM
From: shades	Respond to of 74559

heck, why didn't HE catch it back it April? He never posted it on his "buy" lists. I don't think Phil's method really works with the type of stocks he recommends. Exactly, certainly he had seen it, and if his "method" worked he would have invested - it is like you said a few months back and repeated here again - it's no good for what I am trying to do - his "method" is more magic than science. Sad to say but a guy calling himself the WIZARD (mark mandel) who claims to have a crystal ball seems to have the most science behind his stock picks. I have tried watching bloomberg TV, it is so dry, I literally have fallen asleep 2 times in the past 2 months watching it. When I can't sleep I turn it on and voila, I am out in no time. Slagle I have made more listening at the folks on diehards.org with the vangaurd energy fund with almost ZERO time invested than I have trying to listen at all the noise coming from CNBC and stock gurus and individual stock picks. I am really beginning to wonder after many years investing if the EMH people don't really have it right. I read so many academic papers to the positive. I will research more.