SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (121838)6/24/2005 12:37:33 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793888
 
Didn't ignore the parts you mention, but you can't read out of the opinion the bits I cited, either, no more than you can ignore footnote 4 in the Carolene Products case either.

Plug Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld into a Lexis search and you'll see what the case has come to stand for.

Or, as my Con Law professor used to say, "it may be dicta, but it's great dicta."



To: D. Long who wrote (121838)6/24/2005 1:47:12 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793888
 
See also Rasul v. Bush, 124 S. Ct. 2686 (2005); In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases, 355 F. Supp. 2d 443; (DDC 2005); and the Moussaoui case. Yes, terrorists get due process, even enemy combatants.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News