Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (121979)	6/24/2005 1:33:04 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793908

You've already conceded my sole, narrow argument, which is that the detainees cannot be held indefinitely, but are entitled to a review and that the review will entail fundamental due process. Whether there is ultimately access to US courts for habeas corpus review of the Combat Status Review Tribunal would be an interesting argument. The argument about mint tea and so forth is just silly, as is the "full panoply" argument. (As was the Johnnie Cochran argument but at least Kholt is not a lawyer.)