SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/24/2005 6:38:31 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 93284
 
Rove's remarks clearly show true Bushie dark dementia.
Dean's comments were rude but at least true.
Durbins were just an exaggeration. Abu Graib would have made Hitler proud.

Rove's were 100% untrue and also exploited the 9-11 victims for political "gain". And the White House actually backed him up on them. Amazing dishonesty and arrogance.

Bushies are dangerous demented people. They won't be thrown out of power easily. They have to be dragged, kicking and screaming, and then be held accountable.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/25/2005 11:19:29 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
You must understand --It's a ONE-WAY world for leftwingers.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/25/2005 11:23:47 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
granddaddylonglegs.blogspot.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/25/2005 11:36:15 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 93284
 
I wonder if Vince Foster was ever "threatened" by this guy.

Hillary's Detective Charged with Intimidation
NewsMax ^ | 6/25/05 | Limbacher

A top Los Angeles private detective who helped Hillary Clinton quash her husband's "bimbo eruptions" in 1992 has been charged with making criminal threats and with conspiracy to commit a crime.

Prosecutors say that Anthony Pellicano - know as the "Private Eye to the Stars" - hired a second man to threaten Los Angeles Times reporter Anita Busch, and to "cause her to fear for her life."

Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley announced the charges against Pellicano last Friday, in a complaint that alleges that the private detective's co-conspirator threatened Busch "by placing a dead fish with a rose in its mouth on the windshield of her car. He made a hole in the windshield with the intent to make it appear like a bullet hole. He also placed a sign with the word 'stop' on the windshield."

In 1992, the Clintons recruited Pellicano to contact some women on a list of 19 so-called "bimbo eruptions" that had been leaked to the press. Some of the women later complained to then-Bush 41 campaign director Mary Matalin that they had been threatened.

Matalin, now a senior White House advisor, detailed the episode when she hosted a Washington, D.C. talk radio show in 1997, explaining: "I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women."

In 1998, the New York Post reported that Pellicano helped with damage control in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, unearthing Monica's old boyfriend, Andy Blieler. Blieler told reporters that Monica told him she wanted to go to Washington to earn her "presidential kneepads."

Pellicano has told reporters that he prefers to carry a baseball bat, not a gun, explaining to the Los Angeles Times: "I only use intimidation and fear when I absolutely have to." After her brush with the Clinton P.I.'s hardball tactics, Anita Busch retired from journalism.

Pelicano is currently serving a 30-month jail sentence for possession of hand grenades and plastic explosives, which were discovered during a Nov. 2003 search of his Sunset Blvd. office by police investigating the Busch case.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/25/2005 5:45:38 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 93284
 
A much abbreviated list of traitors in our midst:

Ward Churchill
George Soros
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Robert Byrd
Richard Durbin
Howard Dean
Barbara Boxer
Ted Kennedy
Nancy Pelosi
Maxine Waters
Barney Frank
David Bonior
Charles Rangel
Patrick Leahy
John Conyers
Chaka Fattah
Jamie Gorelick
David Fenton
Peter Lewis
Noam Chomsky
John Walker
Thomas Frank
Maureen Dowd
Eleanor Clift
Jeremy Glick
Sean Penn
Jeanine Garofalo
Al Franken
Ted Turner
Michael Moore
Martin Sheen
Alec Baldwin
Barbra Streisand



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/25/2005 5:47:13 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
One has to wonder whether the screaming American critics of our involvement in Iraq (the Deans, Kennedys, Durbins and their wretched ilk) are simply anti-American (which is fairly conclusive from much of their non-Iraq rhetoric), or whether they also -- even worse -- genuinely support the goals of Baathism or jihadism.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/26/2005 12:01:20 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
Nutty 9/11 art nixed

No U.S. bashing at WTC, Pataki vows

By JOE MAHONEY and DOUGLAS FEIDEN
NY DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS


Gov. Pataki blasted America-bashing art like that featured by Drawing Center.

Gov. Pataki drew a line in the sand yesterday, declaring he will tolerate no America-bashing on the sacred soil of Ground Zero.
Hours after the Daily News disclosed that a museum set to rise on the site had displayed kooky and anti-American art, the governor said there can be no place where nearly 3,000 innocents died for an institution that attacks the United States and the heroes of 9/11.

His voice rising and his resolve steely as he compared the World Trade Center tract to the bloody beaches of Normandy and the black waters of Pearl Harbor, Pataki vowed:

"We will not tolerate anything on that site that denigrates America, denigrates New York or freedom or denigrates the sacrifice and courage that the heroes showed on Sept. 11."

He added, "The Daily News did a good service by pointing out some of these things. We do not want that at Ground Zero; I do not want that at Ground Zero and to the extent that I have the power, it's not going to happen."

At issue are two controversial cultural groups that were picked to occupy a major building at the heart of the site - and have enraged 9/11 family members who say their murdered loved ones are being disrespected.

The larger museum, the International Freedom Center, has sparked fears it will focus on acts of U.S. wrongdoing, like slavery and treatment of American Indians, while the Drawing Center, now based in SoHo, was exposed in The News as displaying graphic and vulgar art attacking America's war on terror.

"Sure, there can be debate," Pataki said when asked if his tough stance jeopardized free-speech rights. "But I don't want that debate to be occurring at Ground Zero."

Acting after a protest from family members - and word the Drawing Center had displayed art linking President Bush to Osama Bin Laden and portraying terror suspects as victims of American torture - the governor laid down the law to the Lower Manhattan Development Corp.: "Contact the cultural institutions on the memorial site. . . and get from them an absolute guarantee that as they proceed, it will be with total respect for the sanctity of that site." This was followed by a simple, stark threat: "I'm hopeful they are able to do that, and if not, then they shouldn't be there."

Pataki twice repeated his threat, saying the Freedom and Drawing Centers must respect sacred ground - or else.

"Period. Otherwise they won't be there," he said.

Aides said the governor remained committed to a cultural component and was hopeful the museums would meet his demand to guarantee the sanctity of the site.

Tom Bernstein, the Freedom Center's chairman, pledged in a statement to preserve that sanctity. The center "must, and will, honor humanity's march toward freedom and highlight America's role as a beacon for freedom throughout the world."

The Drawing Center released a statement saying it would work with the state to resolve the "inevitable tensions" between "remembrance and cultural activity."

Originally published on June 25, 2005





To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/27/2005 9:53:04 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
unable to verify the existence of 43 people she named in her columns
........................................................
Bee publishes results of Griego Erwin probe
[Erwin earned the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service Journalism in 1985 with the LA Times. ]

By Dorothy Korber and John Hill -- Bee Staff Writers
Published 2:15 am PDT Sunday, June 26, 2005
To our readers:
When Diana Griego Erwin resigned last month amid controversy, I promised you a deeper review of her work as a Bee columnist.
In the accompanying story, we report the results of our investigation. The findings are troubling: We have been unable to verify the existence of 43 people she named in her columns. This doesn't prove these people don't exist, but despite extensive research we have been unable to find them.

We know that credibility with our readers is at the heart of what we do. That's why we put this investigation through two lenses: a management team and a team of award-winning investigative reporters.

Recent ethical lapses at several newsrooms around the country spurred us to strengthen our editing standards and to work to elevate our performance. The questions that led to the investigation of Griego Erwin's columns grew out of that process.

But meeting these standards -and your expectations of us - requires constant vigilance. And we hope you will let us know in the future if you feel we have failed you.

I'm sorry our work with Diana Griego Erwin didn't meet our expectations or yours. Our recent lessons have been painful, but you have my word that we are committed to improving. Nothing means more to us than your trust and readership.

- Rick Rodriguez, executive editor

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An internal investigation into the published work of former Bee columnist Diana Griego Erwin found 43 cases in which individuals named by the writer could not be authenticated as real people.
Griego Erwin, whose column ran three days a week on The Bee's Metro page, resigned May 11 after she failed to substantiate details from several recent columns. She has denied fabricating any information.

The Bee investigation - conducted by reporters, editors and researchers - initially focused on Griego Erwin's work during the previous 16 months.

From Jan. 1, 2004, until her final column on April 26, Griego Erwin wrote 171 columns. The Bee's investigation found 30 names in 27 separate columns that could not be verified during that time period. The people could not be found in voter registration rolls, property records, telephone books, identity databases or through scores of phone calls.

In light of those findings, the review expanded to include a sampling of columns spanning her 12-year tenure with the newspaper, and 13 additional cases in another 10 columns were found.

Many of the columns in question fit a template: essays, often with a surprising O. Henry twist, about a singular person who faces a challenge and surmounts it. Their stories frequently reflect a theme taken from current headlines - wildfires, for example, or prison brutality, school shootings, murderous road rage or a high-profile trial.

Some are people with last names so unusual they don't appear anywhere in the United States. For example, a column that ran May 13, 1997, described Victor Budriyev, a Russian immigrant who lost his sweetheart to the bright lights of Los Angeles. The Bee could find no Victor Budriyev in the United States, nor a single citation for "Budriyev" in all of the massive Google search engine.

Some don't show up where they should: Donald Burton, a "barber" who is not on the state's list of licensed barbers. Margaret Brown, a "retired teacher" who is not on the rolls of the teachers retirement system. Others are described as longtime homeowners whose names do not appear on property records for their communities.

These are not anonymous sources; they all have names. And Griego Erwin often provided intimate details about the individuals and their lives, from the creases in their faces to the names of their pets.

"These are people we should have been able to find," said Bee Executive Editor Rick Rodriguez. "It kills us that we can't. We still hope they will turn up, but we're presenting the facts as we found them. Obviously, we feel strongly that we should have been able to find these individuals."

In the year preceding the inquiry, The Bee had significantly tightened its policy on use of anonymous sources in stories, part of a nationwide trend to ensure fairness and credibility in newspaper reporting.

"We had been talking about stricter standards for anonymous sources in news stories," Rodriguez said. "So we asked ourselves: Are we giving the columnists too much leeway?"

In that spirit, a red flag went up when an editor asked Griego Erwin a routine question on April 23: What was the name of the tavern where she interviewed Anthony Romero, the bartender who was a focal point of the column?

Griego Erwin said she couldn't remember, although the interview ostensibly took place the evening before.

"Two weeks later, when we still didn't have the answer to that question, it raised more questions," Rodriguez said.

Eventually, Griego Erwin identified a bar she thought might have been the place. However, that bar did not employ an Anthony Romero.

At the time of her resignation, Griego Erwin denied doing anything wrong. She said she was resigning for personal reasons and maintained that ultimately her sources would be proved authentic. In the weeks since, she has provided the newspaper with no further information.

Griego Erwin was not asked to participate in the broader review of her work that occurred after her resignation. She declined to be interviewed for this article, writing June 9 in an e-mail: "The story has been told and I am sad that The Bee continues to pursue this."

She took issue with the continued scrutiny, saying it is undeserved, and then concluded: "Surely there are more important stories out there than another about me. I know there are. Even now, I come across them every day."

Shortly before she quit, Bee editors asked her to supply contact information for people mentioned in four recent columns: Audrey Hellund, from a column decrying senseless violence; Elsie Chau, described as a downtown homeowner who befriended a homeless woman; Margaret Brown, quoted in a column about racial inequities; and Mary Magorki, featured in a column promoting self-defense for women.

Rodriguez said the people chosen should not have been difficult for her to track down, particularly because Griego Erwin appeared to have interviewed two of the subjects in their homes.

When she was unable to provide contact information for any of the four, editors became alarmed and broadened the inquiry. (The Bee's public editor printed the four names in his May 22 column, and none has come forward.)

Bee City Editor Stuart Drown did the initial review of the 171 columns. He started by eliminating people who were well known. For others, he checked Northern California phone listings - calling anyone with a similar name - and followed clues from the columns, contacting trailer parks, adoption agencies, bars, restaurants and numerous workplaces to try to find the people named.

Drown excluded unnamed sources from the review, because they would be impossible to check without Griego Erwin's cooperation.

He turned over the names of those who could not be found to the newspaper's director of editorial research, Pete Basofin.

Basofin ran them through California People Finder and Accurint, databases that provide addresses and phone numbers going back years. He also searched county property records, public documents such as court records, the newspaper's archives, and old city directories in The Bee's editorial research department.

In the end, 30 names still could not be confirmed, an outcome Basofin found surprising.

Given the reach of modern databases, "It's unusual when we can't find any trace of someone, particularly homeowners and people who vote," he said.

As a test of the newspaper's research system, editors did a random check of the work of three other Bee columnists. Editors checked out names from 36 columns written by Anita Creamer, R.E. Graswich and Bob Sylva. Every name in every column was easily verified.

During newsroom meetings called to address the Griego Erwin situation, some Bee staff members suggested investigative reporters be assigned to the inquiry as a further check. In response, Rodriguez assigned two reporters, asking them to examine Drown's findings and pursue the inquiry further.

They created a computer spreadsheet with details and characteristics from the problematic columns. From this grid, patterns emerged that the two reporters used to pinpoint earlier columns that needed to be reviewed.

Along with the whimsical nature of many of the columns in question, the reporters noted that vital identifiers often were missing: Though the person is named, no hometown is given, or no occupation, or the name is so common it defies pinning down.

Sometimes the site of the interview is oddly generic: "a senior center" with no name or location. Similarly, "a neighborhood coffeehouse" or a home "in a dip in a road in an older area of the county."

That last is from a column about Carrie Escarta that ran Sept. 26, 2004.

The Escarta column provides small details that run like threads through Griego Erwin's work: people discover hidden notes or keep poetry journals or read piles of books.

Escarta's neighborhood isn't mentioned. She is given no age or occupation. The elderly woman who previously owned the home - and left the secret notes and journals - is not named, nor the son who apparently forced her to move.

The column indicates Escarta had bought the house a few years before. But the Sacramento County recorder's database of deeds shows no one named Escarta buying a house in the past 15 years. Furthermore, the surname "Escarta" does not exist anywhere in California - or the nation - in any of The Bee's resources.

On Oct. 19, three weeks after the Escarta column, Griego Erwin wrote about 89-year-old Mary Carter, who was living "in a two-room cabin in the foothills a few miles outside of Georgetown," a town of about 960. The columnist said the woman lived alone - "so simply that the neighbors worry" - with her walls of books, poetry journals and two lolling cats.

No such woman can be found in El Dorado County property records, voter registration files, or The Bee's identity databases. In a phone interview, Alice Funk, a 50-year Georgetown resident and member of the Georgetown Seniors Club, interrupted her Yahtzee game to say she'd never heard of a Mary Carter, "and I think I would have if she lived around here."

Even so, the lack of data does not prove conclusively that this person was fabricated. She may have slipped through the cracks. But, as with the others, The Bee could not verify her existence.

Three weeks ago, The Bee widened the investigation to check columns going back to Griego Erwin's arrival at the newspaper in 1993. Though these subjects are harder to verify - they may have died or moved away - the newspaper does have access to early city directories and older electronic records. Through these sources, the reporters unearthed several cases that fit the pattern of other problem columns and could not be authenticated.

How could Griego Erwin's work have escaped editorial scrutiny for so long? Rodriguez says there are several reasons, beginning with her elevated status as a columnist and her journalistic credentials.

At age 25, Griego Erwin worked on a project that won the 1986 Pulitzer Prize for public service for the Denver Post. She has received other prestigious national awards as well, including a George Polk award and the 1990 commentary prize from the American Society of Newspaper Editors.

"With a high-profile columnist, especially with the credentials present in this case, it is not first nature or even second nature to ask them if the person they're writing about actually exists," Rodriguez said. "Columnists are given more latitude in their writing style. It's more personalized. They share their voice and their views with the community."

The detailed descriptions that flowed through the narratives also lent a sense of credibility, he added.

"As an editor, when you get that many details from a writer, you're less likely to question the authenticity," Rodriguez said. "She even described the way the cat's tail was curling."

Another factor came into play. Unlike news stories, columns usually are not illustrated with photographs of the subject. That may change, according to Rodriguez.

One thing already has changed, he said.

"Our editors are asking tougher questions of our reporters," said Rodriguez. "I hope that the reporters will take it upon themselves to understand that the public trust has been violated here and so they will readily provide the information."

The Bee's investigation comes against a backdrop of recent journalism scandals. In the last two years, USA Today, the Los Angeles Times and the Detroit Free Press have grappled with ethical breaches involving fabrications or plagiarism.

Most recently, Newsweek retracted a report, based on an anonymous source, that guards at the U.S. military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, had flushed a Quran down a toilet.

This growing list erodes public trust in journalists, said Barbara O'Connor, a communications professor who heads the Institute for the Study of Politics and Media at California State University, Sacramento.

"There has been some increase in the number of these cases, but I don't think it's a great increase," she said. "It's just so much easier to ferret them out these days. With communications technology, it's easier for journalists to gather information - but it also makes it easier for their editors to find plagiarists or to check out the identity of folks in stories."

Although such cases have emerged across the country, Rodriguez believes they are not the norm.

"I don't think it is commonplace at all," he said. "Certainly not here. But there are 300 people working, gathering news for the paper. Can we say this will never happen again at The Bee? No. Nothing in life is guaranteed. All we can guarantee is we'll try harder."



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/27/2005 10:26:20 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Tsunami aid 'went to the richest'
BBC News ^ | 06/25/05

Thousands in Aceh have not been able to move out of camps
Six months after the Asian tsunami, a leading international charity says the poorest victims have benefited the least from the massive relief effort.
A survey by Oxfam found that aid had tended to go to businesses and landowners, exacerbating the divide between rich and poor.

The poor were likely to spend much longer in refugee camps where it is harder to find work or rebuild lives.

Oxfam has called for aid to go to the poorest and most marginalised.

They must not be left out of reconstruction efforts, the charity said.

HAVE YOUR SAY
There is a great deal of room for governments and aid agencies to work closer together

J. Mehta, UK

Send us your comments

The tsunami in the Indian Ocean on 26 December killed at least 200,000 people in countries as far apart as Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka and Somalia.

David Loyn, the BBC's developing world correspondent, says it is perhaps not surprising that the poorest suffered the most from the disaster itself.

Living in frail shelter, on marginal land, they were literally swept away by the waves, and the survivors among the poorest communities had less access to medical help than richer people did.

Intolerable gaps

The survey points to the marginalisation of dalits - outcasts in India - and specific problems in Sri Lanka where aid has gone to businesses and landowners rather than the landless.



Identifying victims 'to take months'
This poverty gap is worst in Aceh, the Indonesian province which was the most badly affected area, already impoverished by conflict before the tsunami hit.

Half a million survivors were homeless.

Yet the wealthier among them have already been able to move out of temporary camps.

Another survey by a group of British academics monitoring the delivery of aid has found that, six months on, there is little evidence of permanent accommodation being built for most people.

It says starkly that these failures would not be tolerated after a disaster in the developed world.

All aid agencies, as well as regional governments must share some blame for this failure, our correspondent adds.

The unprecedented international response to the tragedy means that the immediate humanitarian demands could be fully funded.

Failure to deliver assistance effectively to the poorest, or to plan properly for the future, reveals fundamental weaknesses in the system.




To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34784)6/27/2005 11:58:23 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
John Kline: Gitmo patriots deserve our respect
Star Tribune. June 27, 2005
John Kline, Congressman from represents Minnesota's Second Congressional District.

On Tuesday, Sen. Dick Durbin finally apologized on the floor of the U.S. Senate for his odious mischaracterization of our U.S. military personnel serving at Guantanamo Bay. His apology came in response to the wake-up call from a chorus of critics who highlighted the offense and disgrace of his remarks. Unfortunately, the Star Tribune remains asleep.
In a recent editorial, the Star Tribune characterized as "spot on" Durbin's comparison of U.S. military personnel conduct toward detainees at Guantanamo Bay to the genocide and atrocities committed by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, and Pol Pot.
Your commendation of statements which so clearly dishonor our servicemen and women and diminish the true suffering of the millions of victims of those regimes of terror is shocking. Your description of organizations and individuals such as the Anti-Defamation League and Democratic Chicago Major Richard Daley as an "orchestrated right-wing smear effort" is equally surprising.
I agree our focus should be on the "truth Americans need to hear." Let us consider just a few notable truths.
Truth: Since Sept. 11, 2001, more than 70,000 detainees have been captured in Afghanistan and Iraq. The vast majority have been released. Of those individuals who remain, approximately 800 suspected Al-Qaida or Taliban terrorist trainers, bombmakers, terrorist financiers and would-be suicide bombers have been sent to Guantanamo Bay. Already 235 of these individuals have been released or transferred, and an additional 61 await release or transfer.
Truth: The detainees at Guantanamo Bay are not being held arbitrarily. Each of the detainees has received a tribunal review consistent with Supreme Court rulings. At least once per year, the detainees receive an additional review by an administrative review board, based on threat, for possible release.
Truth: Officials at Guantanamo have provided unprecedented access and transparency since 2002. The International Committee of the Red Cross has been granted 24/7 access to the facility. More than 1,000 national and international journalists have made over 400 visits to Guantanamo.
Truth: A captured Al-Qaida training manual (the Manchester Document) instructs members to allege abuse and torture if captured.
Truth: Intelligence gained at Guantanamo Bay has prevented terrorist attacks and saved American lives. Through questioning at Guantatamo bay, U.S. military personnel have learned a great deal about the organizational structure of Al-Qaida and other terrorist groups; the extent of terrorist presence in the United States, Europe and the Middle East; methods of terrorist recruitment; and how legitimate financial activities have been used to hide terrorist operations.
In light of these truths, it is curious that allegations of abuse by well-trained enemy combatants should be more readily accepted than the word of our men and women in uniform who serve -- and have previously served -- our country at Guantanamo.
These patriots deserve our respect and gratitude. They are doing an excellent job of uncovering truths which will help keep America safe -- and this is the truth Americans need to hear.
John Kline, a Republican, represents Minnesota's Second Congressional District.