SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (51057)6/24/2005 6:29:28 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Nobody "slaughtered" any Koresh nuts. Koresh got them all killed by barricading them in a tinderbox building surrounded by highly flammable materials. All the feds did was shoot in a tear gas grenade designed to force them to surrender peacefully.

You and your type owe big apologies to our hard-working federal officers. Stand in their shoes for awhile when they have to root out a wacko rightwing armageddon cult. Koresh was dangerous. Insane. Had no right or reason to be amassing illegal arsenals. We don't need armageddon nuts in this country. They are just as dangerous as the Islamic kind. As McVeigh proved.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (51057)6/25/2005 1:12:46 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Asymmetry in the slurs

By Victor Davis Hanson
June 25, 2005

Sen. Dick Durbin, Illinois Democrat, was not alone in recently comparing American behavior at Guantanamo Bay to that of ,"Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime -- Pol Pot or others -- that had no concern for human beings."
Tarring Bush and Co. with Hitlerian imagery has become a debased parlor game. Politicians and other public figures toss about these charged references, expecting to create a buzz and assuming their audience is as uninformed as they are.
Rep. Charles Rangel, New York Democrat, cited the Holocaust to blast American policy in Iraq: "This is just as bad as the 6 million Jews being killed." In his upside-down world, the mass murderer is the moral equivalent of those who stop him. Before Mr. Rangel, Sen. Robert Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, evoked Nazi Germany to warn about the Bush administration.
An official of the Red Crosslectured that American guards at Guantanamo were "no better than and no different than the Nazi concentration camp guards." Left unsaid was the logical sick corollary: If the perpetrators of the Holocaust were really no worse than American guards at Guantanamo, then, as is the case at Guantanamo where not one death has been reported, did no one really perish at Belsen or Treblinka, either?
And these people aren't the only ones to stoop to play this game. There's also been NAACP Chairman Julian Bond ,("The American flag and the Confederate swastika"), former Ohio Sen. JohnGlenn, ("It's the old Hitler business"), Garrison Keillor, ("Brownshirts in pinstripes"), Linda Ronstadt ("A new bunch of Hitlers") and Al Gore ("Digital Brownshirts").
Why suddenly does Adolf Hitler pop up everywhere when the Nazis have absolutely no relation with a democratic United States or a humane military?
Time Magazine recently reported that when Mohammed al-Qahtani, suspected 20th hijacker of September 11, 2001, was in distress, he was given a CAT scan and put on a heart monitor. A radiologist was flown to Cuba for consultation.
In contrast, is Mr. Durbin aware the Nazis laid railroad tracks to the very gates of Auschwitz to facilitate its engine of mass death, an industry that would take more than 6 million people? Or can he grasp the idea of 25 million perishing in the gulag -- the population of Durbin's Illinois being exterminated twice?
Note the escalating frustration behind these outbursts. Although an occasional conservative like Sen. Rick Santorum, Pennsylvania Republican, has stooped to Hitlerian slander, most offenders, such as Michael Moore (comparing the Patriot Act to "Mein Kampf") or George Soros (saying Mr. Bush reminded him of "the Germans"), are on the left, furious over their inability to affect events.
Since September 11, we have had midterm and national elections, both referenda on the so-called war against terror. Those on the left have lost the majority of state legislatures, governorships, the House, the Senate, the presidency and perhaps the Supreme Court. If normal debate somehow didn't rile up the somnolent American people, why not try conjuring up the ghosts of Hitler or Josef Stalin?
There is also an asymmetry in these slurs. Few mention there really are monsters and mass killers living among us -- the North Koreans who have starved 1 million of their own, Saddam's reign of terror that may have killed as many, and, of course, the Islamicist murderers who behead, blow up and torture. "Mein Kampf" still sells well in some Arab capitals,, not in Washington or New York.
So cowards such as officials of the Red Cross and Amnesty International, and, yes, American politicians, prefer to showboat the purported misdemeanors of people who are civilized and will listen to them, rather than to condemn the horrendous felonies of those who are barbaric and will pay them no heed.
As a result, the bar is lowering. In today's climate, Alfred Knopf has already published a novel about killing the president. Charlie Brooker writing in the Guardian in London prayed for another Lee Harvey Oswald to take out George W. Bush. Comedians, New York plays and art exhibits also bandy about assassination.
Each time a public official evokes Hitler to demonize the president, the American effort in Iraq or its conservative supporters, cheap rhetorical fantasy becomes only that much closer to a nightmarish reality where the unstable, here and abroad, act on the belief America really is Hitler's Germany.
We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.

Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University and a nationally syndicated columnist



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (51057)6/27/2005 4:55:23 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Hillary Pressures Networks to Censor Klein
NewsMax ^ | Monday, June 27, 2005 | Carl Limbacher Jr

In what may be an unprecedented act of media censorship, several major TV and cable networks – including NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, Fox and CNN - have cancelled planned appearances of the author of the new, red hot book on Hillary Clinton.

Edward Klein's sizzling new biography "The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It and How Far She'll Go to Become President" has caused a storm of controversy after Sen. Clinton lashed out at it.

Her aide called the book "full of blatant and vicious fabrications contrived by someone who writes trash for cash."

Hillary's top aides and supporters have also launched a major effort to stop any discussion of the book over the TV airwaves. So far, their censorship effort has been a huge success in stopping Klein from appearing on television.

Though the celebrated author was scheduled to appear on more than a half dozen major TV network shows, all have cancelled except one, Fox's "Hannity & Colmes."

However, conservative host Sean Hannity did reveal that he was under immense pressure to cancel the program.

"I've had more political pressure than I've ever had in all my years in radio," Hannity said to Klein during a radio interview. "Do you know the number of requests I've had to cancel you and not have you on this program? I've never in the history of this program had more demands to cancel the guest."

Hannity did not identify the source of the "political pressure."

Other hosts had similar experiences. Salem Radio Network's Mike Gallagher, syndicated nationwide, said he was deluged by emails opposing Klein's scheduled appearance and demanding he drop the author. Gallagher described the campaign as "very unnatural, like an orchestrated [effort]" and not from his listeners.

But other networks, particularly television, have succumbed to the pressure.

Klein's original schedule had him appearing on several top-rated TV shows. But all of them have cancelled. Among the cancellations: "Extra;" MSNBC's "Hardball with Chris Matthews;" and CNN's Paula Zahn show.

Several shows apparently expressed a keen interest in booking Klein until pressure from the Hillary camp stopped them, among them ABC's "Good Morning America," NBC's "Today" show, and CNN's "Aaron Brown."

Still more shows were expected to sign on after the book began hitting the bestseller lists. It has done just that, but Klein's publicist's phones are still not ringing.

A source close to Klein's publisher, Sentinel, blames the censorship effort solely on the Clintons and their enormous power base.

"A number of people who have booked me on TV and radio have already cancelled," Klein told Sean Hannity last week. "And the reason they've cancelled is because the publicity machine of the Clintons is hard at work."

On the day of his only Fox News appearance, Klein's book hit the #1 spot on Amazon's coveted bestseller list, as well as top positions at online sellers like Barnes & Noble. "Truth" has also been the biggest selling book in the history of NewsMax's online store.

The liberal censorship of Klein's book has aroused the ire of Rush Limbaugh. America's number one talk show host was the first media person to condemn the spineless cravenness of the so-called mainstream media.

"It's very rare that you see the media circle the wagons to defend a politician," he noted. "You just don't see it, other than with the Clintons."

The media blackout on Klein's book can only be chalked up to a political motive. Not only is his book near the top of the bestseller lists, but it's a major discussion subject on talk radio and in the blogosphere.

Last week, Klein kicked off his radio appearances on Sean Hannity's radio show, the second largest syndicated show - with 13 million weekly listeners. Since then Klein has begun a schedule of non stop interviews on major talk radio shows, including Salem Radio Network's Mike Gallagher, Westwood One's Jim Bohannon, and the Laura Ingraham Show.

But the TV cancellations are raising questions about the unusual effort by the Clinton Spin Machine to stop this book.

An MSNBC producer told NewsMax that Chris Matthews' "Hardball" had merely considered booking the Hillary author, saying the idea was dropped when producers found out that the book was "a big piece of crap."

However, another source at the network told NewsMax that MSNBC chief Rick Kaplan has long been close to the Clintons (he was one of the celebrated Friends of Bill and Hillary who spent the night in the Lincoln Bedroom) - a fact that could have played a role in the network snubbing the Klein book.

Media's Double Standard

Critics complain that Klein's book - chock full of sensational allegations about Hillary Clinton's personal life - is too dicey to touch.

Among the criticisms are claims that Klein has accused Hillary of being a lesbian and that Bill Clinton raped his wife.

But a read of Klein's book shows that he never makes either allegation.

"This was Hillary's spin, an exaggeration of items of the book to make it look extreme," former Congressman and NewsMax columnist John LeBoutillier said. "When I read that even conservatives are saying Klein accuses Bill of raping Hillary, I know immediately these people didn't even read the book!"

One reason LeBoutillier suspects the Hillary spin machine is out in full force is that Klein's book is not a conservative attack piece on her.

"This is a book about Hillary's true character written by a journalist with solid mainstream credentials," he said. "This cannot be dismissed as a right wing attack on Hillary."

Klein is a veteran journalist who served as editor of the New York Times Magazine and held top editor jobs with Newsweek and Vanity Fair.

In previous books, Klein's in-depth investigations of his subjects have won him serious praise – and widespread television media coverage.

Klein's recent bestseller, "The Kennedy Curse," exposed the rocky relationship between JFK Jr. and his wife Carolyn Bessette.

The book was sharply criticized by many in the media, especially those close to the Kennedys. Yet almost every major television outlet featured Klein.

Others are noting the media's hypocrisy in dealing with the Klein book and how the same media treated Kitty Kelley's book "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty." Kelley's book offered far more salacious allegations about George W. Bush.

The books are hardly comparable, though; Klein is a veteran, award-winning journalist known for serious, and non political biographies, while Kelley has developed a reputation as a purveyor of gossip on her targets.

Last week, Fox News host Neil Cavuto told his audience, "Kitty [Kelley] was booked on shows. Ed is getting no bookings, period ... Could it be the media relished dirt on the president, less so on the woman who wants to be president?"

With a heated presidential campaign underway last year, Kelley was given star billing on show's like NBC's "Today" show (with an unprecedented interview over three days); CNBC's "Capital Report;" CNN "Newsnight" hosted by Aaron Brown; CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight;" CNN's "American Morning" with Paula Zahn; MSNBC's "Hardball" with Chris Matthews, among others.

Though Kelley made unsubstantiated allegations, including charges of illicit sex and drug use against Bush (previously she accused President Reagan of date rape in a book that received page one coverage from the New York Times), her book drew huge media interest.

But today, Klein, once a favored media author for serious bestsellers including "All Too Human: The Love Story of Jack and Jackie Kennedy" and "Just Jackie: Her Private Years," has been banned from major TV shows.

We know why.

During his interview with syndicated radio host Laura Ingraham this past Wednesday night, Klein revealed just how radioactive he's become.

He related how a leading mover and shaker had called him to disinvite him for a dinner party in Manhattan honoring a liberal politician.

The host told Klein it wasn't personal against him. She simply explained: "Hillary will ruin the politician's career if she finds out you were there."


Klein's story underlines his central complaint that Hillary is dangerous and "Nixonian" with power. But that may be an understatement. Even Richard Nixon as President didn't have the power Hillary Clinton seems to wield today over the mainstream media.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (51057)6/27/2005 7:07:57 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
PETA is an Animal's Worst Friend
by Nathan Tabor

06/22/05

PETA is the worst friend an animal could have these days.

Normally an organization takes its mission statement and tries to fulfill it. Not PETA.

According to the Center for Consumer Freedom, in 2003 alone PETA killed over 85% of the dogs, cats, puppies and kittens it took into its care. During the same time the Norfolk SPCA and Virginia Beach SPCA adopted out 73% and 66% of its animals respectfully.

Is it a money issue? No. PETA takes in millions of dollars each year, over 29 million in 2004. Their mission statement should state ³ Animal Killers spending millions on teaching children to be vegetarians, telling milk drinkers they are Nazis (Durbin wants to be their spokesman), promoting a meatless Thanksgiving, defending violent extremists and killing helpless animals.²

Just this last week two PETA employees picked up 31 healthy dogs and cats and killed them in the back of a van.. They took their bodies and dumped them in a strip mall dumpster. They now face 31 felony charges.

What would PETA have done if hunters had picked up 31 healthy dogs and cats and killed them for fun? PETA would boycott their work places, picket outside their church and plaster this story all over the media.. How many other animals have been slaughtered and dumped by PETA?

The Center for Consumer Freedom created PetaKillsAnimals.com and recently bought a billboard in Times Square to educate people on the evils of PETA. It is truly a shame that animal loving people have been conned by the unethical directors of PETA.

Today PETA stands for People for the Execution of Tame Animals.

Copyright © 2005 by Nathan Tabor






The 31 animals in the back of the van are the tip of the iceburg. These two mopes were caught because they had been doing the same thing, in dumpsters all over the Tidewater, each Tuesday, for months. Perhaps years.

If we speculate that they had been hitting three dumpsters a day, five days a week (hey, whose to say idiot Libs can't work hard for the money), you have 31 times 3 times 5 for 455 animals a week.

Now consider how long you can get away with that sort of thing while the matter wends it way through the various layers of "that's not my problem" that you will encounter from the business owner, the carting company, the dump and the police. At 2000 animals a month for each van, were talking about a whole lot of death going on.

And PeTA has lots of vans...

And why would PeTA do such a thing? In the words attributed to Mark Felt, but never actually spoken, "Follow the Money".

PeTA rakes in Tens of Millions from Little Ol' Ladies and gullible celebrities every year. They do so, in part, because they are seen by the public as providing a shelter of last resort to unwanted animals. But actually providing that shelter is an expensive business. They are in the business of making money, not spending it.

Take a look at the PeTA HQ in Norfolk, Virginia...

You see the vans and the loading docks for handling the animals. You see the the upper floors of offices, no doubt staffed 16 hours a day by a dedicated staff of PeTA telemarketers working on commission. But what don't you see?

You don't see cages. You don't see kennels. You don't see a store-front adoption center. You do see an unusually large mechanical building on the roof, which I would bet, dollars to donuts, conceals the stack for an incinerator.

This is not an animal care facility. It is a factory of death.