Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8560)	6/28/2005 9:38:56 AM
From: kknightmcc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

And for another fact, the judge stated in her ruling "While this court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law claims based on diversity jurisdiction, defendant asserts that she does not have sufficient contacts with the State of New York for this court to exercise jurisdiction over her."

To: kknightmcc who wrote (8560)	6/28/2005 11:46:54 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 12465

Kathy, after reviewing the actual court document (previous post; not provided to me by Mary BTW), I can see that the motion that included the failure to state a claim charge was granted, but that the judge never addressed that issue in particular. However, I also see that the judge tossed out many of the charges last year and discussed substantive issues (such as legally cutting and pasting from your site as opposed to "illegally" linking to it) in the notice of dismissal. - Jeff